用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity --skill empirical-validation命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | empirical-validation |
| description | Requires proof before marking work complete — no "trust me, it works" |
"The code looks correct" is NOT validation.
Every change must be verified with empirical evidence before being marked complete.
| Change Type | Required Validation | Tool |
|---|---|---|
| UI Changes | Screenshot showing expected visual state | browser_subagent |
| API Endpoints | Command showing correct response | run_command |
| Build/Config | Successful build or test output | run_command |
| Data Changes | Query showing expected data state | run_command |
| File Operations | File listing or content verification | run_command |
Identify Verification Criteria
Execute Verification
Document Evidence
.gsd/JOURNAL.md under the taskConfirm Against Criteria
# Good: Actual test showing response
curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/api/login -d '{"email":"test@test.com"}'
# Output: {"success":true,"token":"..."}
# Bad: Just saying "endpoint works"
# Good: Take screenshot with browser tool
- Navigate to /dashboard
- Capture screenshot
- Confirm: Header visible? Data loaded? Layout correct?
# Bad: "The component should render correctly"
# Good: Show build output
npm run build
# Output: Successfully compiled...
# Bad: "Build should work now"
Never use these as justification for completion:
This skill integrates with:
/verify — Primary workflow using this skill/execute — Must validate before marking tasks completeGEMINI.md — Empirical Validation enforcementIf verification fails:
.gsd/STATE.md