| name | sales-forecaster |
| description | Satış tahmini. Pipeline analysis, weighted forecast, scenario planning ve trend adjustment. |
| triggers | {"keywords":["sales forecast","satış tahmini","pipeline analysis","revenue forecasting","quota attainment"]} |
| auto_load_when | Kullanıcı satış tahmini, pipeline analizi, weighted forecast veya revenue planning talep ettiğinde |
| agent | researcher |
| tools | ["Read","Write","Grep","Glob"] |
Sales Forecaster (Satış Tahmin Uzmanı)
Odak Alanı: Satış pipeline analizi yapmak, weighted forecasting uygulamak, senaryo planlaması oluşturmak ve trendleri değerlendirmek.
Pattern 1: Pipeline Analysis Framework
1.1 Pipeline Metrics
Pipeline Health Metrics:
├── Pipeline Coverage
│ ├── Formula: Pipeline Value / Quota
│ ├── Healthy range: 3-4x quota
│ ├── Warning signs: <3x coverage
│ └── Action: Ramp pipeline or adjust quota
│
├── Pipeline Velocity
│ ├── Time in stage analysis
│ ├── Average cycle time
│ ├── Stage conversion rates
│ └── Bottleneck identification
│
├── Pipeline Quality
│ ├── Qualified vs unqualified
│ ├── Weighted value vs nominal
│ ├── Recent vs stale deals
│ └── Champion presence
│
└── Deal Distribution
├── Deal size distribution
├── Stage distribution
├── Rep performance variance
└── Seasonal patterns
1.2 Pipeline Analysis Tree
Pipeline Health Assessment:
├── Stage-by-Stage Analysis
│ ├── Stage 1: Lead to Qualification
│ │ ├── Conversion rate: target >40%
│ │ ├── Avg time: <7 days
│ │ └── Quality: Clear criteria met
│ │
│ ├── Stage 2: Qualification to Proposal
│ │ ├── Conversion rate: target >60%
│ │ ├── Avg time: <14 days
│ │ └── Quality: Budget confirmed
│ │
│ ├── Stage 3: Proposal to Negotiation
│ │ ├── Conversion rate: target >50%
│ │ ├── Avg time: <21 days
│ │ └── Quality: Proposal sent
│ │
│ └── Stage 4: Negotiation to Close
│ ├── Conversion rate: target >70%
│ ├── Avg time: <14 days
│ └── Quality: Verbal commitment
│
├── Risk Assessment
│ ├── Stale deals (>30 days no activity)
│ ├── Large deals without champion
│ ├── Deals stuck in same stage
│ └── Competitor involvement
│
└── Opportunity Scoring
├── Deal score calculation
├── Weighted pipeline value
└── Forecast confidence
1.3 Pipeline Categorization
Deal Categorization:
├── Strong (90-100% close probability)
│ ├── Verbal commitment received
│ ├── Contract drafted
│ ├── Budget approved
│ └── No major obstacles
│
├── Likely (60-89% close probability)
│ ├── Clear need identified
│ ├── Decision maker engaged
│ ├── Budget allocated
│ └── Timeline confirmed
│
├── Possible (30-59% close probability)
│ ├── Interest demonstrated
│ ├── Multiple stakeholders
│ ├── Budget potential
│ └── Timeline potential
│
└── Weak (<30% close probability)
├── Early stage
├── No decision maker
├── No budget identified
└── Timeline unclear
Pattern 2: Weighted Forecast Model
2.1 Weighted Pipeline Calculation
Weighted Pipeline Formula:
Weighted Value = Σ (Deal Value × Probability)
Example Calculation:
├── Deal A: $50,000 × 90% = $45,000
├── Deal B: $30,000 × 60% = $18,000
├── Deal C: $80,000 × 40% = $32,000
├── Deal D: $25,000 × 20% = $5,000
├── Deal E: $100,000 × 10% = $10,000
│
└── Total Weighted: $110,000
2.2 Stage-Based Probability
Standard Probability by Stage:
├── Prospecting (New): 10%
├── Qualification: 20%
├── Needs Analysis: 30%
├── Proposal: 50%
├── Negotiation: 75%
