Skip to main content

harden

Deliberately upgrade the project's feedback harness. Use when adding a verify command, setting up CI, introducing lint/format, or making the dev loop self-enforcing. Covers canonical verify scripts, lint/format, CI configuration, and dev-loop documentation.

跳到安装

来源信息

仓库
hashintel/labs
最近来源活动
2026年3月23日 12:12
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
36
分支
14

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
name
harden
description
Deliberately upgrade the project's feedback harness. Use when adding a verify command, setting up CI, introducing lint/format, or making the dev loop self-enforcing. Covers canonical verify scripts, lint/format, CI configuration, and dev-loop documentation.
argument-hint
[what to harden, e.g. 'add verify command', 'add CI', 'add formatting']
# Harden Deliberately upgrade the project's **feedback harness** — the commands, gates, and automation that make verification self-enforcing. Introduce lint, formatting, CI, and a canonical verify command **intentionally and incrementally**. This resolves the tension between `/pragma:skeleton` ("no lint/format yet") and `/pragma:slice` ("run the verification harness"). ## Input What to harden: $ARGUMENTS **Preconditions**: - A walking skeleton must exist. If none → `/pragma:skeleton` first. - Ideally 1-2 real slices have landed (you want to know what checks actually matter before formalizing). ## Procedure ### 1. Audit the current harness What commands exist? Are they consistent? Is there a single "everything is green" command? Is there CI? Does CI match local? ### 2. Define the target verify command One canonical command to trust: ``` bun run verify # or: npm run verify, make verify, etc. ``` Runs in order: typecheck → lint → format check → unit tests → integration tests → build. - Must be fast enough for pre-commit (target: < 60s) - If some checks are slow, split: `verify` (fast) and `verify:full` (CI-only) ### 3. Introduce ONE tool Pick **one** improvement per `/pragma:harden` invocation: - **Formatting**: choose one formatter, configure minimally (defaults first), run on whole codebase, add to verify - **Lint**: choose one linter, default ruleset, fix existing violations, add to verify - **CI**: create config running the verify command, fail on verify failure - **Pre-commit hook** (optional): must be fast (< 10s) or it will be bypassed ### 4. Document the dev loop Create or update a short section (README or `docs/dev-loop.md`): 1. How to verify (canonical command) 2. What it checks (ordered list) 3. How to run subsets 4. CI: where it runs, what triggers it ### 5. Verify and commit Run the new verify command. If the new tool creates violations, fix them in this commit. Commit: `Harden: add [tool/command] to verification harness` ## Constraints - **One tool at a time.** Do not batch formatting + lint + CI in one invocation. - **Local and CI must agree.** No "CI-only" checks developers can't run locally. - **Fast by default.** Slow checks go in `verify:full`. - **No speculative rules.** Add rules that catch real problems you've seen. - **Minimal configuration.** Defaults first. Customize only when a default causes real pain. - **Don't block feature work.** Too much friction → back it out and try again later. ## Output 1. **Tool added**: what was introduced and why 2. **Verify command**: current canonical command and what it runs 3. **Violations fixed**: what existing code needed cleanup 4. **Dev loop doc**: where the documentation lives 5. **Recommended next harden step**: what to add next (if anything) 6. **Lifecycle**: `State: governance`, `Next: /pragma:consult`, `Loop: /pragma:consult` (default unless user explicitly continues directly)
在 GitHub 查看