| name | git-toolkit |
| description | Git workflows for commit planning, branch cleanup, fixup/autosquash, conflicts, bisect, single-reviewer diff review, and multi-commit stacks. Use for local history or change splitting, repair, review, and validation. Use interrogate for multi-model review. |
Git Toolkit
Route Git work to one mode and load only its reference.
How I choose what to do (progressive disclosure)
When invoked, route to one mode:
- commit-discipline: plan atomic commits, draft messages, or choose
amend/fixup/autosquash. Read
commit-discipline.md.
- hunk-history: split, move, restore, amend, or squash selected hunks with
git-surgeon. Read git-surgeon.md.
- regression-bisect: locate a first bad commit. Read
bisect.md.
- change-stack: shape or review multi-commit branches and PR stacks. Read
change-stack.md.
- adversarial-review: independently review a commit, PR, or diff against
falsifiable design premises and repository-wide constraints. Read
adversarial-review.md.
- routine-workflow: branch creation, naming, cleanup, merge/rebase choice,
conflict resolution, or standard Git operations. Git mechanics are
model-known; read operating-rules.md when
naming a branch or when shared-history risk or GitHub boundaries matter.
- github-toolkit: issues, pull requests, review feedback, and CI state.
Invoke
$github-toolkit; do not depend on a sibling filesystem path.
If intent is unclear, ask for the mode before applying changes.
Read scripts.md when deterministic stack collection or
an isolated automated bisect can replace manual Git command assembly.
MIT attribution for git-surgeon:
LICENSE-git-surgeon.
Repository contributor docs and existing history remain authoritative. This
skill supplies workflow defaults where repository canon is silent.
