基于 SOC 职业分类
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/vignesh2027/AI-AGENT-SKILLS --skill idea-refine命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | idea-refine |
| description | Sharpen a vague idea into a buildable, scoped proposal |
| difficulty | junior |
| domains | ["general"] |
Most ideas arrive as fuzzy intuitions. This skill converts them into crisp, buildable proposals with clear scope, constraints, and success criteria — before anyone writes a spec or a line of code.
Write one sentence describing the problem being solved. Not the feature — the problem. Example: "Users can't find past orders because search only covers the last 30 days."
Name the specific user persona or system component affected. Vague problems have vague solutions.
Quantify where possible: "affects 20% of active users," "adds 3 minutes to the workflow," "causes 12 support tickets/week." If you can't measure it, question whether it's a real problem.
Write 3 different ways to solve the problem at different points on the effort/impact curve. This prevents anchoring on the first idea.
For each solution: estimate effort (S/M/L), impact (low/medium/high), and risk (low/medium/high). Select the option with the best ratio for the current context.
Explicitly state what this proposal does NOT include. Scope creep starts here if you don't.
One measurable outcome that proves the problem is solved. Not "users like it" — "search result relevance score improves by 15% on the benchmark dataset."
"We know what we want to build — let's just build it" The thing you want to build is a solution. Before committing to a solution, confirm you've correctly understood the problem.
"We don't have data on this yet" Absence of data is a finding. Document your assumptions and validate them in the first iteration.
Build UIs that work for all users including keyboard navigation, screen readers, and WCAG 2.2
Design multi-agent systems with robust tool interfaces, state management, and failure handling
Design systems at the right scale with explicit trade-off documentation