Skip to main content

review-response

Reply to a public review so the next reader is reassured, not the reviewer argued with.

跳到安装

来源信息

仓库
vstorm-co/agenticos
最近来源活动
2026年9月2日 09:15
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
37
分支
7

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
name
Review response
description
Reply to a public review so the next reader is reassured, not the reviewer argued with.
category
marketing
# Replying to a review The audience is the next reader, not the reviewer. That single fact decides the tone. ## Structure, and keep it short Acknowledge the specific thing · say what happened if you know · say what you are doing about it · move the detail off the public thread with a real contact route. Four sentences is usually enough. ## Negative reviews Never dispute the facts in public, even when they are wrong. "That is not what our records show" reads as combative to everybody except the person who wrote it. Acknowledge, resolve privately, and come back to update the thread if it is resolved. ## Positive reviews Reply to the specific detail they praised. A generic thank-you on fifty reviews reads as automation and devalues all of them. ## Always Sign with a name and a role. An unsigned corporate reply persuades nobody. ## Never Offer compensation in public, ask for the review to be removed, or reply to a one-star review within minutes of it landing — it reads as reflex.
在 GitHub 查看