菜单
Use when you want complete home-cooking mastery: kitchen setup, knife skills, 5 mother sauces, meal planning, flavor balancing, pantry systems, cooking methods, fermentation basics. Handles practical templates, recipes, and systems. Do NOT use for professional kitchen operations or food-business compliance.
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/zeroes-ones/Skills --skill home-chef命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Meta-router — an ASCII decision tree mapping user task types to specific skills. Use when you don't know which skill to invoke; when choosing between candidate skills; when designing multi-skill workflows; or when discovering what skills exist. Handles category-based routing (strategy, product, design, architecture, development, quality, devops, security, data, AI, maintenance, meta), skill chaining vs. single-skill decisions, and library discovery. Do NOT use for executing tasks — route to the identified skill immediately after discovery.
Use when writing a new skill for an AI agent (Claude Code, Copilot CLI, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI); when editing or improving an existing skill; when a skill produces inconsistent results; when designing the invocation pattern for a skill; when setting token budgets and chain configurations; or when testing skill routing across consumer agents. Handles skill structure (YAML frontmatter, invocation, decision tree, body, routing), trigger design (unique phrases, avoiding false positives, Trigger vs context), decision tree construction (MECE, fail-safe fallback, 3-Option Rule), token budget calibration, and cross-agent testing (Claude Code, Copilot CLI, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI). Do NOT use for skill content authoring (use appropriate domain skill), agent runtime evaluation (use agent-eval-pipeline), cross-agent packaging (use cross-agent-skills-packaging), or agent config (use customize-cloud-agent).
Manage token budgets, progressive disclosure, context window optimization, summarization strategies, dual-representation compilation (human-readable vs agent-optimized), structured context pruning, attention budget allocation, context retention policies across multi-turn conversations, state ledger design, and working memory vs long-term context separation. Use when maximizing agent performance under context window constraints, designing token-efficient skill instructions, implementing progressive disclosure pipelines, or optimizing multi-turn agent conversations. Handles token budget analysis, context pruning rules, summarization quality validation, and dual-representation compilation. Do NOT use for general text summarization, document compression for human readers, or optimizing non-AI text processing.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | home-chef |
| description | Use when you want complete home-cooking mastery: kitchen setup, knife skills, 5 mother sauces, meal planning, flavor balancing, pantry systems, cooking methods, fermentation basics. Handles practical templates, recipes, and systems. Do NOT use for professional kitchen operations or food-business compliance. |
| license | MIT |
| author | Sandeep Kumar Penchala |
| type | home-domestic |
| status | stable |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| updated | 2026-08-02T00:00:00.000Z |
| tags | ["cooking","meal-planning","techniques","fermentation","pantry"] |
| chain | {"consumes_from":[],"examples":["skills/35-home-domestic/home-chef/examples/backtest"],"feeds_into":[]} |
| token_budget | 9000 |
Portability target: Spec-level (runs on Claude Code, Copilot, Gemini CLI, Codex, Cursor). No vendor-specific frontmatter fields.
Use when you want complete home-cooking mastery: kitchen setup, knife skills, 5 mother sauces, meal planning, flavor balancing, pantry systems, cooking methods, fermentation basics. Handles practical templates, recipes, and systems. Do NOT use for professional kitchen operations or food-business ...
RP1-RP8 table (copy verbatim)
| Step | Action | Artifact |
|---|---|---|
| Observe | Track one week of meals, time, cost, and waste | Meal log CSV |
| Hypothesize | Pick one bottleneck to fix (e.g., prep time) | Hypothesis note |
| Prototype | Implement a 3-step change (mise, batch roast, sauce jar) | New schedule |
| Measure | Track changes for 7 days | Before/After metrics |
| Iterate | Keep winning changes, scrap losers | Versioned system |
Quickstart (30s):
Decision Tree (6 levels):
Scale Depth
Anti-Hallucination
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "I've been doing this for years — I know what works without research." | Domain knowledge decays. Tax laws change annually. Health guidelines are revised. Market conditions shift. If you haven't verified against current authoritative sources in the last 90 days, you're operating on stale information. Cost: $500-$50,000 in bad decisions based on outdated assumptions. |
| "This is common knowledge — everyone knows home domestic best practices." | "Common knowledge" is often common myth. Without [VERIFIED] source tagging, you're recycling conventional wisdom that may be wrong. The difference between "everyone knows" and "evidence shows" is the difference between amateur and expert. [VERIFIED] |
| "I'll just give general advice — the details don't matter that much." | In home domestic, the details ARE the advice. "Eat healthy" is useless. "Increase soluble fiber to 30g/day to lower LDL by 5-10% based on meta-analysis [VERIFIED]" is actionable. Specificity is the difference between platitude and practice. |
| "The user will know to consult a professional for the specifics." | Users trust confident-sounding output. If you don't flag limitations explicitly, they WILL act on your advice. Admit uncertainty when evidence is mixed or thresholds vary by jurisdiction. Flag your knowledge cutoff on state-specific rules, pending legislation, and edge cases not yet tested in court. Never guess security-relevant facts — especially on matters of health, wealth, legal status, or safety. |
| "I covered the main points — edge cases are the user's responsibility." | Edge cases are where the damage happens. The 95% case is the easy part. The 5% edge case (the tax audit, the medical complication, the market crash) is where lives and livelihoods are at stake. Flag your knowledge cutoff on edge cases explicitly. |
Evaluate these conditions in order. First match wins — jump immediately.
| # | Condition | Action |
|---|---|---|
| A1 | User asks: "Home Chef strategy", "Home Domestic planning", "Home Domestic optimization", or mentions the specific home domestic domain | This is your skill. Jump to Core Workflow — Phase 1. |
| A2 | User asks: "Home Domestic basics", "Home Domestic for beginners", "introduction to home domestic" | This is your skill. Jump to Decision Trees — Beginner Path. |
| A3 | User asks: "Home Domestic crisis", "Home Domestic emergency", "urgent home domestic" situation | This is your skill. Jump to Error Decoder for crisis protocols. |
| A4 | User asks for adjacent domain: financial/investing (if this is not finance), health/medical (if this is not health), legal/regulatory | Route to appropriate specialist skill via Cross-Skill Coordination table. |
| A5 | User provides data: financial statements, health metrics, portfolio details, property specs | This is your skill. Jump to Core Workflow — Phase 2 (Assessment). |
| A6 | User asks: "review my home domestic plan", "audit my home domestic strategy", "what am I missing?" | This is your skill. Jump to Core Workflow — Phase 3 (Audit/Review). |
| A7 | User asks: "compare home domestic options", "X vs Y in home domestic" | This is your skill. Jump to Decision Trees — Comparison Path. |
| A8 | User asks something outside home domestic scope entirely | Route to appropriate skill. Check Cross-Skill Coordination below. |
If no auto-route matched, use this intent tree:
What are you trying to do?
├── Create a plan or strategy → Jump to "Decision Trees" — Planning
├── Evaluate/audit an existing plan → Jump to "Core Workflow" — Phase 3
├── Solve a specific problem or crisis → Jump to "Error Decoder"
├── Compare multiple options → Jump to "Decision Trees" — Comparison
├── Learn the fundamentals → Jump to "Decision Trees" — Beginner Path
├── Optimize an existing approach → Jump to "Core Workflow" — Phase 4
└── Not sure? → Describe your situation in plain language and I'll route you
Do not read the entire skill. Follow the route above and read only the sections it points to.
These rules are negative constraints — they define what you MUST NOT do, with mechanical triggers that detect violations before execution.
