Skip to main content

eou-refactor

Generate candidate EOU refactor options from an audit or incident. Does not apply changes directly.

来源信息

仓库
xiaolai/eou-foundry
最近来源活动
2026年9月30日 06:02
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
10
分支
2

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
name
eou-refactor
description
Generate candidate EOU refactor options from an audit or incident. Does not apply changes directly.
# Refactor EOU Generate candidate refactor options for `$target`. Do not apply any change. ## Inputs - `$target` (required) — either an EOU ID (resolved to `foundry/eous/{id}.yml` or `foundry/meta-eous/{id}.yml`) or a path to an audit report or diagnosis file. When an audit path is given, the EOU ID is extracted from the report. ## Required reading 1. `engine/refactoring-patterns.yml` (plus the app's `foundry/overrides/refactoring-patterns.yml`, if present) — canonical refactor types (split, merge, scope-reduction, authority-downgrade, step-extraction, validator-addition, stop-condition-injection, responsibility-separation) 2. `foundry/constitution.yml` — invariants that constrain any proposed change 3. `engine/governance.yml` (plus the app's `foundry/overrides/governance.yml`, if present) — authority boundaries and lifecycle-gate rules; required because refactor options can touch authority_level and blast_radius 4. The source EOU spec (infer path from `$target` if an audit path is given) ## Stop conditions Halt and report before generating options if: - `$target` does not identify an EOU ID and one cannot be inferred. - No audit report or incident exists to identify a structural problem — do not generate options from speculation. - The EOU spec does not exist in `foundry/eous/` or `foundry/meta-eous/`. ## Procedure 1. Read `$target` (EOU ID or audit report). If it is an audit report, extract the EOU ID and load the corresponding spec. 2. Identify the structural problems: scope creep, authority inflation, weak validation, missing stop conditions, unbounded steps, ambiguous responsibility, missing trace preservation, blast-radius overreach, and circular EOU dependencies. 3. For each structural problem, generate one or more refactor options using the patterns in `engine/refactoring-patterns.yml`. 4. Include a "no change" baseline option with its trade-offs stated. 5. Rank options by: smallest blast radius, then lowest authority required, then easiest rollback. 6. For each option that touches authority, approval, or constitutional invariants: mark `requires_ecp: true`. 7. Write the candidate refactor set. ## Output Write to `foundry/self-evolution/refactor-options/{eou_id}-refactor-{YYYYMMDD}.yml`. Each option must include: ```yaml option_id: target_failure: # the structural problem this addresses proposed_change: # one specific modification (not a vague direction) expected_benefit: # observable improvement risk: # what can degrade affected_files: # list of files that would change tests_required: # regression cases to add or update rollback_plan: # how to revert arguments_against: # strongest case for not doing this requires_ecp: # true | false ``` ## ECP trigger criteria Mark `requires_ecp: true` when the option does any of the following: - changes `authority_level` - modifies `blast_radius.forbidden_scope` - weakens or removes a validator or stop condition - changes responsibility or approval authority - modifies any constitutional invariant ## Constraints - Do not apply any refactor option. Write candidate set only. - Always include the "no change" baseline as an option. - The recommended minimal set must exclude options with unresolved open risks.
在 GitHub 查看