Skip to main content

task-driven-codesign-multirobot

Task-Driven Co-Design (TDCD) methodology for heterogeneous multi-robot systems. Bi-level combinatorial optimization combining MILP and MCTS for robot design, fleet composition, and planning. Use for multi-agent robotics, automated logistics, co-design problems, and hybrid optimization.

インストールへ移動

ソース情報

リポジトリ
hiyenwong/ai_collection
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年6月4日 13:32
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
2
フォーク
0

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
task-driven-codesign-multirobot
description
Task-Driven Co-Design (TDCD) methodology for heterogeneous multi-robot systems. Bi-level combinatorial optimization combining MILP and MCTS for robot design, fleet composition, and planning. Use for multi-agent robotics, automated logistics, co-design problems, and hybrid optimization.
# Task-Driven Co-Design of Heterogeneous Multi-Robot Systems This skill provides methodology for Task-Driven Co-Design (TDCD) of heterogeneous multi-robot systems, based on the paper "Task-Driven Co-Design of Heterogeneous Multi-Robot Systems" (arXiv:2604.21894). ## Overview TDCD formulates multi-robot system design as a **bi-level combinatorial optimization problem**: - **Outer-loop**: Selects fleet composition (discrete decisions) - **Inner-loop**: Searches robot designs and computes coordinated multi-agent plans (continuous + discrete decisions) ## Methodology The framework synergistically couples **Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP)** and **Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS)**: ### MILP Component - Handles continuous robot design variables - Optimizes trajectory planning - Manages operational constraints ### MCTS Component - Explores discrete decision space of fleet composition - Handles combinatorial explosion of robot type/quantity combinations - Provides anytime algorithm with convergence guarantees ## Key Contributions 1. **10× speedup** compared to pure MILP baseline 2. **30% higher success rate** compared to pure MCTS 3. Validated on warehouse logistics with ground + aerial robots ## Problem Formulation ### Variables - **Fleet composition**: Number and types of robots - **Robot designs**: Physical parameters (size, battery, sensors) - **Multi-agent plans**: Coordinated trajectories and task assignments ### Constraints - Task requirements (pick-and-place operations) - Physical feasibility (collision avoidance, battery life) - Resource limitations (budget, space) ## Implementation Guide ### Step 1: Define Task Requirements ```python task_requirements = { "operations": [...], # List of pick-and-place tasks "environment": {...}, # Warehouse layout, obstacles "constraints": {...} # Time windows, resource limits } ``` ### Step 2: Initialize MCTS ```python from mcts import MCTSNode, UCB1 # Root node: empty fleet root = MCTSNode(fleet_composition={}) # UCB1 for exploration/exploitation ucb_score = Q + C * sqrt(log(N_parent) / N) ``` ### Step 3: MILP Sub-problem ```python from pulp import LpProblem, LpVariable, lpSum # For each candidate fleet composition from MCTS milp = LpProblem(f"RobotDesign_{fleet_id}", LpMinimize) # Variables: robot parameters, trajectories robot_params = LpVariable.dicts("params", [...], lowBound=0) trajectories = LpVariable.dicts("traj", [...], cat='Binary') # Objective: minimize total cost / maximize throughput milp += lpSum([costs[r] * robot_params[r] for r in robots]) # Solve MILP for this fleet composition solution = milp.solve() ``` ### Step 4: Backpropagation ```python def backpropagate(node, reward): while node: node.visits += 1 node.value += reward node = node.parent ``` ## Workflow ``` 1. Input: Task requirements, robot specifications 2. Initialize MCTS with empty fleet 3. While computational budget remains: a. Select: UCB1 to choose promising fleet composition b. Expand: Add new robot types/quantities c. Simulate: Solve MILP for trajectory and design d. Backpropagate: Update MCTS statistics 4. Return: Best (fleet, design, plan) triple ``` ## Advantages | Aspect | Pure MILP | Pure MCTS | TDCD (MILP+MCTS) | |--------|-----------|-----------|------------------| | Continuous optimization | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ (MILP) | | Combinatorial handling | ✗ (slow) | ✓ | ✓ (MCTS) | | Scalability | Limited | Moderate | High | | Solution quality | Optimal (if solves) | Approximate | High-quality | | Speed | Slow | Moderate | Fast (10×) | ## Applications - **Warehouse logistics**: Ground + aerial robots for inventory management - **Search and rescue**: Heterogeneous teams (drones + ground vehicles) - **Manufacturing**: Collaborative robots with different capabilities - **Agriculture**: Multi-modal farming robots ## Trigger Keywords - "multi-robot co-design" - "fleet composition optimization" - "task-driven design" - "heterogeneous robot systems" - "MILP MCTS hybrid optimization" - "warehouse automation design" - "robot fleet planning" ## References - Stralz, M., Alharbi, M., Huang, Y., et al. (2026). "Task-Driven Co-Design of Heterogeneous Multi-Robot Systems." arXiv:2604.21894. - Silver, D., et al. (2016). "Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search." Nature. - Bertsimas, D., & Tsitsiklis, J. (1997). "Introduction to Linear Optimization." ## Tools Used - **Python**: `pulp` (MILP), `numpy`, `anytree` (MCTS) - **ROS**: For robot simulation - **Gazebo**: Physics simulation for validation ## Example Use Case ``` User: "I need to design a warehouse automation system with 1000 pick-and-place operations per hour. Should I use ground robots, drones, or a mix?" Agent: Using TDCD framework, I can: 1. Formulate as bi-level optimization 2. Explore fleet compositions with MCTS 3. Optimize designs and trajectories with MILP 4. Compare pure ground, pure aerial, and mixed solutions Result: Mixed fleet of 15 ground robots + 8 drones provides optimal throughput at minimum cost. ```
GitHubで見る