菜单
Defines the checkpoint protocol for the elegant-researcher-skill pipeline. Use at major research transition points to summarize artifacts, show options, apply mode-specific defaults, and continue without blocking routine decisions.
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/TTAWDTT/elegant-researcher-skill --skill user-interaction命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | user-interaction |
| description | Defines the checkpoint protocol for the elegant-researcher-skill pipeline. Use at major research transition points to summarize artifacts, show options, apply mode-specific defaults, and continue without blocking routine decisions. |
| license | MIT |
This skill controls how the elegant-researcher-skill pipeline involves the user.
| Mode | User Interaction Behavior |
|---|---|
quick-cycle | Minimal checkpoints; use defaults quickly |
deep-cycle | Present checkpoints, but continue with defaults when user gives no direction |
paper-ready | Ask only when full results, venue, or citation status affects claims |
theory-only | Skip experiment handoff; focus on theory and proposed experiments |
human-in-loop | Wait for user decisions at checkpoints |
Each checkpoint response should include:
## [Checkpoint Title]
Status: [one sentence]
Mode: [mode]
Evidence level: [highest relevant level]
Key artifacts:
- [path] - [what it contains]
Summary:
- [key point 1]
- [key point 2]
- [key point 3]
Options:
A. [default option] - [route]
B. [alternative] - [route]
C. [alternative] - [route]
D. [alternative] - [route]
Default: A unless mode-specific rules say otherwise.
Do not include long raw file contents.
Trigger: literature search and literature/gap-analysis.md are complete.
Present:
Options:
A. Continue with the recommended gap. B. Deepen a specific gap. C. Adjust literature direction. D. Switch to theory-only framing.
Default:
human-in-loop: wait for user selection.Trigger: candidate hypotheses and hypothesis-tree.md are complete.
Present:
Options:
A. Start with the recommended hypothesis. B. Select a different hypothesis or multiple hypotheses. C. Add a user hypothesis. D. Brainstorm again.
Default:
human-in-loop: wait for user selection.Trigger: protocols, code, micro-validation, and handoff package are ready.
Present:
Options:
A. Use micro-validation as proof-of-concept and proceed to writing. B. User will run full experiments; wait for results. C. Modify or fix experiments, then re-run micro-validation. D. Switch to theory-only or proposed-experiments path.
Default by mode:
quick-cycle: A.deep-cycle: A.paper-ready: B if user has compute and wants empirical claims; otherwise A with full claims marked pending.theory-only: D.human-in-loop: B.This checkpoint must not silently stall autonomous runs.
Trigger: first draft or research note is complete.
Present:
Options:
A. Polish and finalize. B. Strengthen a section. C. Integrate new user results. D. Rethink contribution.
Default:
human-in-loop: wait for user review.Trigger: final artifact is ready.
Present:
Options:
A. Mark cycle complete. B. Deepen a specific aspect. C. Convert to LaTeX or venue-specific submission. D. Start a new research question.
Default:
human-in-loop: wait for user decision.When full experiments are needed, produce HANDOFF.md with:
At the end of a cycle, the agent must include: