Skip to main content

harden

Deliberately upgrade the project's feedback harness. Use when adding a verify command, setting up CI, introducing lint/format, or making the dev loop self-enforcing. Covers canonical verify scripts, lint/format, CI configuration, and dev-loop documentation.

الانتقال إلى التثبيت

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
hashintel/labs
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٢٣ مارس ٢٠٢٦ في ١٢:١٢
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
٣٦
التفرعات
١٤

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
harden
description
Deliberately upgrade the project's feedback harness. Use when adding a verify command, setting up CI, introducing lint/format, or making the dev loop self-enforcing. Covers canonical verify scripts, lint/format, CI configuration, and dev-loop documentation.
argument-hint
[what to harden, e.g. 'add verify command', 'add CI', 'add formatting']
# Harden Deliberately upgrade the project's **feedback harness** — the commands, gates, and automation that make verification self-enforcing. Introduce lint, formatting, CI, and a canonical verify command **intentionally and incrementally**. This resolves the tension between `/pragma:skeleton` ("no lint/format yet") and `/pragma:slice` ("run the verification harness"). ## Input What to harden: $ARGUMENTS **Preconditions**: - A walking skeleton must exist. If none → `/pragma:skeleton` first. - Ideally 1-2 real slices have landed (you want to know what checks actually matter before formalizing). ## Procedure ### 1. Audit the current harness What commands exist? Are they consistent? Is there a single "everything is green" command? Is there CI? Does CI match local? ### 2. Define the target verify command One canonical command to trust: ``` bun run verify # or: npm run verify, make verify, etc. ``` Runs in order: typecheck → lint → format check → unit tests → integration tests → build. - Must be fast enough for pre-commit (target: < 60s) - If some checks are slow, split: `verify` (fast) and `verify:full` (CI-only) ### 3. Introduce ONE tool Pick **one** improvement per `/pragma:harden` invocation: - **Formatting**: choose one formatter, configure minimally (defaults first), run on whole codebase, add to verify - **Lint**: choose one linter, default ruleset, fix existing violations, add to verify - **CI**: create config running the verify command, fail on verify failure - **Pre-commit hook** (optional): must be fast (< 10s) or it will be bypassed ### 4. Document the dev loop Create or update a short section (README or `docs/dev-loop.md`): 1. How to verify (canonical command) 2. What it checks (ordered list) 3. How to run subsets 4. CI: where it runs, what triggers it ### 5. Verify and commit Run the new verify command. If the new tool creates violations, fix them in this commit. Commit: `Harden: add [tool/command] to verification harness` ## Constraints - **One tool at a time.** Do not batch formatting + lint + CI in one invocation. - **Local and CI must agree.** No "CI-only" checks developers can't run locally. - **Fast by default.** Slow checks go in `verify:full`. - **No speculative rules.** Add rules that catch real problems you've seen. - **Minimal configuration.** Defaults first. Customize only when a default causes real pain. - **Don't block feature work.** Too much friction → back it out and try again later. ## Output 1. **Tool added**: what was introduced and why 2. **Verify command**: current canonical command and what it runs 3. **Violations fixed**: what existing code needed cleanup 4. **Dev loop doc**: where the documentation lives 5. **Recommended next harden step**: what to add next (if anything) 6. **Lifecycle**: `State: governance`, `Next: /pragma:consult`, `Loop: /pragma:consult` (default unless user explicitly continues directly)
عرض على GitHub