Skip to main content

pay-bands-market-data

Use when setting or revising pay bands — covers band structure, market data sources, compa-ratios, and band integrity.

الانتقال إلى التثبيت

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
ccashwell/agentic-hr
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٢٥ أبريل ٢٠٢٦ في ٢٣:٤٩
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
٠
التفرعات
٠

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
pay-bands-market-data
description
Use when setting or revising pay bands — covers band structure, market data sources, compa-ratios, and band integrity.
# Pay Bands and Market Data ## What a Pay Band Is A pay band defines the cash compensation range for a (level × job family × geography) combination. Bands have: - **Min**: minimum acceptable pay for the level - **Mid**: target pay; anchored to market percentile - **Max**: ceiling; out-of-band pay requires exception Width: typically 15–30% spread (max is 15–30% above min). Wider widths give flexibility; narrower widths force promotion to grow comp. ## Compa-Ratio Compa-ratio = actual pay ÷ midpoint. Used for diagnostics: - **>1.10**: above midpoint; appropriate for proven-at-level - **0.90–1.10**: in-band; expected range - **<0.90**: below band; investigate Aggregate compa-ratios useful for: - Spotting under-paid groups - Demographic gaps - Manager patterns (always low / always high) ## Market Data Sources | Source | Strengths | Weaknesses | |--------|-----------|------------| | **Pave** | Strong tech coverage; modern UX | Submission base skews tech / startups | | **Comprehensive** | Broad sector coverage | Setup heavier | | **Radford** | Tech enterprise standard; level-mapped | Expensive; dated participant model | | **Option Impact** (Compensia) | Equity benchmarks at early stage | Equity-focused | | **Salary.com / Glassdoor** | Free / low-cost | Submission bias; unverified | | **Levels.fyi** | Public, level-mapped tech data | Submission bias toward high-comp candidates | | **Survey participation** | Improves your data quality | Time investment | When choosing: match the source's submission base to your hiring market. A SaaS startup's data isn't reliable for hardware manufacturing. ## Setting Bands 1. Pick percentile target per level (per `compensation-philosophy`) 2. Pull market data for each (level × function × geo) cell 3. Apply percentile to get midpoint 4. Set min and max based on width policy (e.g., ±15% from mid) 5. Sanity-check overlaps between adjacent levels (some overlap is fine; large overlap means levels aren't differentiated enough) 6. Geo zones applied (Tier 1 SF/NY/Seattle; Tier 2 major US; Tier 3 lower-cost; international per local market) 7. Refresh annually; off-cycle if market moves materially ## Out-of-Band Pay Any actual pay outside the band is an exception. Reasons that justify: - New hire bridging large unvested equity from prior employer - Acquisition / acqui-hire compensation preservation - Counter-retention for genuinely exceptional, hard-to-replace talent - Geography pay preserved post-relocation policy change Reasons that don't: - "We had to to close them" (band is wrong, or this isn't the right candidate at this level) - Founder verbal commitment - Manager pressure - "We've always paid Y this much" Document every exception. Audit quarterly. ## Band Integrity Audit Quarterly: - Distribution of comp within bands by job family / level / geo - Out-of-band exceptions - Compa-ratio by demographic - Manager-by-manager comp distribution - New-hire offers vs. existing employees at same level (compression risk) Compression: when new hires get paid as much or more than longer-tenured existing employees at the same level. Common during hot markets; corrodes trust. Address via market refresh of existing employees, not by underpaying new hires. ## Band Communication - **Internal bands**: consider sharing with employees by their own level - **Job posting ranges**: legally required in many US jurisdictions - **Range on offer**: standard practice - **Band rationale**: how were these set? ## Common Failures - No bands; ad-hoc comp - Bands set once, never refreshed - Bands routinely violated (bands are ornamental) - Compression unaddressed - Manager sets pay without comp partner review - Geo strategy invented per case - Single data source over-relied on - Bands too wide (no upgrade pressure) or too narrow (forces unnecessary promotion) ## Cross-References - `compensation-strategist` agent - `compensation-philosophy` skill - `pay-equity-analysis` skill - `offer-strategy` skill - `career-leveling` skill ## Key References - Bock, L. (2015). *Work Rules!* - Practitioner work from Pave, Comprehensive, Radford - Public references: Buffer's published bands; Holloway Guide
عرض على GitHub