| name | anti-benchmark |
| description | Challenge industry best practices' hidden assumptions. Deconstruct benchmarks to reveal unexamined constraints. |
| execution | strategy |
| used-by | assumption-destruction |
Anti-Benchmark
Challenge industry best practices' hidden assumptions.
State Ledger
| Resource | Target | Current | % |
|---|
| web-search | 25 | 0 | 0% |
| web-research | 10 | 0 | 0% |
| paper-overview | 25 | 0 | 0% |
| paper-search | 15 | 0 | 0% |
| paper-research | 5 | 0 | 0% |
HARD-GATE
Cannot exit strategy until ≥80% of each budget line is consumed OR yield targets are met with justification for remaining budget.
Available Tactics
| Tactic | Role |
|---|
| assumption-enumeration | Surface assumptions hidden in benchmarks |
Available SOPs
| SOP | Role |
|---|
| benchmark-challenge | Identify and negate benchmark assumptions |
| sacred-cow-identification | Find unquestioned beliefs behind best practices |
| assumption-perturbation | Test what happens when benchmark assumptions fail |
| constructive-rebellion | Build alternatives that violate benchmarks constructively |
| destruction-synthesis | Synthesize anti-benchmark outputs |
Execution Guidance
- Identify benchmarks: Catalog the industry best practices and standards in the domain
- Deconstruct: Use benchmark-challenge to expose hidden assumptions in each
- Surface sacred cows: Use sacred-cow-identification for deeper unquestioned beliefs
- Perturb: Use assumption-perturbation to test "what if this standard is wrong?"
- Research alternatives: Search for domains that succeed WITHOUT these benchmarks
- Build: Use constructive-rebellion to form solutions that violate conventions productively
- Synthesize: Produce structured output via destruction-synthesis