用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill mechanism-mapping命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Strategy: Dialectic engine retuned for truth-seeking, not survival. A defender steelmans a claim into its MOST falsifiable form, a critic attacks to refute it, a judge classifies the exchange into BROKEN/CORROBORATED/UNFALSIFIABLE — the judge does NOT pick a winner or score persuasiveness. Methods: Irving debate (repurposed), Toulmin argumentation, Mayo severe testing.
Campaign: Logical extreme and boundary testing via reductio ad absurdum and edge-case analysis. Core question: Does this artifact collapse under logical limits and boundary conditions? Methods: Lakatos 1976, Dutilh Novaes 2016, BVA, Flyvbjerg Critical Case, Popper.
Campaign for mapping argument structures — extract claims, link evidence, assess strength, synthesize positions. Produces argument graphs in the wiki vault.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | mechanism-mapping |
| description | Map causal mechanisms between variables |
| execution | strategy |
| dependencies | {"tactics":["counterfactual-reasoning","evidence-weighing","feedback-loop-detection"],"sops":["mechanism-edge-creation"]} |
Construct the directed causal graph by creating mechanism edges between the variables identified in the variable-identification phase. Each edge must carry a plain-language description of the underlying mechanism and at least one evidence citation.
CC must treat each proposed edge as a hypothesis, not a fact. For every mechanism edge created, the description should answer three questions: what is the pathway, under what conditions does it hold, and what would falsify it. Edges without a plausible mechanism description are placeholders and must be revisited. The goal is a graph where every arrow is defensible, not merely plausible.
| Metric | S | M | L |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanism edges created | 10 | 25 | 50 |
| Mechanism descriptions | 5 | 15 | 30 |
| Evidence citations | 8 | 20 | 40 |
| Metric | Target | Current | Status |
|-------------------------|--------|---------|--------|
| Mechanism edges created | S:10 / M:25 / L:50 | 0 | ⬜ |
| Mechanism descriptions | S:5 / M:15 / L:30 | 0 | ⬜ |
| Evidence citations | S:8 / M:20 / L:40 | 0 | ⬜ |
Cannot exit until 80% of budget met. Print state ledger before each iteration decision.
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Tactic | When to use |
|---|---|
| counterfactual-reasoning | Tactic for reasoning about what would happen if variables were different — supports causal identification and intervention analysis. |
| evidence-weighing | Tactic for assessing the strength and relevance of evidence for causal claims — distinguishes correlation from causation. |
| feedback-loop-detection | Tactic for identifying circular causation — detect feedback loops, classify as reinforcing or balancing, document loop structure. |
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use |
|---|---|
| mechanism-edge-creation | SOP for creating a causal mechanism edge — documents how one variable causes changes in another. |