├── Closed Won: 100%
└── Closed Lost: 0%
Custom Probability Adjustments:
├── High Confidence Deals (+10-20%)
│ ├── Champion in place
│ ├── Budget approved
│ └── Competitive win likely
│
├── Low Confidence Deals (-10-20%)
│ ├── No champion
│ ├── Budget uncertain
│ └── Competitor favorite
│
└── Stale Deals (reduce by stage)
├── 30+ days no activity: -10%
├── 60+ days no activity: -20%
└── 90+ days no activity: -30%
2.3 Confidence Levels
Forecast Confidence Scoring:
├── High Confidence (Score 8-10)
│ ├── >80% weighted probability
│ ├── Decision maker engaged
│ ├── Timeline confirmed
│ └── Budget approved
│
├── Medium Confidence (Score 5-7)
│ ├── 50-80% weighted probability
│ ├── Multiple stakeholders engaged
│ ├── Budget likely
│ └── Timeline reasonable
│
└── Low Confidence (Score 1-4)
├── <50% weighted probability
├── Early in process
├── No budget confirmed
└── Timeline unclear
Pattern 3: Scenario Planning
3.1 Scenario Tree
Forecast Scenarios:
├── Best Case Scenario
│ ├── All "Strong" deals close
│ ├── 80% of "Likely" deals close
│ ├── 50% of "Possible" deals close
│ └── Weather: Strong pipeline, good economy
│
├── Expected Case Scenario
│ ├── All "Strong" deals close
│ ├── 60% of "Likely" deals close
│ ├── 30% of "Possible" deals close
│ └── Weather: Normal pipeline, stable economy
│
├── Conservative Case Scenario
│ ├── All "Strong" deals close
│ ├── 40% of "Likely" deals close
│ ├── 10% of "Possible" deals close
│ └── Weather: Pipeline challenges, uncertain economy
│
└── Worst Case Scenario
├── 80% of "Strong" deals close
├── 20% of "Likely" deals close
└── No "Possible" deals close
3.2 Scenario Selection Framework
Choosing Scenario:
├── Based on Historical Accuracy
│ ├── Track actual vs forecast
│ ├── Calculate variance by scenario
│ ├── Adjust based on accuracy
│ └── Document patterns
│
├── Based on Current Pipeline
│ ├── Pipeline coverage ratio
│ ├── Weighted pipeline vs quota
│ ├── Deal quality assessment
│ └── Risk factors
│
├── Based on Market Conditions
│ ├── Economic outlook
│ ├── Industry trends
│ ├── Competitive landscape
│ └── Seasonal factors
│
└── Based on Rep Performance
├── Individual track record
├── Forecast accuracy by rep
├── Historical conversion rates
└── Pipeline quality by rep
Pattern 4: Trend Adjustment
4.1 Trend Analysis
Trend Indicators:
├── Year-over-Year (YoY)
│ ├── Compare to same period last year
│ ├── Adjust for seasonality
│ └── Calculate growth rate
│
├── Month-over-Month (MoM)
│ ├── Track month-to-month changes
│ ├── Identify patterns
│ └── Adjust for anomalies
│
├── Quarter-over-Quarter (QoQ)
│ ├── Quarterly performance
│ ├── Quarter-end patterns
│ └── Quarter projection
│
└── Rolling Average
├── 3-month rolling average
├── 6-month rolling average
├── 12-month rolling average
└── Trend direction
4.2 Adjustment Factors
Seasonal Adjustments:
├── Q1 Adjustments
│ ├── January: Slow (post-holiday)
│ ├── February: Building
│ ├── March: Strong (quarter-end)
│
├── Q2 Adjustments
│ ├── April: Moderate
│ ├── May: Building
│ ├── June: Strong (quarter-end)
│
├── Q3 Adjustments
│ ├── July: Slow (summer)
│ ├── August: Building
│ ├── September: Strong (quarter-end)
│
└── Q4 Adjustments
├── October: Strong
├── November: Very strong
└── December: Last push
Trend Adjustment Formula:
Adjusted Forecast = Base Forecast × (1 + Trend Factor) × (1 + Seasonality)
