xl1-build

name	xl1-build
description	Interactive planning wizard for new XL1 dApps. Refines a vague or exploratory build request into a concrete spec (archetype, patterns, network, multi-party roles, headless verification) before any scaffolding runs. Activates when the user wants to build, design, or plan something on XL1 but hasn't fully specified what — phrases like "I want to build something on XL1", "help me design a dApp", "what could I build", or any "build me X on XL1" prompt where X is under-specified. Do NOT activate when the user has already given a concrete, complete spec (e.g., names the archetype, the patterns, the network) — defer directly to [xl1-scaffold](../xl1-scaffold/SKILL.md) in that case.
metadata	{"version":"1.1.31"}

XL1 Build Wizard

This skill is the planning front-end to the scaffold. It runs a short, structured conversation with the user to turn an exploratory build request into a refined prompt that xl1-scaffold can act on directly.

Run this skill before the scaffold, not in parallel with it. The deliverable of this skill is a refined prompt, not a scaffolded project.

Skill identity. This skill's version is exposed in this file's frontmatter under metadata.version. When reporting which skills informed your work, format as <skill-name> v<version> (e.g. xl1-build v1.1.19). When multiple skills from this plugin are active, each may be listed.

When this skill activates

Activate when the user's request is exploratory, vague, or under-specified:

• "I want to build something on XL1" / "help me design a dApp"
• "What could I build with this?" / "show me what's possible"
• "Build me a game on XL1" (game shape unspecified)
• "I want a token on XL1" (no decisions on mint cap, transfer rules, etc.)
• User explicitly invokes /xl1-build

Do not activate when:

• The user has named the archetype, the fairness/timing constraints, and the patterns — that's already a concrete spec; hand directly to xl1-scaffold
• The user is asking a question about XL1 (concepts, APIs) — that's xl1-knowledge or xyo-knowledge
• The user is working in an existing project — that's xl1-patterns (or a knowledge layer)

If the trigger is ambiguous (concrete enough to scaffold, vague enough to refine), ask one question: "Do you want me to plan the dApp shape with you first, or do you have a concrete spec in mind already?"

How to run the wizard

Four phases. Use AskUserQuestion for the question rounds. Keep the conversation tight — the user invoked this for guidance, not an interrogation.

Phase 1 — Identify the archetype

Ask one AskUserQuestion round with the archetype options below. Pick the 3–4 that fit the prompt best; do not show all of them. If the user's wording already names an archetype (e.g., "rock-paper-scissors" → hidden-move game), pick it and skip to Phase 2.

Archetype	Trigger phrases	Primary patterns
Hidden-move multi-party game	"rock paper scissors", "sealed bid", "simultaneous reveal", any game where seeing the opponent first would be unfair	commit-reveal, chain-data-indexing-service, in-page-datalakes
Prediction market / betting	"prediction market", "betting on an outcome", "settle when X happens"	commit-reveal-prediction-markets
Atomic exchange / escrow / swap	"swap", "trade", "escrow", "neither party gets anything unless both commit"	atomic-exchange
Fungible token (XRC-20-style)	"token", "ticker", "mint cap", "transferable balances"	fungible-tokens, inscription-substrate
Inscription / NFT-like / collectible	"ordinals", "NFT", "transferable owned objects", "on-chain artifact"	inscription-substrate
Indexer / dashboard / history browser	"leaderboard", "browse past X", "search across blocks", read-only viewer	chain-data-indexing-service, in-page-datalakes
Wallet utility / one-shot interaction	"send X to Y", "balance dashboard", "one-click contract call"	None beyond browser-ux

Phase 2 — Refine details for the chosen archetype

Each archetype has a fixed follow-up question set. Combine into a single AskUserQuestion call (max 4 questions). Skip any answer the prompt already gave you.

Hidden-move multi-party game

1. How many players per round? (2 / 3 / N)
2. Are there stakes? (No / Equal stake on both sides / Asymmetric)
3. Should anyone be able to browse past games without a wallet? (Yes — read-only history / No — players only)
4. Reveal deadline behavior? (No-reveal forfeits / No-reveal blocks settlement)

Prediction market / betting

1. Who can resolve outcomes? (Configured authority list / DAO-style vote / Oracle)
2. Stake currency? (XL1 native / XRC-20 / no stakes)
3. Browse markets without wallet? (Yes / No)

Atomic exchange / escrow / swap

1. How many parties? (2 / 3+)
2. What's being exchanged? (Two fungible tokens / Token ↔ inscription / Custom payloads)
3. Who authorizes appraisals/receipts? (Configured list / Counterparties only)

Fungible token (XRC-20-style)

1. Open ticker registration or single canonical ticker?
2. Mint policy? (Capped per-mint / Uncapped / Allowlist)
3. Should there be a dashboard to browse holders/supply?

Inscription / NFT-like / collectible

1. What gets inscribed? (Image bytes / JSON metadata / Free-form bytes)
2. Transferable?
3. Should there be a gallery / browser UI?

Indexer / dashboard / history browser

1. What's being indexed? (Existing schemas like XL1 transfers, or a specific dApp's payloads)
2. Wallet-gated, or fully public?
3. Real-time (block-driven) or polled?

Wallet utility / one-shot interaction

1. What chain action does the user trigger? (Send / Sign / Inscribe / Custom)
2. Anything to display from chain state before/after?

Custom / not listed Ask the user to describe the flow in 2–3 sentences. Then map it manually to primitives in xl1-patterns.

