Skip to main content

llm-evaluation

Implement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks.

跳到安装

来源信息

仓库
wshobson/agents
最近来源活动
2026年7月7日 16:17
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
39,856
分支
4,249

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

文件资源管理器
2 个文件

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
name
llm-evaluation
description
Implement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks.
# LLM Evaluation Master comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications, from automated metrics to human evaluation and A/B testing. ## When to Use This Skill - Measuring LLM application performance systematically - Comparing different models or prompts - Detecting performance regressions before deployment - Validating improvements from prompt changes - Building confidence in production systems - Establishing baselines and tracking progress over time - Debugging unexpected model behavior ## Core Evaluation Types ### 1. Automated Metrics Fast, repeatable, scalable evaluation using computed scores. **Text Generation:** - **BLEU**: N-gram overlap (translation) - **ROUGE**: Recall-oriented (summarization) - **METEOR**: Semantic similarity - **BERTScore**: Embedding-based similarity - **Perplexity**: Language model confidence **Classification:** - **Accuracy**: Percentage correct - **Precision/Recall/F1**: Class-specific performance - **Confusion Matrix**: Error patterns - **AUC-ROC**: Ranking quality **Retrieval (RAG):** - **MRR**: Mean Reciprocal Rank - **NDCG**: Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain - **Precision@K**: Relevant in top K - **Recall@K**: Coverage in top K ### 2. Human Evaluation Manual assessment for quality aspects difficult to automate. **Dimensions:** - **Accuracy**: Factual correctness - **Coherence**: Logical flow - **Relevance**: Answers the question - **Fluency**: Natural language quality - **Safety**: No harmful content - **Helpfulness**: Useful to the user ### 3. LLM-as-Judge Use stronger LLMs to evaluate weaker model outputs. **Approaches:** - **Pointwise**: Score individual responses - **Pairwise**: Compare two responses - **Reference-based**: Compare to gold standard - **Reference-free**: Judge without ground truth ## Quick Start ```python from dataclasses import dataclass from typing import Callable import numpy as np @dataclass class Metric: name: str fn: Callable @staticmethod def accuracy(): return Metric("accuracy", calculate_accuracy) @staticmethod def bleu(): return Metric("bleu", calculate_bleu) @staticmethod def bertscore(): return Metric("bertscore", calculate_bertscore) @staticmethod def custom(name: str, fn: Callable): return Metric(name, fn) class EvaluationSuite: def __init__(self, metrics: list[Metric]): self.metrics = metrics async def evaluate(self, model, test_cases: list[dict]) -> dict: results = {m.name: [] for m in self.metrics} for test in test_cases: prediction = await model.predict(test["input"]) for metric in self.metrics: score = metric.fn( prediction=prediction, reference=test.get("expected"), context=test.get("context") ) results[metric.name].append(score) return { "metrics": {k: np.mean(v) for k, v in results.items()}, "raw_scores": results } # Usage suite = EvaluationSuite([ Metric.accuracy(), Metric.bleu(), Metric.bertscore(), Metric.custom("groundedness", check_groundedness) ]) test_cases = [ { "input": "What is the capital of France?", "expected": "Paris", "context": "France is a country in Europe. Paris is its capital." }, ] results = await suite.evaluate(model=your_model, test_cases=test_cases) ``` ## Detailed patterns and worked examples Detailed pattern documentation lives in `references/details.md`. Read that file when the navigation tier above is insufficient.
在 GitHub 查看