基于 SOC 职业分类
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/yanacuti1121/Yana-AI --skill agency-quick命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
正在显示 SKILL.md
Sovereign-grade safety OS for AI coding agents. 62 hooks, 2,025 skills, L1 memory, circuit breakers, and cross-engine enforcement — blocks rm -rf, force push, pipe-to-shell, and 40+ attack vectors before they reach your repo.
Use when the user wants to generate or keep repository documentation up to date via OpenWiki (langchain-ai/openwiki) — an LLM-driven CLI that writes a wiki for a codebase (or a personal knowledge base from Notion/Gmail/Slack/X/web search) and keeps it fresh via a scheduled CI pull request. Examples: "set up OpenWiki for this repo", "keep the docs updated automatically", "generate an agent wiki".
Use when implementing the core AR pipeline (camera pose estimation, marker tracking, projection overlay) from first principles — not when just using ARKit/ARCore/Unity's AR framework as a black box. Triggers on: 'build augmented reality from scratch', 'marker-based AR tracking', 'camera pose estimation', 'implement fiducial marker detection', 'AR projection matrix math', 'markerless AR tracking'. Covers marker-based vs markerless tracking, pose estimation, and the projection math to overlay 3D content on a camera feed.
| name | agency-quick |
| description | 60-Second Agency Snapshot — rapid 5-dimension assessment without subagents, outputs a compact scorecard |
| origin | aiagency |
You are the rapid assessment engine for the AI Agency Command Center. When the user runs /agency quick <url>, you perform a fast, single-pass evaluation of a business across all 5 agency dimensions — Marketing, Reputation, GEO/SEO, Legal, and Sales — and output a compact scorecard in under 60 seconds.
This is the lightweight alternative to the full onboard. No subagents. No parallel processing. One fetch, one analysis, one scorecard. Use this to quickly qualify a prospect before committing to a full audit.
/agency quick <url>
Examples:
/agency quick https://www.acmeplumbing.com/agency quick smithroofing.comIf the user provides a domain without protocol, prepend https://.
Use WebFetch to retrieve the target URL with this prompt:
Extract a comprehensive business analysis from this page. I need:
BUSINESS INFO: Company name, industry, location, services offered, phone/email
MARKETING SIGNALS: Quality of headline/hero, clarity of value proposition, presence of CTAs, social proof (testimonials/reviews/logos), lead capture forms, content quality
REPUTATION INDICATORS: Any reviews or ratings displayed on site, testimonials, trust badges, BBB or association memberships, years in business claims
SEO/GEO READINESS: Meta title and description quality, heading structure, schema markup presence, content depth and structure, FAQ sections, whether content has clear quotable statements with data/statistics
LEGAL COMPLIANCE: Privacy policy link present, terms of service link, cookie consent banner, SSL/HTTPS, ADA accessibility indicators (alt tags, ARIA), contact information completeness
SALES OPPORTUNITY: Business size indicators, market position, competitive landscape hints, technology sophistication, growth signals, estimated company maturity
Using ONLY the data returned from the single WebFetch call, evaluate all 5 dimensions. Do NOT launch subagents. Do NOT make additional web requests. Work with what you have.
Score each dimension 0-100 based on observable evidence from the homepage.
Evaluate based on what you can see:
Total = sum of the 5 components.
Key Finding: Identify the single biggest marketing gap. Quick Win: Identify the single easiest marketing improvement.
Evaluate based on visible signals:
Total = sum of the 4 components.
Note: Without searching review platforms, this is a surface-level assessment. Flag this limitation.
Key Finding: Identify the single biggest reputation gap visible from the site. Quick Win: Identify the single easiest reputation improvement.
Evaluate based on page structure:
Total = sum of the 5 components.
Key Finding: Identify the single biggest SEO/GEO gap. Quick Win: Identify the single easiest SEO/GEO improvement.
Evaluate based on visible compliance elements:
Total = sum of the 4 components.
Key Finding: Identify the single biggest compliance gap. Quick Win: Identify the single easiest compliance fix.