Phase 3 — Capture the environment

One final AskUserQuestion round, two questions:

1. Network target? (Mainnet / Sequence / Local devnet)
2. Headless verification? (Yes — I want a .env seed phrase and a Node verification script / No — browser-only)

Headless verification is the cue that makes xl1-scaffold wire up GatewayBuilder.buildRunner() and run the script before reporting done — explained in headless-verification. When the user says yes, also ask which accounts hold funds (e.g., "accounts 0 and 1") so multi-party roles can be assigned.

Phase 4 — Synthesize the refined prompt and hand off

Produce a single prompt block in this shape and show it to the user before scaffolding:

Build an XL1 dApp.

Shape: <one-line archetype description, e.g. "two-player rock-paper-scissors with sealed moves">
Network: <mainnet | sequence | local>
Patterns: <comma-separated list of pattern doc names>
Multi-party: <N parties; accounts 0 and 1 hold funds | n/a>
History/browse: <public read-only via in-page datalake | wallet-gated | none>
Backend: <monorepo with xl1-service indexer | react only>
Headless verification: <yes — .env seed phrase + Node script | no>
Skills: <comma-separated xyo-skills plugin skill names that informed this plan or will guide scaffolding (e.g. "xl1-build, xl1-patterns, xl1-scaffold")>
Version: <this plugin's version, formatted "xl1-build v<version>" — read from xl1-build's frontmatter metadata.version; all xyo-skills travel together so one stamp covers every entry in `Skills` above (e.g. "xl1-build v1.1.19")>
Notes: <any free-form constraint from the user that doesn't fit a slot>

After the user confirms (or edits) the spec, generate the project-specific acceptance criteria following the guidance in xy-development/workflow.md § Writing Project-Specific Acceptance Criteria — 5–10 observable bullets, split into positive and negative assertions, drawn from the user's answers + the loaded domain skills (patterns, knowledge layers). No new user questions — you have all the context you need from Phases 1–3 and the skill stack already in scope.

Then write the PRD to PRD.md at the cwd. The PRD is the durable, agent-readable record of the plan — it survives the chat, primes future sessions, lets xl1-scaffold recover the spec if chat context is lost, and carries Layer 3 of the completion gate so the agent has a deterministic exit condition.

If PRD.md already exists at the cwd, ask the user with a single AskUserQuestion:

A PRD.md already exists. Overwrite it with this new plan, or save the new plan to PRD-<YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM>.md and leave the existing one in place?

Use the user's answer. Do not silently overwrite.

The PRD file shape:

# <one-line goal derived from Shape — e.g. "Two-player rock-paper-scissors with sealed moves">

*Generated by xl1-build v<version> on <YYYY-MM-DD>.*

## Build target

- **Shape:** <archetype>
- **Network:** <mainnet | sequence | local>
- **Patterns:** <comma-separated pattern doc names>
- **Multi-party:** <N parties; accounts 0 and 1 hold funds | n/a>
- **History/browse:** <public read-only via in-page datalake |  | >
  
  



This project is complete when ALL of the following pass. If any item fails, fix it and re-walk; do not stop on partial pass. See []() for the layering rules.


See [](). Always applies.


See [](). Applies when the project is a browser-facing dApp on XL1 (omit this layer for service-only / CLI-only projects).



Positive:
 [ ] 
 [ ] 
 [ ] <... 2–5 more positive criteria>

Negative:
 [ ] 
 [ ] 
 [ ] <... 1–3 more negative criteria>







xl1-build v

The Build target / Skills referenced / Plugin version / Notes sections are reshapings of the synthesized prompt — no new questions. The Acceptance criteria section is generated by the agent at PRD-write time, following the criteria-writing guidance referenced above. Each criterion must be observable (UI flow, command exit code, file inspection, network response) so the loop can deterministically check it.

After the PRD is written, hand off explicitly:

Plan saved to PRD.md. I'll now invoke xl1-scaffold to bootstrap the project from this spec.

Then follow xl1-scaffold as if the user had originally pasted the synthesized prompt. The scaffold's "Interpreting the prompt" section will read the network, accounts, and headless cues directly out of the synthesized prompt — that's why the prompt shape mirrors what the scaffold expects. If the scaffold runs without the synthesized prompt in context (e.g. a fresh conversation), it will read PRD.md instead.

What the wizard does not do

• It does not scaffold. That's the scaffold's job; this skill stops at the synthesized prompt + hand-off line.
• It does not implement features. After scaffold, the work follows xl1-patterns.
• It does not answer concept questions ("how does a bound witness work?"). Those go to xyo-knowledge / xl1-knowledge without running the wizard at all.
• It does not re-run on an existing project. If the user wants to add something to a scaffolded dApp, the entry point is xl1-patterns.

Anti-patterns

• Don't run the wizard when the user already gave a complete spec. Round-tripping a concrete prompt through clarifying questions wastes the user's time and signals that the agent didn't read carefully. The trigger conditions exist to prevent this.
• Don't ask more than the table prescribes. Each archetype's question set is sized for the smallest spec that unblocks scaffolding. Resist adding "while we're here" questions — anything not on the list can be decided during implementation.
• Don't free-form the synthesized prompt. The hand-off block has a fixed shape so the scaffold can read it the same way every time. Drift in shape produces drift in scaffold behavior.
• Don't skip the user-confirmation step. Show the synthesized prompt and let the user correct it before scaffolding. The whole point of the wizard is to make the spec inspectable.