用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill finer-criteria-check命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Strategy: Dialectic engine retuned for truth-seeking, not survival. A defender steelmans a claim into its MOST falsifiable form, a critic attacks to refute it, a judge classifies the exchange into BROKEN/CORROBORATED/UNFALSIFIABLE — the judge does NOT pick a winner or score persuasiveness. Methods: Irving debate (repurposed), Toulmin argumentation, Mayo severe testing.
Campaign: Logical extreme and boundary testing via reductio ad absurdum and edge-case analysis. Core question: Does this artifact collapse under logical limits and boundary conditions? Methods: Lakatos 1976, Dutilh Novaes 2016, BVA, Flyvbjerg Critical Case, Popper.
Campaign for mapping argument structures — extract claims, link evidence, assess strength, synthesize positions. Produces argument graphs in the wiki vault.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | finer-criteria-check |
| description | SOP: check research-question quality against each of the 5 FINER criteria |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| category | hypothesis-formation |
| type | sop |
| campaign | research-question |
| input | Research question (RQ) |
| output | 5 per-criterion verdicts + revision suggestions for failed items |
| dependencies | {"skills":["subagent-spawning"]} |
FINER 5-criteria per-item check — the standardized test of research-question quality.
F: PASS/FAIL — [rationale]
I: PASS/FAIL — [rationale]
N: PASS/FAIL — [rationale]
E: PASS/FAIL — [rationale]
R: PASS/FAIL — [rationale]
Overall: PASS (5/5) / PARTIAL (X/5)
Suggestions: [specific revision suggestions for FAIL items]