用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/Treasoni/880-exam --skill loop-me命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
为数学题、几何关系、函数图像、积分区域、极坐标曲线和学习笔记生成准确的示意图,并将图像嵌入相关 Obsidian 笔记。用户说画图、配图、示意图、图形直观,或题目中的图形关系能明显帮助理解时使用。
查看/重生成错题本,更新复习状态(未复习/已重做/已掌握)。触发词:错题本、看错题、重练、复习错题。
对话式过程归因——用户贴做题过程,定位出错环节并给出建议,写入 analysis.json 并由错题本渲染。触发词:分析、错因、归因、这题我哪里错了、看我做题过程、我这样做的。
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | loop-me |
| description | Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
| argument-hint | A workflow to design, or nothing to go find one |
Run a stateful /grilling session whose only output is workflow specs. Use the grilling discipline — relentless, one question at a time, a recommended answer attached to each — aimed at the vocabulary and goal below. Create, edit, and delete specs as the grilling resolves things.
A loop is a recurring pattern in the user's life: their career, their week, their morning, a single repeated activity. Picturing a life as loops within loops reveals how predictable its activities really are — which is what makes them worth delegating. Use the lens to find loops worth specifying, and propose ones the user hasn't noticed.
A workflow is the spec of one loop, made real. You run a workflow on a loop — the loop is its running instantiation. Workflows live in workflows/*.md and are the source of truth.
A shared language, reached for only when a workflow calls for it — never a checklist. Mandate nothing structural: a workflow needs no AI, no checkpoint, and no schedule unless the grilling shows it does.
A workflow spec is done when an implementer agent could build it without asking a single question. Grill until then; nothing is done while a question remains.
workflows/*.md — one spec per workflow.NOTES.md — raw notes on the user's world: the tools they use, the channels they process, and their own terminology for both. When it is empty or thin, interview them about their world before specifying anything. Sharpen fuzzy terms into canonical ones as they surface, and record them here.