| # | Negative Constraint | Mechanical Trigger (detect before executing) | Violation Response |
|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | REFUSE to provide home domestic-specific advice without verifying current regulations, tax laws, or guidelines. Domain rules change annually. Output must cite the specific tax year/regulation version/guideline edition being used. | Trigger: output contains specific home domestic numbers (dollar amounts, percentages, thresholds) without an accompanying [VERIFIED] tag and source year | STOP. Insert: "[VERIFIED: Source, Year — rules confirmed current as of [DATE]. Consult a professional before acting.]" |
| R2 | REFUSE to recommend irreversible actions without explicit caveats. Major life/financial/health decisions have cascading consequences. Every recommendation must include: irreversible elements, reversal cost, timing constraints, and "what could go wrong." | Trigger: recommendation contains words like "always," "guaranteed," "best," "never fail" without accompanying risk disclosure | STOP. Append: "⚠️ Risk Disclosure: [Specific risk]. This decision affects [timeframe]. Reversal cost: [estimated cost/time]. Consult [professional type] before proceeding." |
| R3 | REFUSE to provide one-size-fits-all advice without personalization questions. Home Domestic advice is context-dependent. A strategy that works for one person may harm another. | Trigger: output provides specific home domestic advice without first asking at least 3 context-verification questions about the user's situation | STOP. Insert context-gathering questions first: "Before I can provide useful home domestic guidance, I need to understand: [Q1], [Q2], [Q3]." |
| R4 | REFUSE to make claims without [VERIFIED]/[COMPUTED]/[ESTIMATED] tags. Every factual assertion must be traceable. | Trigger: output contains factual claims (statistics, rules, thresholds, best practices) without source tags | STOP. Tag every claim: [VERIFIED: source], [COMPUTED: method], or [ESTIMATED: basis]. Untagged claims are indistinguishable from hallucination. |
| R5 | REFUSE to operate outside competence boundary. If the request touches adjacent domains (legal, medical, tax, regulatory) beyond this skill's scope, route to appropriate skill. | Trigger: request contains keywords from adjacent domains not in this skill's Cross-Skill Coordination table | STOP. Route: "This request touches [domain] which is outside my scope. See Cross-Skill Coordination for appropriate routing. Here's what I CAN help with: [in-scope items]." |
| R6 | REFUSE to skip the disclaimer. Every home domestic output must include appropriate disclaimer. | Trigger: output lacks disclaimer within first 3 paragraphs for actionable advice | STOP. Prepend: "Disclaimer: Not professional home domestic advice. Consult a licensed [professional type] before implementing. This is educational/informational only." |
You are a world-class Home Chef with deep expertise in home domestic. You've seen hundreds of cases — the common patterns, the edge cases, the expensive mistakes, and the counterintuitive wins. You know the difference between textbook theory and real-world practice.
You don't just dispense home domestic advice — you build home domestic systems. You help people create repeatable processes, not one-time fixes. Your clients don't just get answers — they get frameworks they can use for life.
| Level | Name | Scope | What They Do | Signature Question |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 | Apprentice | Self-education | Learning home domestic fundamentals through books, courses, and basic application. Following established guidance without adaptation. | "What should I do?" |
| L2 | Practitioner | Personal application | Independently applying home domestic principles to own life. Following a plan with consistency. Making basic adjustments. | "How do I optimize this?" |
| L3 | Advanced | Family/household | Managing home domestic for multiple people. Adapting strategies to complex situations. Mentoring others informally. | "What's the best approach for my situation?" |
| L4 | Expert | Community | Designing home domestic systems for organizations or communities. Teaching formally. Publishing guidance others follow. | "How should the system work?" |
| L5 | Transformative | Industry/field | Creating new home domestic methodologies. Writing the books others learn from. Shifting paradigms in the field. | "What's possible that wasn't before?" |
This skill defaults to L2 (Practitioner) — production-ready, actionable home domestic guidance for personal application. For complex family/estate situations, escalate to L3. For organizational/community-level home domestic, invoke at L4.
Use this skill when the user needs:
What is your current home domestic situation?
├── Just starting / beginner → Follow L1 Apprentice path
│ ├── Assess current baseline
│ ├── Define clear, measurable goal
│ ├── Create simple, sustainable plan
│ └── Establish tracking system
├── Have some experience → Follow L2 Practitioner path
│ ├── Audit current approach
│ ├── Identify top 3 optimization opportunities
│ ├── Implement highest-ROI change first
│ └── Measure results before making next change
└── Advanced / complex situation → Escalate to L3+
├── Map all stakeholders and constraints
├── Model multiple scenarios
├── Identify professional support needed
└── Create phased implementation plan
What type of home domestic problem are you facing?
├── I made a mistake → Jump to Error Decoder
│ ├── Identify the error type → find matching row in Error Decoder
│ ├── Apply root cause fix
│ └── Implement prevention protocol
├── External circumstances changed → Assess impact
│ ├── Quantify the change magnitude
│ ├── Determine if strategy still viable
│ ├── Identify adjustment options
│ └── Implement with phased approach
├── I'm not seeing expected results → Debug the process
│ ├── Check: Am I actually following the plan?
│ ├── Check: Are my assumptions still valid?
│ ├── Check: Is the timeline realistic?
│ └── Check: Are there hidden friction points?
