用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/elsa-workflows/elsa-core --skill speckit-specify命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Draft, approve, and publish Elsa release announcements for Discord, LinkedIn, and X after an Elsa Core, Elsa Studio, Elsa Extensions, or similarly configured Elsa release has completed. Use when Codex needs to turn release notes, GitHub release URLs, package/feed availability, and build results into channel-specific community and social posts; supports direct Discord webhook posting and optional Buffer, Typefully, Zapier, Make, or manual publishing workflows for LinkedIn and X.
Refresh the Elsa roadmap from current evidence. Use when Codex needs to update ROADMAP.md or the public roadmap issue by researching elsa-core, elsa-studio, and elsa-extensions source code, specs, releases, commits, issues, pull requests, and discussions; classify shipped foundations, partial/productization work, roadmap candidates, stale items, and recommendations; then update the roadmap checklist and GitHub issue coherently.
Release Elsa repositories from GitHub tags. Use when Codex needs to create a preview or stable GitHub release for Elsa Core, Elsa Studio, Elsa Extensions, or any similarly configured Elsa repository where releases are driven by Git tags and GitHub release events; supports curated release notes, retagging an existing RC tag as a stable tag, publishing prereleases without NuGet, publishing stable releases that trigger NuGet, and sequencing downstream Elsa repository releases after packages are available.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | speckit-specify |
| description | Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description. |
| compatibility | Requires spec-kit project structure with .specify/ directory |
| metadata | {"author":"github-spec-kit","source":"templates/commands/specify.md"} |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
$ARGUMENTS
You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Check for extension hooks (before specification):
.specify/extensions.yml exists in the project root.hooks.before_specify keyenabled is explicitly false. Treat hooks without an enabled field as enabled by default.condition expressions:
condition field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executablecondition, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementationoptional flag:
optional: true):
## Extension Hooks
**Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
Command: `/{command}`
Description: {description}
Prompt: {prompt}
To execute: `/{command}`
optional: false):
## Extension Hooks
**Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
Executing: `/{command}`
EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
.specify/extensions.yml does not exist, skip silentlyThe text the user typed after /speckit.specify in the triggering message is the feature description. Assume you always have it available in this conversation even if $ARGUMENTS appears literally below. Do not ask the user to repeat it unless they provided an empty command.
Given that feature description, do this:
Generate a concise short name (2-4 words) for the branch:
Create the feature branch by running the script with --short-name (and --json). In sequential mode, do NOT pass --number — the script auto-detects the next available number. In timestamp mode, the script generates a YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS prefix automatically:
Branch numbering mode: Before running the script, check if .specify/init-options.json exists and read the branch_numbering value.
If "timestamp", add --timestamp (Bash) or -Timestamp (PowerShell) to the script invocation
If "sequential" or absent, do not add any extra flag (default behavior)
Bash example: .specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh "$ARGUMENTS" --json --short-name "user-auth" "Add user authentication"
Bash (timestamp): .specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh "$ARGUMENTS" --json --timestamp --short-name "user-auth" "Add user authentication"
PowerShell example: .specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh "$ARGUMENTS" -Json -ShortName "user-auth" "Add user authentication"
PowerShell (timestamp): .specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh "$ARGUMENTS" -Json -Timestamp -ShortName "user-auth" "Add user authentication"
IMPORTANT:
--number — the script determines the correct next number automaticallyNOTE: The script creates and checks out the new branch and initializes the spec file before writing.
When creating this spec from a user prompt:
Examples of reasonable defaults (don't ask about these):
Success criteria must be:
Good examples:
Bad examples (implementation-focused):
--json-JsonLoad .specify/templates/spec-template.md to understand required sections.
Follow this execution flow:
Write the specification to SPEC_FILE using the template structure, replacing placeholders with concrete details derived from the feature description (arguments) while preserving section order and headings.
Specification Quality Validation: After writing the initial spec, validate it against quality criteria:
a. Create Spec Quality Checklist: Generate a checklist file at FEATURE_DIR/checklists/requirements.md using the checklist template structure with these validation items:
# Specification Quality Checklist: [FEATURE NAME]
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: [DATE]
**Feature**: [Link to spec.md]
## Content Quality
- [ ] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [ ] Focused on user value and business needs
- [ ] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [ ] All mandatory sections completed
## Requirement Completeness
- [ ] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [ ] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [ ] Success criteria are measurable
- [ ] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [ ] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [ ] Edge cases are identified
- [ ] Scope is clearly bounded
- [ ] Dependencies and assumptions identified
## Feature Readiness
- [ ] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [ ] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [ ] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [ ] No implementation details leak into specification
## Notes
- Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`
b. Run Validation Check: Review the spec against each checklist item:
c. Handle Validation Results:
If all items pass: Mark checklist complete and proceed to step 7
If items fail (excluding [NEEDS CLARIFICATION]):
If [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain:
Extract all [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: ...] markers from the spec
LIMIT CHECK: If more than 3 markers exist, keep only the 3 most critical (by scope/security/UX impact) and make informed guesses for the rest
For each clarification needed (max 3), present options to user in this format:
## Question [N]: [Topic]
**Context**: [Quote relevant spec section]
**What we need to know**: [Specific question from NEEDS CLARIFICATION marker]
**Suggested Answers**:
| Option | Answer | Implications |
|--------|--------|--------------|
| A | [First suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
| B | [Second suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
| C | [Third suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
| Custom | Provide your own answer | [Explain how to provide custom input] |
**Your choice**: _[Wait for user response]_
CRITICAL - Table Formatting: Ensure markdown tables are properly formatted:
| Content | not |Content||--------|Number questions sequentially (Q1, Q2, Q3 - max 3 total)
Present all questions together before waiting for responses
Wait for user to respond with their choices for all questions (e.g., "Q1: A, Q2: Custom - [details], Q3: B")
Update the spec by replacing each [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] marker with the user's selected or provided answer
d. Update Checklist: After each validation iteration, update the checklist file with current pass/fail status
Report completion with branch name, spec file path, checklist results, and readiness for the next phase (/speckit.clarify or /speckit.plan).
Check for extension hooks: After reporting completion, check if .specify/extensions.yml exists in the project root.
hooks.after_specify keyenabled is explicitly false. Treat hooks without an enabled field as enabled by default.condition expressions:
condition field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executablecondition, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementationoptional flag:
optional: true):
## Extension Hooks
**Optional Hook**: {extension}
Command: `/{command}`
Description: {description}
Prompt: {prompt}
To execute: `/{command}`
optional: false):
## Extension Hooks
**Automatic Hook**: {extension}
Executing: `/{command}`
EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
.specify/extensions.yml does not exist, skip silentlyRe-run validation after all clarifications are resolved