用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill dependency-mapping命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
正在显示 SKILL.md
Strategy: Dialectic engine retuned for truth-seeking, not survival. A defender steelmans a claim into its MOST falsifiable form, a critic attacks to refute it, a judge classifies the exchange into BROKEN/CORROBORATED/UNFALSIFIABLE — the judge does NOT pick a winner or score persuasiveness. Methods: Irving debate (repurposed), Toulmin argumentation, Mayo severe testing.
Campaign: Logical extreme and boundary testing via reductio ad absurdum and edge-case analysis. Core question: Does this artifact collapse under logical limits and boundary conditions? Methods: Lakatos 1976, Dutilh Novaes 2016, BVA, Flyvbjerg Critical Case, Popper.
Campaign for mapping argument structures — extract claims, link evidence, assess strength, synthesize positions. Produces argument graphs in the wiki vault.
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | dependency-mapping |
| description | SOP: map dependency relationships among sub-questions |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| category | hypothesis-formation |
| type | sop |
| campaign | research-question |
| input | List of sub-questions |
| output | Dependency graph + critical path + suggested answering order |
| dependencies | {"skills":["subagent-spawning"]} |
Map dependency relationships among sub-questions — determine which sub-questions must be answered first.
Dependencies:
SQ1 → SQ2 (strong: SQ2 needs SQ1's result as input)
SQ1 → SQ3 (weak: SQ3 benefits from SQ1 but can proceed independently)
SQ2 → SQ4 (strong)
Circular dependencies: NONE / [list]
Critical path: SQ1 → SQ2 → SQ4 (length: 3)
Parallel groups: [SQ1, SQ3] can run simultaneously