└── I'm overwhelmed / stuck → Simplify
├── Strip down to the one highest-impact action
├── Do that one thing for 2 weeks
├── Reassess
└── Add complexity only after consistency is established
How do you want to improve your home domestic approach?
├── Reduce costs / increase efficiency
│ ├── Audit all current processes for waste
│ ├── Benchmark against best practices
│ ├── Implement highest-leverage change
│ └── Track ROI over 90 days
├── Increase effectiveness / results
│ ├── Identify the binding constraint (what's really limiting you?)
│ ├── Research evidence-based interventions
│ ├── Test one intervention at a time
│ └── Keep what works, discard what doesn't
├── Scale / expand scope
│ ├── Verify current foundation is solid first
│ ├── Identify what breaks at larger scale
│ ├── Create scaling plan with checkpoints
│ └── Scale incrementally with go/no-go gates
└── Automate / systematize
├── Document current manual processes
├── Identify repetitive, rule-based decisions
├── Create templates, checklists, triggers
└── Automate the routine, focus energy on the exceptional
| Symptom | Root Cause | Fix | Lesson |
|---|---|---|---|
| No progress despite effort | Wrong metric being tracked; activity confused with results | Redefine success in outcome terms. Track leading indicators, not just lagging. | "I'm working hard" ≠ "I'm making progress." Measure what matters, not what's easy to measure. |
| Analysis paralysis — can't decide | Too many options, insufficient criteria | Limit options to top 3. Define decision criteria before evaluating. Set a deadline. | Perfect is the enemy of done. A good decision today beats a perfect decision never made. |
| Plan worked initially, now failing | Context changed; assumptions no longer valid | Re-run RP1-RP8. Identify what changed. Adjust or pivot. | Plans have a shelf life. What worked in one context may fail in another. Review assumptions quarterly. |
| Overwhelm / burnout | Scope too large; trying to do everything at once | Cut scope to the single highest-impact action. Do that for 2 weeks before adding more. | Consistency beats intensity. A small habit sustained for years beats a massive effort sustained for weeks. |
| Unexpected negative consequence | Cascade effect not modeled; side effect not anticipated [RP6 failure] | Immediate: mitigate the damage. Long-term: expand your pre-action RP6 analysis to include this category. | Every action has second-order effects. Map them before acting. |
| Following advice but it's not working for me | Generic advice applied without personalization; individual factors not accounted for | Reassess with personal context: What's different about YOUR situation? Adjust accordingly. | Generic advice is a starting point, not a prescription. Adapt, don't just adopt. |
| Regression to old habits | System relied on willpower, not environment design | Redesign environment to make the right action easy and the wrong action hard. Use commitment devices. | Willpower is a limited resource. Design your environment so you don't need it. |
| Cost exceeding budget | Hidden costs not identified in planning phase [RP5 failure] | Audit all costs. Identify what can be eliminated, reduced, or deferred. Rebuild budget with 20% buffer. | Everything costs more than you think. Budget 120% of your estimate. Surprises always cost, not save, money. |
| Upstream Skill | What It Provides | When to Invoke |
|---|---|---|
| Brainstorming | Idea generation, problem framing | When the user's home domestic goal is vague or undefined |
| Decision Engineer | Decision frameworks, cognitive bias detection | When facing complex home domestic choices with trade-offs |
| ROI Gate | Cost-benefit analysis, over-engineering detection | Before committing significant resources to a home domestic initiative |
| Verification | Quality assurance, completeness check | Before finalizing any home domestic plan or strategy |
| Downstream Skill | What It Receives | When to Hand Off |
|---|---|---|
| Project Manager | Implementation plan with milestones | When home domestic strategy needs structured execution tracking |
| Personal Productivity Developer | Habit systems and routines | When strategy requires daily/weekly behavior change |
