ecc-code-tour

name	ecc-code-tour
description	Create CodeTour `.tour` files — persona-targeted, step-by-step walkthroughs with real file and line anchors. Use for onboarding tours, architecture walkthroughs, PR tours, RCA tours, and structured "explain how this works" requests.
origin	ECC

Code Tour

Create CodeTour .tour files for codebase walkthroughs that open directly to real files and line ranges. Tours live in .tours/ and are meant for the CodeTour format, not ad hoc Markdown notes.

A good tour is a narrative for a specific reader:

• what they are looking at
• why it matters
• what path they should follow next

Only create .tour JSON files. Do not modify source code as part of this skill.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

• the user asks for a code tour, onboarding tour, architecture walkthrough, or PR tour
• the user says "explain how X works" and wants a reusable guided artifact
• the user wants a ramp-up path for a new engineer or reviewer
• the task is better served by a guided sequence than a flat summary

Examples:

• onboarding a new maintainer
• architecture tour for one service or package
• PR-review walk-through anchored to changed files
• RCA tour showing the failure path
• security review tour of trust boundaries and key checks

When NOT to Use

Instead of code-tour	Use
A one-off explanation in chat is enough	answer directly
The user wants prose docs, not a .tour artifact	documentation-lookup or repo docs editing
The task is implementation or refactoring	do the implementation work
The task is broad codebase onboarding without a tour artifact	codebase-onboarding

Workflow

1. Discover

Explore the repo before writing anything:

• README and package/app entry points
• folder structure
• relevant config files
• the changed files if the tour is PR-focused

Do not start writing steps before you understand the shape of the code.

2. Infer the reader

Decide the persona and depth from the request.

Request shape	Persona	Suggested depth
"onboarding", "new joiner"	new-joiner	9-13 steps
"quick tour", "vibe check"	vibecoder	5-8 steps
"architecture"	architect	14-18 steps
"tour this PR"	pr-reviewer	7-11 steps
"why did this break"	rca-investigator	7-11 steps
"security review"	security-reviewer	7-11 steps
"explain how this feature works"	feature-explainer	7-11 steps
"debug this path"	bug-fixer	7-11 steps

3. Read and verify anchors

Every file path and line anchor must be real:

• confirm the file exists
• confirm the line numbers are in range
• if using a selection, verify the exact block
• if the file is volatile, prefer a pattern-based anchor

Never guess line numbers.

4. Write the .tour

Write to:

.tours/<persona>-<focus>.tour

Keep the path deterministic and readable.

5. Validate

Before finishing:

• every referenced path exists
• every line or selection is valid
• the first step is anchored to a real file or directory
• the tour tells a coherent story rather than listing files

Step Types

Content

Use sparingly, usually only for a closing step:

{ "title": "Next Steps", "description": "You can now trace the request path end to end." }

Do not make the first step content-only.

Directory

Use to orient the reader to a module:

{ "directory": "src/services", "title": "Service Layer", "description": "The core orchestration logic lives here." }

File + line

This is the default step type:

{ "file": "src/auth/middleware.ts", "line": 42, "title": "Auth Gate", "description": "Every protected request passes here first." }

Selection

Use when one code block matters more than the whole file:

{
  "file": "src/core/pipeline.ts",
  "selection": {
    "start": { "line": 15, "character": 0 },
    "end": { "line": 34, "character": 0 }
  },
  "title": "Request Pipeline",
  "description": "This block wires validation, auth, and downstream execution."
}

Pattern

Use when exact lines may drift:

{ "file": "src/app.ts", "pattern": "export default class App", "title": "Application Entry" }

URI

Use for PRs, issues, or docs when helpful:

{ "uri": "https://github.com/org/repo/pull/456", "title": "The PR" }

Writing Rule: SMIG

Each description should answer:

• Situation: what the reader is looking at
• Mechanism: how it works
• Implication: why it matters for this persona
• Gotcha: what a smart reader might miss

Keep descriptions compact, specific, and grounded in the actual code.

Narrative Shape

Use this arc unless the task clearly needs something different:

1. orientation
2. module map
3. core execution path
4. edge case or gotcha
5. closing / next move

The tour should feel like a path, not an inventory.

Example

{
  "$schema": "https://aka.ms/codetour-schema",
  "title": "API Service Tour",
  "description": "Walkthrough of the request path for the payments service.",
  "ref": "main",
  "steps": [
    {
      "directory": "src",
      "title": "Source Root",
      "description": "All runtime code for the service starts here."
    },
    {
      "file": "src/server.ts",
      "line": 12,
      "title": "Entry Point",
      "description": "The server boots here and wires middleware before any route is reached."
    },
    {
      "file": 
       
       
       
    
    
       
       
    
  

Anti-Patterns

Anti-pattern	Fix
Flat file listing	Tell a story with dependency between steps
Generic descriptions	Name the concrete code path or pattern
Guessed anchors	Verify every file and line first
Too many steps for a quick tour	Cut aggressively
First step is content-only	Anchor the first step to a real file or directory
Persona mismatch	Write for the actual reader, not a generic engineer

Best Practices

• keep step count proportional to repo size and persona depth
• use directory steps for orientation, file steps for substance
• for PR tours, cover changed files first
• for monorepos, scope to the relevant packages instead of touring everything
• close with what the reader can now do, not a recap

Related Skills

• codebase-onboarding
• coding-standards
• council
• official upstream format: microsoft/codetour