4.3 Anomaly Detection
Anomaly Types:
├── Positive Anomalies
│ ├── Unexpected large deals
│ ├── Unusual win rate spike
│ ├── Accelerated timeline
│ └── Competitor displacement
│
├── Negative Anomalies
│ ├── Unexpected losses
│ ├── Extended sales cycles
│ ├── Budget freezes
│ └── Competitor wins
│
└── Handling Anomalies
├── Identify root cause
├── Decide to include/exclude
├── Document in forecast
└── Adjust confidence level
Pattern 5: Forecast Reporting
5.1 Dashboard Metrics
Forecast Dashboard:
├── Pipeline Metrics
│ ├── Total pipeline value
│ ├── Weighted pipeline value
│ ├── Pipeline coverage
│ └── Pipeline velocity
│
├── Forecast Metrics
│ ├── Best case
│ ├── Expected case
│ ├── Conservative case
│ ├── Commit (guaranteed)
│ └── Best estimate
│
├── Performance Metrics
│ ├── Quota attainment
│ ├── Attainment vs forecast
│ ├── Win rate
│ └── Average deal size
│
└── Risk Metrics
├── At-risk deals
├── Stale deals
├── Deal slippage
└── Conversion by stage
5.2 Forecasting Best Practices
Forecast Cadence:
├── Weekly
│ ├── Rep-level deal review
│ ├── Pipeline health check
│ └── Updated probabilities
│
├── Monthly
│ ├── Forecast review meeting
│ ├── Trend analysis
│ └── Adjustments
│
├── Quarterly
│ ├── Full forecast refresh
│ ├── Scenario planning
│ ├── Quota setting input
│ └── Executive review
│
└── Annual
├── Strategic planning
├── Market-based adjustments
└── Multi-year projections
Key Patterns (Özet)
| Pattern | Odak | Uygulama |
|---|
| Pipeline Analysis | Health metrics | Coverage, velocity, quality |
| Weighted Forecast | Probability | Deal scoring, stage weights |
| Senaryo Planlama | Best/expected/conservative | Multiple outcomes |
| Trend Adjustment | Time-based | YoY, MoQ, seasonality |
| Raporlama | Dashboard | Weekly + monthly + quarterly |
Anti-Patterns
❌ Yasaklı Yaklaşımlar
Forecast errors:
- Pipeline-only forecasting
- No confidence levels
- Ignoring historical accuracy
- No scenario planning
Process errors:
- Infrequent updates
- No rep accountability
- Disconnected from reality
- Not adjusting for anomalies
✅ Doğru Yaklaşımlar
Best practices:
- Weighted pipeline methodology
- Multiple scenarios
- Confidence levels
- Regular updates
Validation:
- Track actual vs forecast
- Analyze variance
- Adjust methodology
- Document assumptions
Quick Reference
| Stage | Probability | Weighted |
|---|
| Prospecting | 10% | Deal × 0.10 |
| Qualification | 20% | Deal × 0.20 |
| Proposal | 50% | Deal × 0.50 |
| Negotiation | 75% | Deal × 0.75 |
| Closed Won | 100% | Full value |
| Metric | Target | Warning |
|---|
| Pipeline coverage | 3-4x quota | <3x |
| Win rate | >30% | <20% |
| Forecast accuracy | >85% | <70% |
| Avg sales cycle | Industry avg | >20% vs avg |
| Scenario | Use When | Adjustment |
|---|
| Best case | Strong pipeline | +20-30% |
| Expected | Normal | Base |
| Conservative | Weak pipeline | -20-30% |
| Worst case | Crisis | -40%+ |
| Frequency | Task | Owner |
|---|
| Weekly | Deal review | Rep/Manager |
| Monthly | Forecast review | Sales Lead |
| Quarterly | Full refresh | Sales Ops |
| Annual | Strategic | VP Sales |
🌍 Universal Language Support
- Turkish Native: This skill natively supports Turkish. If the user prompt is in Turkish, all analysis, formatting, and output MUST be entirely in Turkish. You do not need explicit "write in Turkish" instructions.