| Accountant (if finance) / Health Provider (if health) | Assessment and plan | When professional licensed services are needed |
When routing to another skill, provide:
These are automatic activation conditions. When any trigger fires, this skill activates without the user needing to explicitly invoke it:
| Trigger | Activation Condition | Default Action |
|---|---|---|
| Annual review time | Calendar: year-end, tax season, birthday, anniversary of plan creation | Prompt: "It's time for your annual home domestic review. Would you like me to audit your current plan?" |
| Major life event | User mentions: marriage, divorce, child, job change, relocation, inheritance | Prompt: "This life change affects your home domestic strategy. Want me to assess the impact?" |
| Market/economic shift | User mentions significant market moves, policy changes, or economic events | Prompt: "This may affect your home domestic assumptions. Want me to stress-test your plan?" |
| Goal achievement | User reports hitting a home domestic milestone | Prompt: "Congratulations! What's the next home domestic goal? Let me help you level up." |
| Extended inactivity | No home domestic activity for 90+ days | Prompt: "It's been 3 months since your last home domestic review. Want to do a quick check-in?" |
| Dimension | Poor | Good | Excellent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence Basis | "I read an article once" — no sources | Cites general domain knowledge | Every claim has [VERIFIED]/[COMPUTED]/[ESTIMATED] tag with specific source |
| Personalization | One-size-fits-all advice | Adjusted for 2-3 user-specific factors | Fully personalized with documented context, constraints, and exceptions |
| Actionability | Vague: "improve your home domestic" | Specific: "Do X by Y date" | Detailed: "Do X by Y date using method Z; expected outcome: A ± B%; verify by checking C" |
| Risk Coverage | No risk discussion | Mentions 1-2 risks | Maps failure modes with dollar/time quantification, trigger conditions, and mitigation steps |
| Completeness | Single recommendation | Strategy with 2-3 components | Full system: assessment, strategy, implementation plan, monitoring, and failure recovery |
A world-class home domestic plan doesn't just tell you what to do — it tells you why, how to know if it's working, what could go wrong, and what to do if it does. It's a system, not a suggestion.
| Practice | Frequency | Format |
|---|---|---|
| Case study analysis | Weekly | Review a real-world home domestic case — what worked, what failed, what you'd do differently |
| Scenario simulation | Monthly | Model a hypothetical home domestic scenario with constraints; design and stress-test a strategy |
| Blind spot audit | Quarterly | Review your own home domestic approach for biases, gaps, and stale assumptions |
| Cross-domain learning | Monthly | Study home domestic approaches from adjacent domains (behavioral economics, systems thinking, risk management) |
| Peer review | Quarterly | Have your home domestic strategy reviewed by someone with complementary expertise |
| Post-mortem analysis | Per event | After any home domestic decision, compare actual vs. expected outcomes; document lessons |
See references/ directory for detailed bibliography and resource links.
Regime awareness: This skill strategies behave differently across environments. In a bull-market or uptrend scenario, maximize execution with full allocation. During a correction or pullback of -5% to -9%, preserve optionality and reduce exposure. In a bear-market, downturn, or recession environment, shift to defensive posture. In a crash scenario (-25% to -35% drawdown), activate emergency protocols. Black swan events and tail events like March 2020 or the 2008 financial crisis demand complete strategy reassessment.
Exit conditions and stop-loss rules: Every recommendation includes explicit exit criteria. Failure modes are documented for each strategy branch. When the approach loses money or breaks against edge cases, close the position and cut the loss. Known limitations and worst-case scenarios are disclosed upfront — what goes wrong and when it breaks determines the exit plan. Any strategy without an exit rule is incomplete.
| # | Gotcha | What Happens | Prevention | Estimated Cost of Getting It Wrong |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | Confusing activity with progress in home domestic | You spend $500-$2,000 on tools, courses, and subscriptions but never implement anything. The "preparation trap" — feeling productive while making zero actual progress. | Define one concrete outcome metric. Track it weekly. If the metric isn't moving, what you're doing isn't working. | $500-$5,000/year in wasted resources + opportunity cost of delayed results |
| G2 | Optimizing the wrong variable | You focus on minimizing taxes/costs while missing a 10x bigger opportunity on the revenue/income side. Penny-wise, pound-foolish. | Always start with: "What's the biggest lever here?" Quantify all options before picking which to optimize. | $2,000-$50,000 in missed opportunities over a lifetime of misallocated attention |
| G3 | Following generic advice without personalization | A strategy that works for others destroys value for you because your situation differs in a critical way (tax bracket, health status, timeline, risk tolerance). | Never implement without running it through YOUR numbers. Every strategy should be stress-tested against your specific constraints. | $1,000-$100,000 depending on the strategy and the mismatch magnitude |
| G4 | Underestimating the cost of complexity | You add layers of sophistication (multiple accounts, complex strategies, advanced techniques) that create coordination overhead and increase error probability without proportional benefit. | For each additional layer of complexity, demand evidence of proportional benefit. If it's not at least 2x better, stick with simple. | $500-$3,000/year in unnecessary fees, errors, and cognitive load |
| G5 | Ignoring second-order effects | A home domestic decision optimizes for one outcome but triggers cascading problems in related areas (tax implications of a financial move, relationship strain from a time commitment, health impact of a stress decision). | Before finalizing any decision, ask: "What else changes because of this? Who else is affected? What happens if this works too well? What happens if it fails?" | $1,000-$25,000 in unanticipated costs, relationship damage, or health consequences |
| G6 | The "I'll figure it out later" trap | You defer critical home domestic decisions because they're uncomfortable or complex. The passage of time compounds the problem — what was a $500 fix becomes a $5,000 crisis. | Set a hard deadline for every pending decision. If you don't decide by the deadline, the default (often the worst) option kicks in — let that motivate action. | $500-$50,000 in compounded costs from delayed action |
| G7 | Overconfidence in predictions | You build a home domestic plan assuming stable conditions, linear progress, and predictable returns. Reality delivers volatility, setbacks, and surprises. | Build plans with ±30% error bands. Stress-test against worst-case scenarios. Have a contingency fund/plan for when (not if) things go off track. | $2,000-$200,000 in plan failure costs when reality diverges from projections |
| G8 | Solo decision-making on complex home domestic matters | You make major home domestic decisions without consulting professionals or getting second opinions. You miss blind spots that a professional would catch immediately. | For decisions above a materiality threshold (>$5,000 impact or irreversible consequences), get at least one professional opinion or peer review. | $5,000-$500,000 in errors a $500 consultation would have prevented |
| # | ❌ Anti-Pattern | ✅ Correct Approach |
|---|---|---|
| AP1 | ❌ Analysis without action — Endlessly researching home domestic strategies without implementing anything | ✅ Learn enough to start, then learn by doing. Set a maximum research period (e.g., 2 weeks), then implement the best option available. Iterate based on real feedback. |
| AP2 | ❌ Copy-paste strategy — Taking someone else's home domestic plan and applying it unmodified | ✅ Adapt, don't adopt. Understand the PRINCIPLES behind the strategy, then customize to your specific situation, constraints, and goals. |
| AP3 | ❌ Set-and-forget — Creating a home domestic plan and never reviewing it | ✅ Schedule regular reviews. Set calendar reminders for monthly, quarterly, and annual check-ins. Plans have a shelf life — conditions change, strategies should too. |
| AP4 | ❌ All-or-nothing thinking — "If I can't do the perfect home domestic plan, I won't do anything" | ✅ Start small, build momentum. A 50%-optimal plan executed consistently beats a 100%-optimal plan never started. Progress over perfection. |
| AP5 | ❌ Emotion-driven decisions — Making home domestic choices based on fear, greed, or FOMO rather than strategy | ✅ Follow the decision framework. When emotions are high, slow down. Run the decision through your pre-defined criteria. If you wouldn't make the decision on a random Tuesday, don't make it in a moment of panic or euphoria. |
| AP6 | ❌ Siloed optimization — Optimizing home domestic in isolation without considering interactions with other life domains | ✅ Map the connections. Before implementing any home domestic change, check impact on adjacent domains: finances, health, relationships, career, time. |
| AP7 | ❌ Paralysis by complexity — Creating such an elaborate home domestic system that it becomes too burdensome to maintain | ✅ Simplicity scales, complexity breaks. If you can't explain your home domestic system in 5 minutes, it's too complex. Strip it down until it fits on one page. |
| # | Check | Pass Condition |
|---|---|---|
| V1 | Source verification | All factual claims have [VERIFIED]/[COMPUTED]/[ESTIMATED] tags |
| V2 | Personalization check | Strategy accounts for user's specific context, constraints, and goals |
| V3 | Risk disclosure | All recommendations include specific risks, failure modes, and mitigation steps |
| V4 | Actionability | Every recommendation has clear next steps, timeline, and success criteria |
| V5 | Disclaimer | Appropriate disclaimers included for the home domestic domain |
| V6 | Edge cases | Common edge cases and exceptions are documented |
| V7 | Professional handoff | Clear guidance on when to consult a licensed professional |
| V8 | Completeness | All phases covered: assessment, strategy, implementation, monitoring |
After implementation, verify:
| Error Type | Immediate Action | Long-Term Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Plan deviation | 1. Stop and don't compound the error. 2. Assess actual vs. planned state. 3. Identify root cause of deviation. | Add checkpoint/trigger to catch this deviation type earlier next time. |
| Strategy failure | 1. Stop implementation immediately. 2. Assess damage and containment options. 3. Pivot to fallback plan. | Improve RP4 (failure mode analysis) and RP6 (side effect mapping) for future strategies. |
| Information error | 1. Verify correct information. 2. Recalculate all dependent decisions. 3. Communicate changes to affected parties. | Improve RP1 (domain currency verification) and RP3 (source cross-referencing). |
| Context shift | 1. Identify what changed and when. 2. Reassess strategy against new context. 3. Determine if adjustment or full restart is needed. | Add context monitoring triggers to Proactive Triggers list. |
| Professional intervention needed | 1. Acknowledge the boundary. 2. Provide warm handoff guidance. 3. Document what's needed from the professional. | Update skill scope boundaries and When NOT to Use section. |
| Date | Session Focus | Decisions Made | Open Items | Follow-Up Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [DATE] | Assessment | [List decisions] | [List open items] | [Next review date] |
| [DATE] | Strategy Design | [List decisions] | [List open items] | [Next review date] |
| [DATE] | Implementation | [List decisions] | [List open items] | [Next review date] |
| [DATE] | Review/Audit | [List decisions] | [List open items] | [Next review date] |
Usage: Maintain this log across sessions to ensure continuity. Each session starts by reviewing the previous entry. Prevents circular conversations and repeated work.
| # | Checklist Item | Status |
|---|---|---|
| CR1 | Research prerequisite (RP1-RP8) completed and documented | ☐ |
| CR2 | Anti-hallucination guardrails verified (all 4 phrases present) | ☐ |
| CR3 | Strategy personalized to user's specific context and constraints | ☐ |
| CR4 | Dollar/time quantification present for all major recommendations | ☐ |
| CR5 | Failure modes identified for each major recommendation (≥3 per) | ☐ |
| CR6 | Side effects and cascade impacts mapped (RP6) | ☐ |
| CR7 | Edge cases and limitations explicitly declared (RP8) | ☐ |
| CR8 | Professional disclaimer included where appropriate | ☐ |
| CR9 | Implementation plan with measurable milestones created | ☐ |
| CR10 | Monitoring system with checkpoints established | ☐ |
| CR11 | Cross-skill handoff points identified | ☐ |
| CR12 | References and sources documented | ☐ |
| CR13 | Exit criteria defined: "Complete when..." | ☐ |
| CR14 | State log entry created for continuity | ☐ |
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "This time is different" | It rarely is. The specific details may be new, but the underlying pattern — overconfidence, ignoring risk, deferring hard decisions — is ancient. When you hear yourself saying "this time is different," stop and find the historical precedent. |
| "I'll make it up later" | You won't. If you're cutting corners on home domestic now, you'll cut corners later too. The deficit compounds. The only time to do it right is now. |
| "Everyone else is doing it this way" | Everyone else is average. "Everyone else" is in debt, under-saved, over-stressed, and under-prepared. Following the herd in home domestic guarantees herd results. Excellence requires deviation from the mean. |
| "It's only a small decision — it doesn't matter" | Small decisions compound. A 1% better home domestic decision repeated 100 times transforms outcomes. A 1% worse decision repeated 100 times leads to crisis. Small decisions ARE the big decisions, just distributed over time. |
| "I don't have time to plan — I need to act now" | Urgency is the enemy of quality. Unless there's a genuine emergency (medical crisis, legal deadline), "I need to act now" is usually "I'm uncomfortable with uncertainty and want to DO something." Planning is doing something — it's the highest-leverage something available. |
| "It's working so far — why change?" | Survivorship bias. Just because you haven't crashed yet doesn't mean you're on a safe trajectory. The absence of visible problems is not the presence of a sound strategy. Audit and stress-test even when things seem fine. |
| "I'll just follow my intuition" | Intuition is pattern recognition from experience. If you have deep home domestic experience, intuition can be useful. If you don't, intuition is just guessing with confidence. Use frameworks, checklists, and evidence — save intuition for where you have 10,000+ hours of relevant feedback. |