| name | speckit-specify |
| description | Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description. |
| compatibility | Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory |
| metadata | {"author":"github-spec-kit","source":"templates/commands/specify.md"} |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Pre-Execution Checks
Check for extension hooks (before specification):
- Check if
.specify/extensions.yml exists in the project root.
- If it exists, read it and look for entries under the
hooks.before_specify key
- If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
- Filter out hooks where
enabled is explicitly false. Treat hooks without an enabled field as enabled by default.
- For each remaining hook, do not attempt to interpret or evaluate hook
condition expressions:
- If the hook has no
condition field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
- If the hook defines a non-empty
condition, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
- For each executable hook, output the following based on its
optional flag:
- Optional hook (
optional: true):
## Extension Hooks
**Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
Command: `/{command}`
Description: {description}
Prompt: {prompt}
To execute: `/{command}`
- Mandatory hook (
optional: false):
## Extension Hooks
**Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
Executing: `/{command}`
EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
- If no hooks are registered or
.specify/extensions.yml does not exist, skip silently
Outline
The text the user typed after /speckit.specify in the triggering message is the feature description. Assume you always have it available in this conversation even if $ARGUMENTS appears literally below. Do not ask the user to repeat it unless they provided an empty command.
Given that feature description, do this:
-
Generate a concise short name (2-4 words) for the branch:
- Analyze the feature description and extract the most meaningful keywords
- Create a 2-4 word short name that captures the essence of the feature
- Use action-noun format when possible (e.g., "add-user-auth", "fix-payment-bug")
- Preserve technical terms and acronyms (OAuth2, API, JWT, etc.)
- Keep it concise but descriptive enough to understand the feature at a glance
- Examples:
- "I want to add user authentication" → "user-auth"
- "Implement OAuth2 integration for the API" → "oauth2-api-integration"
- "Create a dashboard for analytics" → "analytics-dashboard"
- "Fix payment processing timeout bug" → "fix-payment-timeout"
-
Create the feature branch by running the script with --short-name (and --json). In sequential mode, do NOT pass --number — the script auto-detects the next available number. In timestamp mode, the script generates a YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS prefix automatically:
Branch numbering mode: Before running the script, check if .specify/init-options.json exists and read the branch_numbering value.
-
If "timestamp", add --timestamp (Bash) or -Timestamp (PowerShell) to the script invocation
-
If "sequential" or absent, do not add any extra flag (default behavior)
-
Bash example: .specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh "$ARGUMENTS" --json --short-name "user-auth" "Add user authentication"
-
Bash (timestamp): .specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh "$ARGUMENTS" --json --timestamp --short-name "user-auth" "Add user authentication"
-
PowerShell example: .specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh "$ARGUMENTS" -Json -ShortName "user-auth" "Add user authentication"
-
PowerShell (timestamp): .specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh "$ARGUMENTS" -Json -Timestamp -ShortName "user-auth" "Add user authentication"
IMPORTANT:
- Do NOT pass
--number — the script determines the correct next number automatically
- Always include the JSON flag ( for Bash, for PowerShell) so the output can be parsed reliably
NOTE: The script creates and checks out the new branch and initializes the spec file before writing.
Quick Guidelines
- Focus on WHAT users need and WHY.
- Avoid HOW to implement (no tech stack, APIs, code structure).
- Written for business stakeholders, not developers.
- DO NOT create any checklists that are embedded in the spec. That will be a separate command.
Section Requirements
- Mandatory sections: Must be completed for every feature
- Optional sections: Include only when relevant to the feature
- When a section doesn't apply, remove it entirely (don't leave as "N/A")
For AI Generation
When creating this spec from a user prompt:
- Make informed guesses: Use context, industry standards, and common patterns to fill gaps
- Document assumptions: Record reasonable defaults in the Assumptions section
- Limit clarifications: Maximum 3 [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers - use only for critical decisions that:
- Significantly impact feature scope or user experience
- Have multiple reasonable interpretations with different implications
- Lack any reasonable default
- Prioritize clarifications: scope > security/privacy > user experience > technical details
- Think like a tester: Every vague requirement should fail the "testable and unambiguous" checklist item
- Common areas needing clarification (only if no reasonable default exists):
- Feature scope and boundaries (include/exclude specific use cases)
- User types and permissions (if multiple conflicting interpretations possible)
- Security/compliance requirements (when legally/financially significant)
Examples of reasonable defaults (don't ask about these):
- Data retention: Industry-standard practices for the domain
- Performance targets: Standard web/mobile app expectations unless specified
- Error handling: User-friendly messages with appropriate fallbacks
- Authentication method: Standard session-based or OAuth2 for web apps
- Integration patterns: Use project-appropriate patterns (REST/GraphQL for web services, function calls for libraries, CLI args for tools, etc.)
Success Criteria Guidelines
Success criteria must be:
- Measurable: Include specific metrics (time, percentage, count, rate)
- Technology-agnostic: No mention of frameworks, languages, databases, or tools
- User-focused: Describe outcomes from user/business perspective, not system internals
- Verifiable: Can be tested/validated without knowing implementation details
Good examples:
- "Users can complete checkout in under 3 minutes"
- "System supports 10,000 concurrent users"
- "95% of searches return results in under 1 second"
- "Task completion rate improves by 40%"
Bad examples (implementation-focused):
- "API response time is under 200ms" (too technical, use "Users see results instantly")
- "Database can handle 1000 TPS" (implementation detail, use user-facing metric)
- "React components render efficiently" (framework-specific)
- "Redis cache hit rate above 80%" (technology-specific)