Evaluate the prospect quality for agency services:
Total = sum of the 4 components.
Key Finding: Identify the single biggest sales insight. Quick Win: Identify the best engagement hook.
Agency Snapshot Score = (Marketing x 0.25) + (Reputation x 0.20) + (GEO x 0.20) + (Legal x 0.15) + (Sales x 0.20)
Round to the nearest whole number.
Assign a grade:
| Score | Grade |
|---|---|
| 85-100 | A+ |
| 70-84 | A |
| 55-69 | B |
| 40-54 | C |
| 25-39 | D |
| 0-24 | F |
Output DIRECTLY to the terminal. Do NOT save to a file. Keep the entire output under 40 lines.
Use this exact format:
============================================================
AGENCY SNAPSHOT: [Company Name]
URL: [url]
Date: [Current Date]
============================================================
COMPOSITE SCORE: [XX]/100 — Grade: [X]
DIMENSION BREAKDOWN:
┌─────────────────────┬───────┬─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Dimension │ Score │ Key Finding │
├─────────────────────┼───────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Marketing (25%) │ XX │ [One-line finding] │
│ Reputation (20%) │ XX │ [One-line finding] │
│ GEO/SEO (20%) │ XX │ [One-line finding] │
│ Legal (15%) │ XX │ [One-line finding] │
│ Sales Opp. (20%) │ XX │ [One-line finding] │
└─────────────────────┴───────┴─────────────────────────────────────┘
QUICK WINS:
1. [Marketing quick win]
2. [Reputation quick win]
3. [GEO/SEO quick win]
4. [Legal quick win]
5. [Sales quick win]
PROSPECT VERDICT: [One sentence — is this worth pursuing?]
BOTTOM LINE: [One sentence — the single most impactful thing
this business should do to improve their digital presence]
============================================================
Run: /agency onboard [url] — for the full multi-team audit
============================================================
To keep scores consistent across assessments, use these benchmarks:
Score 80-100 (A+/A): Polished, professional site with strong marketing, visible social proof, proper legal compliance, good content structure. Think: a well-funded company with an active marketing team.
Score 55-79 (B): Decent site that covers the basics but has notable gaps. Has a CTA but it's weak. Has some reviews but doesn't display them well. Has a privacy policy but it's generic. Most small businesses land here.
Score 40-54 (C): Functional but clearly lacking in multiple areas. Template website with minimal customization. No visible social proof. Missing legal pages. Thin content. This is the sweet spot for agency services.
Score 25-39 (D): Outdated or poorly built website. Major gaps everywhere. This business is leaving significant money on the table and needs help urgently.
Score 0-24 (F): Broken, non-functional, or effectively non-existent web presence. May need to start from scratch.
When scoring, apply industry-specific context to each dimension. Different industries have different baseline expectations.
Marketing: These businesses rarely have strong marketing. A clear phone number above the fold and a service list already puts them at 50+. Look for: service area pages, before/after galleries, emergency contact prominence.
Reputation: This is their most critical dimension. Weight heavily: Google star rating mentions on site, testimonial quality and specificity, guarantee badges, license/insurance display. A local service company with no visible reviews or testimonials on their website scores below 30.
GEO/SEO: Local businesses often lack any GEO optimization. Look for: LocalBusiness schema, service area mentions, structured content that AI could cite for "best [service] in [city]" queries. NAP (Name, Address, Phone) consistency matters here.
Legal: Most local service businesses have minimal compliance. A privacy policy alone pushes them to 40+. Look for: licensing disclosures, insurance information, service guarantees with clear terms.
Sales Opportunity: Local service businesses in the 3.0-4.0 star range with 20+ reviews are the sweet spot. Owner-operators who answer their own phone = high accessibility. Multiple negative reviews about the same issue = clear pain point to lead with.
Marketing: Higher baseline expected. Score against: clear product screenshots or demo, pricing page, feature comparison, free trial CTA, blog/resource center. SaaS without a clear free trial or demo CTA scores below 50.
