用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/wojons/skills --skill testing-nonfunctional-suite命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Use when you need comprehensive accessibility auditing including WCAG compliance, legal requirements mapping, and user testing with disabilities
Apply systematic adversarial thinking patterns including devil's advocate, assumption busting, red teaming, and white hat security approaches
A 10-step methodology for building software with AI collaboration - from north star through automated Ralph loop execution with zero human-in-the-loop code writing
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | testing-nonfunctional-suite |
| description | Run comprehensive non-functional test suite |
| license | MIT |
| compatibility | opencode |
| metadata | {"audience":"developers","category":"testing"} |
Run comprehensive non-functional testing covering performance, security, accessibility, and other quality attributes.
Use this skill when:
Performance Testing
Security Testing
Accessibility Testing
Compatibility Testing
Usability Testing
# Run non-functional test suite
npm run test:nonfunctional # Custom non-functional suite
# Performance testing
npm run test:performance
npx autocannon -c 100 -d 60 https://app.example.com
# Security scanning
npm run test:security
npm audit
npx snyk test
# Accessibility testing
npm run test:accessibility
npx pa11y https://app.example.com
# Compatibility testing
npm run test:compatibility
npx playwright test --browser=all
Non-Functional Test Suite Results:
──────────────────────────────
Performance (Load: 1000 users, 10 minutes):
✅ Response Time: Avg 320ms (target < 500ms)
✅ Throughput: 2.1k req/sec
⚠️ CPU Usage: 92% (near limit)
✅ Error Rate: 0.05%
Security Assessment:
✅ No critical vulnerabilities found
⚠️ 3 medium severity issues
✅ Dependencies up to date
⚠️ Missing security headers (CSP, HSTS)
Accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA):
✅ 42/58 criteria passed
⚠️ 12 criteria partially met
❌ 4 criteria failed (color contrast, form labels)
Compatibility:
✅ Chrome, Firefox, Safari (latest)
⚠️ Edge: Minor layout issues
✅ Mobile: iOS & Android responsive
Usability:
✅ Navigation intuitive
⚠️ Error messages could be clearer
✅ Forms accessible and clear
Overall: Meets most non-functional requirements
Priority Fixes: Accessibility issues, security headers