board-meeting

name	board-meeting
description	Full board deliberation with discussion rounds - directors debate and reach consensus
arguments	[{"name":"proposal","type":"string","description":"The proposal, plan, or decision to deliberate on","required":false}]
user_invocable	true

/board-meeting — Full Board Deliberation

Run a complete 4-phase board meeting with the 5-member Board of Directors. Directors assess, discuss, debate, and vote to reach consensus.

Usage

/board-meeting [proposal or leave blank to review current track]

The 4 Phases

Phase 1: Individual Assessment (Parallel)

All 5 directors evaluate the proposal independently and simultaneously.

Phase 2: Board Discussion (3 Rounds)

Directors respond to each other's concerns and questions via message bus.

Phase 3: Final Vote

Each director casts their final vote with confidence level.

Phase 4: Board Resolution

Aggregate votes and produce official board decision.

Directors

Director	Domain	Focus
CA	Technical	System design, patterns, scalability
CPO	Product	User value, scope, usability check
CSO	Security	Vulnerabilities, compliance, risk
COO	Operations	Feasibility, timeline, resources
CXO	Experience	UX/UI, accessibility, journey

Resolution Rules

Votes	Resolution
5-0 or 4-1 APPROVE	APPROVED
3-2 APPROVE	APPROVED WITH REVIEW
3-2 REJECT	REJECTED
4-1 or 5-0 REJECT	REJECTED
Tie/Deadlock	ESCALATE to user

Execution Flow

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    PHASE 1: ASSESS                          │
│  ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐              │
│  │  CA  │ │ CPO  │ │ CSO  │ │ COO  │ │ CXO  │  (parallel)  │
│  └──┬───┘ └──┬───┘ └──┬───┘ └──┬───┘ └──┬───┘              │
│     └────────┴────────┴────────┴────────┘                   │
│                       │                                      │
│                       ▼                                      │
│              ┌─────────────────┐                            │
│              │  MESSAGE BUS    │                            │
│              └────────┬────────┘                            │
│                       │                                      │
├───────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
│                    PHASE 2: DISCUSS                         │
│                       │                                      │
│     Round 1: Initial responses to concerns                  │
│     Round 2: Rebuttals and clarifications                   │
│     Round 3: Final positions                                │
│                       │                                      │
├───────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
│                    PHASE 3: VOTE                            │
│                       │                                      │
│  ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐              │
│  │ VOTE │ │ VOTE │ │ VOTE │ │ VOTE │ │ VOTE │              │
│  └──────┘ └──────┘ └──────┘ └──────┘ └──────┘              │
│                       │                                      │
├───────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
│                    PHASE 4: RESOLVE                         │
│                       │                                      │
│              ┌─────────────────┐                            │
│              │    DECISION     │                            │
│              │  + Conditions   │                            │
│              │  + Dissent log  │                            │
│              └─────────────────┘                            │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Output Format

## Board of Directors Resolution

**Proposal**: [Brief description]
**Session**: [timestamp]
**Verdict**: APPROVED | APPROVED WITH REVIEW | REJECTED | ESCALATE

### Vote Summary
| Director | Vote | Confidence | Key Condition |
|----------|------|------------|---------------|
| CA | APPROVE | 0.9 | Add caching layer |
| CPO | APPROVE | 0.8 | Validate with usability check |
| CSO | CONCERNS→APPROVE | 0.7 | Security audit first |
| COO | APPROVE | 0.85 | 2-week buffer |
| CXO | APPROVE | 0.95 | A11y is solid |

**Final: 5-0 APPROVE**

### Conditions for Approval
1. Add caching layer for API responses (CA)
2. Complete security audit before production (CSO)
3. Buffer timeline by 2 weeks (COO)

### Discussion Highlights
- CA challenged CPO on scope → CPO agreed to defer Phase 2
- CSO raised auth concern → CA proposed JWT rotation
- CXO praised accessibility approach

### Dissenting Opinions
None recorded.

---
*Board session complete. Proceed with implementation.*

When to Use

• Major Track Planning — Before starting significant features
• Architecture Decisions — ADRs, system design choices
• Risk Assessment — Security or operational concerns
• Conflict Resolution — When stakeholders disagree
• Go/No-Go Decisions — Launch readiness, major releases