القائمة
When you face a constraint that seems to block progress, find a workaround. There is ALWAYS a workaround.
يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.
اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
يتجاوز الأمر المباشر Prompt المخصّص للمراجعة. افحص المصدر قبل تشغيله.
npx skills add https://github.com/benjam3n/reasoningtool --skill cnwيبقى الأمر في سطر واحد. مرّر أفقيًا لمراجعته كاملًا قبل النسخ.
تفضّل نسخة محلية؟ نزّل الملفات المتاحة حاليًا لدى SkillsMP.
Route any input through a branching question tree to narrow down the optimal response strategy before writing. Two stages — PERCEIVE (classify input) then ACT (select response). Covers all prompt types.
Generate exhaustive guesses about user input using ALL search methods with coverage tracking. Guessing is SEARCH through possibility space. Tracks space created vs space covered to ensure comprehensive exploration.
Systematically evaluate and select from a set of guesses, options, or possibilities. Combines ARAW analysis with prioritization to determine which guesses are strong, weak, actionable, or eliminable.
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
عرض SKILL.md
| name | cnw |
| description | When you face a constraint that seems to block progress, find a workaround. There is ALWAYS a workaround. |
| output | {"format":"prose"} |
Input: $ARGUMENTS
When you face a constraint that seems to block progress, NEVER give up. There is ALWAYS a workaround.
Most successful people started with constraints others would consider fatal. They found workarounds that others didn't think to look for. The arbitrage: systematically find workarounds that ad hoc thinking misses.
Vague constraints have no solutions. Precise constraints have many.
Constraint types:
| Type | Example | Typical Workaround Direction |
|---|---|---|
| Resource (money) | "Can't afford X" | Bootstrap, barter, find it free, earn it |
| Resource (time) | "Don't have time" | Delegate, automate, reduce scope, parallelize |
| Access | "Can't reach Y" | Find intermediary, find alternative, build own |
| Authority | "Not allowed to Z" | Get permission, find who can, reframe |
| Knowledge | "Don't know how" | Learn, hire, find who does, use AI |
| Skill | "Can't do X well" | Practice, partner, tool up, lower bar |
| Physical | "Not physically possible" | Redefine, approximate, find adjacent |
| Legal/regulatory | "Not permitted" | Different jurisdiction, different structure, comply |
Try each level in order. Stop when you find one that works:
Level 1: Eliminate — Is the constraint actually necessary?
Level 2: Substitute — Can something else serve the same function?
Level 3: Borrow — Can someone else provide what you need?
Level 4: Sequence — Can you do it in a different order?
Level 5: Transform — Can you change the nature of the constraint?
Level 6: Endure — Can you push through despite the constraint?
For each applicable level, generate concrete options:
| Level | Workaround | Feasibility | Effort | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [level] | [specific workaround] | H/M/L | H/M/L | H/M/L |
Generate at least 5 workarounds before evaluating any.
For each workaround:
Common reasons people don't see workarounds:
Honest question: Do you WANT to find a workaround, or does the constraint serve a hidden purpose?
CONSTRAINT WORKAROUND:
Constraint: [precise description]
Type: [resource/access/authority/knowledge/skill/physical/legal]
Genuine: [yes / actually a perceived constraint]
Workarounds found:
| # | Level | Workaround | Feasibility | New Risks |
|---|-------|-----------|-------------|-----------|
| 1 | [level] | [what] | [H/M/L] | [what new problems] |
Recommended: [best workaround]
Why: [feasible + doesn't create worse problems + aligned with goal]
Self-sabotage check: [any hidden reasons for accepting the constraint]