gap-analysis

name	gap-analysis
description	Gap Analysis Campaign — identify, classify, validate, and prioritize research gaps via systematic evidence mapping. 5 strategies (gap-identification, gap-classification, gap-validation, gap-prioritization, gap-synthesis), 3 tactics, 12 subagent SOPs.
execution	campaign
dependencies	{"strategies":["deep-insight-gap-identification","deep-insight-gap-prioritization","gap-classification","gap-synthesis-strategy","gap-validation"],"sops":["context-checkpoint","context-init"]}

Gap Analysis

Identify, classify, validate, and prioritize research gaps via systematic evidence mapping.

Design Philosophy

This campaign is a strategy book — CC reads, internalizes, and autonomously constructs an approach. The SKILL.md files are textbooks, not scripts. CC decides execution order, depth, and iteration based on research context.

Strategy Routing

Signal	Strategy
Search for gaps, identify what is missing, concept matrix, keyword extraction	→ gap-identification
Classify gap types, Miles 7-type, Müller-Bloch 6-type	→ gap-classification
Verify gap authenticity, cross-database verification, temporal sensitivity, false gaps	→ gap-validation
Rank priority, AHRQ PiCMe, feasibility, importance	→ gap-prioritization
Generate report, evidence map, research agenda, concept matrix	→ gap-synthesis-strategy

Available Tactics

• evidence-mapping — systematic evidence map construction
• cross-validation — multi-source gap authenticity verification
• prioritization-scoring — multi-dimensional gap scoring and ranking

Available SOPs

Import (5): web-search, web-research, paper-overview, paper-search, paper-research

Subagent (12): gap-keyword-extraction, concept-matrix-construction, egm-construction, gap-typology-classification, ahrq-reason-classification, cross-database-verification, false-gap-filtering, temporal-sensitivity-testing, multi-criteria-scoring, stakeholder-confirmation, evidence-grading, gap-synthesis

Shared (2): evidence-synthesis, multi-stakeholder-simulation

Context Management

context-checkpoint after each strategy completes. Accumulated state persists across strategies within a campaign run.

Available Strategies

Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.

Strategy	When to use
deep-insight-gap-identification	Identify research gaps via PICOS frameworks, concept matrices, evidence gap maps, keyword extraction, citation analysis, and topic modeling. Systematic discovery of what is missing in the literature.
deep-insight-gap-prioritization	Score and rank validated gaps on importance, feasibility, novelty, and urgency. Multi-criteria decision analysis with stakeholder confirmation.
gap-classification	Classify identified gaps using Miles 7-type taxonomy and AHRQ 4-reason framework. Determines gap type (theoretical, methodological, empirical, etc.) and root cause of gap existence.
gap-synthesis-strategy	Compile all gap analysis products into a coherent final report with evidence gap maps, research agenda, and concept matrices.
gap-validation	Validate gap authenticity via cross-database verification, temporal sensitivity testing, and false-gap filtering. Ensures gaps are genuine absences, not search artifacts.

Available SOPs

Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.

SOP	When to use
context-checkpoint	Append research process and results to the current Phase's context file. Each append MUST contain >=500 lines of markdown covering both process and results. Use this skill at plan-designated checkpoint points — typically after each strategy completes or at key decision nodes within a research Phase.
context-init	Create a new context file for a research Phase. Called once at Phase start to initialize the file that subsequent context-checkpoint calls will append to. Use this skill whenever a new research Phase begins and a fresh context file is needed.