用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/benjam3n/reasoningtool --skill cnw命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Route any input through a branching question tree to narrow down the optimal response strategy before writing. Two stages — PERCEIVE (classify input) then ACT (select response). Covers all prompt types.
Generate exhaustive guesses about user input using ALL search methods with coverage tracking. Guessing is SEARCH through possibility space. Tracks space created vs space covered to ensure comprehensive exploration.
Systematically evaluate and select from a set of guesses, options, or possibilities. Combines ARAW analysis with prioritization to determine which guesses are strong, weak, actionable, or eliminable.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | cnw |
| description | When you face a constraint that seems to block progress, find a workaround. There is ALWAYS a workaround. |
| output | {"format":"prose"} |
Input: $ARGUMENTS
When you face a constraint that seems to block progress, NEVER give up. There is ALWAYS a workaround.
Most successful people started with constraints others would consider fatal. They found workarounds that others didn't think to look for. The arbitrage: systematically find workarounds that ad hoc thinking misses.
Vague constraints have no solutions. Precise constraints have many.
Constraint types:
| Type | Example | Typical Workaround Direction |
|---|---|---|
| Resource (money) | "Can't afford X" | Bootstrap, barter, find it free, earn it |
| Resource (time) | "Don't have time" | Delegate, automate, reduce scope, parallelize |
| Access | "Can't reach Y" | Find intermediary, find alternative, build own |
| Authority | "Not allowed to Z" | Get permission, find who can, reframe |
| Knowledge | "Don't know how" | Learn, hire, find who does, use AI |
| Skill | "Can't do X well" | Practice, partner, tool up, lower bar |
| Physical | "Not physically possible" | Redefine, approximate, find adjacent |
| Legal/regulatory | "Not permitted" | Different jurisdiction, different structure, comply |
Try each level in order. Stop when you find one that works:
Level 1: Eliminate — Is the constraint actually necessary?
Level 2: Substitute — Can something else serve the same function?
Level 3: Borrow — Can someone else provide what you need?
Level 4: Sequence — Can you do it in a different order?
Level 5: Transform — Can you change the nature of the constraint?
Level 6: Endure — Can you push through despite the constraint?
For each applicable level, generate concrete options:
| Level | Workaround | Feasibility | Effort | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [level] | [specific workaround] | H/M/L | H/M/L | H/M/L |
Generate at least 5 workarounds before evaluating any.
For each workaround:
Common reasons people don't see workarounds:
Honest question: Do you WANT to find a workaround, or does the constraint serve a hidden purpose?
CONSTRAINT WORKAROUND:
Constraint: [precise description]
Type: [resource/access/authority/knowledge/skill/physical/legal]
Genuine: [yes / actually a perceived constraint]
Workarounds found:
| # | Level | Workaround | Feasibility | New Risks |
|---|-------|-----------|-------------|-----------|
| 1 | [level] | [what] | [H/M/L] | [what new problems] |
Recommended: [best workaround]
Why: [feasible + doesn't create worse problems + aligned with goal]
Self-sabotage check: [any hidden reasons for accepting the constraint]