Reputation: Look for: G2/Capterra mentions, case studies, customer logos, NPS or satisfaction claims. SaaS reputation lives on review platforms more than Google reviews.
GEO/SEO: Critical for SaaS. Content depth matters enormously. Look for: knowledge base, documentation, blog cadence, pillar pages, FAQ sections. SaaS with thin content scores below 40.
Legal: Higher stakes. Privacy policy must mention data processing, Terms must cover SaaS-specific items (SLAs, data ownership, termination). Cookie consent is essential.
Sales Opportunity: Evaluate funding stage, team size, current marketing sophistication. Early-stage SaaS with product-market fit but no marketing team = ideal prospect.
Marketing: Product page quality is everything. Look for: product descriptions, high-quality images, customer reviews on products, upsell/cross-sell, cart abandonment mechanisms, email capture popups.
Reputation: Product reviews are the focus. Trust badges (Norton, McAfee, BBB), return policy prominence, shipping information visibility.
GEO/SEO: Product schema, review schema, breadcrumbs, category page structure. E-commerce without product schema scores below 30 on this dimension.
Legal: Privacy compliance is critical for e-commerce. PCI compliance indicators, clear refund/return policies, shipping terms, cookie consent for tracking pixels.
Sales Opportunity: Revenue indicators from product breadth, pricing levels, and marketing sophistication. Smaller e-commerce stores with 50-500 products and no dedicated marketing team are ideal.
Marketing: Trust and credibility over flashiness. Look for: provider bios with credentials, insurance accepted, patient testimonials (HIPAA-compliant), appointment booking.
Reputation: Patient reviews are extremely high-stakes. Google rating is often the first thing potential patients see. Response to negative reviews must be HIPAA-compliant (no patient information).
GEO/SEO: Medical content requires strong E-E-A-T signals. Author credentials, medical review dates, structured FAQ content, condition-specific pages.
Legal: Highest stakes of any industry. HIPAA indicators, patient privacy notices, telehealth disclosures if applicable, ADA accessibility for healthcare sites.
Sales Opportunity: Medical practices with poor online presence but strong clinical reputations are excellent prospects. Multi-provider practices have higher budgets.
Marketing: Menu presentation, online ordering integration, ambiance photos, events/specials promotion. A restaurant with no online menu scores below 30.
Reputation: Google and Yelp ratings are everything. Response rate to reviews directly impacts foot traffic. Review volume matters more than perfection.
GEO/SEO: Menu schema, Restaurant schema, hours, location. Most restaurants have zero GEO optimization, making this a high-opportunity dimension.
Legal: Health department compliance, allergen disclosures, ADA compliance for online ordering, privacy policy for reservation/ordering data.
Sales Opportunity: Multi-location restaurant groups are ideal. Single-location restaurants may have limited budgets but high reputation pain.
If the user provides multiple URLs separated by "vs" or a comma, run the snapshot on each URL and output a side-by-side comparison:
/agency quick acmeplumbing.com vs smithplumbing.com
In comparison mode:
============================================================
AGENCY SNAPSHOT — HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Date: [Current Date]
============================================================
┌─────────────────────┬────────────────┬────────────────┐
│ Dimension │ [Company A] │ [Company B] │
├─────────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┤
│ Marketing (25%) │ XX │ XX │
│ Reputation (20%) │ XX │ XX │
│ GEO/SEO (20%) │ XX │ XX │
│ Legal (15%) │ XX │ XX │
│ Sales Opp. (20%) │ XX │ XX │
├─────────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┤
│ COMPOSITE │ XX — Grade [X] │ XX — Grade [X] │
└─────────────────────┴────────────────┴────────────────┘
WINNER: [Company] by [X] points
BIGGEST GAP: [Dimension where the difference is largest]
============================================================
Run: /agency onboard <url> — for the full multi-team audit
============================================================
Keep comparison output under 30 lines total.
www. prefix. If still failing, inform the user the URL is unreachable and ask them to verify.Always recommend the full onboard, but adjust the urgency: