Skip to main content

task-driven-codesign-multirobot

Task-Driven Co-Design (TDCD) methodology for heterogeneous multi-robot systems. Bi-level combinatorial optimization combining MILP and MCTS for robot design, fleet composition, and planning. Use for multi-agent robotics, automated logistics, co-design problems, and hybrid optimization.

الانتقال إلى التثبيت

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
hiyenwong/ai_collection
آخر نشاط في المصدر
٤ يونيو ٢٠٢٦ في ١٣:٣٢
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
٢
التفرعات
٠

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
task-driven-codesign-multirobot
description
Task-Driven Co-Design (TDCD) methodology for heterogeneous multi-robot systems. Bi-level combinatorial optimization combining MILP and MCTS for robot design, fleet composition, and planning. Use for multi-agent robotics, automated logistics, co-design problems, and hybrid optimization.
# Task-Driven Co-Design of Heterogeneous Multi-Robot Systems This skill provides methodology for Task-Driven Co-Design (TDCD) of heterogeneous multi-robot systems, based on the paper "Task-Driven Co-Design of Heterogeneous Multi-Robot Systems" (arXiv:2604.21894). ## Overview TDCD formulates multi-robot system design as a **bi-level combinatorial optimization problem**: - **Outer-loop**: Selects fleet composition (discrete decisions) - **Inner-loop**: Searches robot designs and computes coordinated multi-agent plans (continuous + discrete decisions) ## Methodology The framework synergistically couples **Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP)** and **Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS)**: ### MILP Component - Handles continuous robot design variables - Optimizes trajectory planning - Manages operational constraints ### MCTS Component - Explores discrete decision space of fleet composition - Handles combinatorial explosion of robot type/quantity combinations - Provides anytime algorithm with convergence guarantees ## Key Contributions 1. **10× speedup** compared to pure MILP baseline 2. **30% higher success rate** compared to pure MCTS 3. Validated on warehouse logistics with ground + aerial robots ## Problem Formulation ### Variables - **Fleet composition**: Number and types of robots - **Robot designs**: Physical parameters (size, battery, sensors) - **Multi-agent plans**: Coordinated trajectories and task assignments ### Constraints - Task requirements (pick-and-place operations) - Physical feasibility (collision avoidance, battery life) - Resource limitations (budget, space) ## Implementation Guide ### Step 1: Define Task Requirements ```python task_requirements = { "operations": [...], # List of pick-and-place tasks "environment": {...}, # Warehouse layout, obstacles "constraints": {...} # Time windows, resource limits } ``` ### Step 2: Initialize MCTS ```python from mcts import MCTSNode, UCB1 # Root node: empty fleet root = MCTSNode(fleet_composition={}) # UCB1 for exploration/exploitation ucb_score = Q + C * sqrt(log(N_parent) / N) ``` ### Step 3: MILP Sub-problem ```python from pulp import LpProblem, LpVariable, lpSum # For each candidate fleet composition from MCTS milp = LpProblem(f"RobotDesign_{fleet_id}", LpMinimize) # Variables: robot parameters, trajectories robot_params = LpVariable.dicts("params", [...], lowBound=0) trajectories = LpVariable.dicts("traj", [...], cat='Binary') # Objective: minimize total cost / maximize throughput milp += lpSum([costs[r] * robot_params[r] for r in robots]) # Solve MILP for this fleet composition solution = milp.solve() ``` ### Step 4: Backpropagation ```python def backpropagate(node, reward): while node: node.visits += 1 node.value += reward node = node.parent ``` ## Workflow ``` 1. Input: Task requirements, robot specifications 2. Initialize MCTS with empty fleet 3. While computational budget remains: a. Select: UCB1 to choose promising fleet composition b. Expand: Add new robot types/quantities c. Simulate: Solve MILP for trajectory and design d. Backpropagate: Update MCTS statistics 4. Return: Best (fleet, design, plan) triple ``` ## Advantages | Aspect | Pure MILP | Pure MCTS | TDCD (MILP+MCTS) | |--------|-----------|-----------|------------------| | Continuous optimization | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ (MILP) | | Combinatorial handling | ✗ (slow) | ✓ | ✓ (MCTS) | | Scalability | Limited | Moderate | High | | Solution quality | Optimal (if solves) | Approximate | High-quality | | Speed | Slow | Moderate | Fast (10×) | ## Applications - **Warehouse logistics**: Ground + aerial robots for inventory management - **Search and rescue**: Heterogeneous teams (drones + ground vehicles) - **Manufacturing**: Collaborative robots with different capabilities - **Agriculture**: Multi-modal farming robots ## Trigger Keywords - "multi-robot co-design" - "fleet composition optimization" - "task-driven design" - "heterogeneous robot systems" - "MILP MCTS hybrid optimization" - "warehouse automation design" - "robot fleet planning" ## References - Stralz, M., Alharbi, M., Huang, Y., et al. (2026). "Task-Driven Co-Design of Heterogeneous Multi-Robot Systems." arXiv:2604.21894. - Silver, D., et al. (2016). "Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search." Nature. - Bertsimas, D., & Tsitsiklis, J. (1997). "Introduction to Linear Optimization." ## Tools Used - **Python**: `pulp` (MILP), `numpy`, `anytree` (MCTS) - **ROS**: For robot simulation - **Gazebo**: Physics simulation for validation ## Example Use Case ``` User: "I need to design a warehouse automation system with 1000 pick-and-place operations per hour. Should I use ground robots, drones, or a mix?" Agent: Using TDCD framework, I can: 1. Formulate as bi-level optimization 2. Explore fleet compositions with MCTS 3. Optimize designs and trajectories with MILP 4. Compare pure ground, pure aerial, and mixed solutions Result: Mixed fleet of 15 ground robots + 8 drones provides optimal throughput at minimum cost. ```
عرض على GitHub