用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/mikailustuner/OmniRule --skill sales-forecaster命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | sales-forecaster |
| description | Satış tahmini. Pipeline analysis, weighted forecast, scenario planning ve trend adjustment. |
| triggers | {"keywords":["sales forecast","satış tahmini","pipeline analysis","revenue forecasting","quota attainment"]} |
| auto_load_when | Kullanıcı satış tahmini, pipeline analizi, weighted forecast veya revenue planning talep ettiğinde |
| agent | researcher |
| tools | ["Read","Write","Grep","Glob"] |
Odak Alanı: Satış pipeline analizi yapmak, weighted forecasting uygulamak, senaryo planlaması oluşturmak ve trendleri değerlendirmek.
Pipeline Health Metrics:
├── Pipeline Coverage
│ ├── Formula: Pipeline Value / Quota
│ ├── Healthy range: 3-4x quota
│ ├── Warning signs: <3x coverage
│ └── Action: Ramp pipeline or adjust quota
│
├── Pipeline Velocity
│ ├── Time in stage analysis
│ ├── Average cycle time
│ ├── Stage conversion rates
│ └── Bottleneck identification
│
├── Pipeline Quality
│ ├── Qualified vs unqualified
│ ├── Weighted value vs nominal
│ ├── Recent vs stale deals
│ └── Champion presence
│
└── Deal Distribution
├── Deal size distribution
├── Stage distribution
├── Rep performance variance
└── Seasonal patterns
Pipeline Health Assessment:
├── Stage-by-Stage Analysis
│ ├── Stage 1: Lead to Qualification
│ │ ├── Conversion rate: target >40%
│ │ ├── Avg time: <7 days
│ │ └── Quality: Clear criteria met
│ │
│ ├── Stage 2: Qualification to Proposal
│ │ ├── Conversion rate: target >60%
│ │ ├── Avg time: <14 days
│ │ └── Quality: Budget confirmed
│ │
│ ├── Stage 3: Proposal to Negotiation
│ │ ├── Conversion rate: target >50%
│ │ ├── Avg time: <21 days
│ │ └── Quality: Proposal sent
│ │
│ └── Stage 4: Negotiation to Close
│ ├── Conversion rate: target >70%
│ ├── Avg time: <14 days
│ └── Quality: Verbal commitment
│
├── Risk Assessment
│ ├── Stale deals (>30 days no activity)
│ ├── Large deals without champion
│ ├── Deals stuck in same stage
│ └── Competitor involvement
│
└── Opportunity Scoring
├── Deal score calculation
├── Weighted pipeline value
└── Forecast confidence
Deal Categorization:
├── Strong (90-100% close probability)
│ ├── Verbal commitment received
│ ├── Contract drafted
│ ├── Budget approved
│ └── No major obstacles
│
├── Likely (60-89% close probability)
│ ├── Clear need identified
│ ├── Decision maker engaged
│ ├── Budget allocated
│ └── Timeline confirmed
│
├── Possible (30-59% close probability)
│ ├── Interest demonstrated
│ ├── Multiple stakeholders
│ ├── Budget potential
│ └── Timeline potential
│
└── Weak (<30% close probability)
├── Early stage
├── No decision maker
├── No budget identified
└── Timeline unclear
Weighted Pipeline Formula:
Weighted Value = Σ (Deal Value × Probability)
Example Calculation:
├── Deal A: $50,000 × 90% = $45,000
├── Deal B: $30,000 × 60% = $18,000
├── Deal C: $80,000 × 40% = $32,000
├── Deal D: $25,000 × 20% = $5,000
├── Deal E: $100,000 × 10% = $10,000
│
└── Total Weighted: $110,000
Standard Probability by Stage:
├── Prospecting (New): 10%
├── Qualification: 20%
├── Needs Analysis: 30%
├── Proposal: 50%
├── Negotiation: 75%
├── Closed Won: 100%
└── Closed Lost: 0%
Custom Probability Adjustments:
├── High Confidence Deals (+10-20%)
│ ├── Champion in place
│ ├── Budget approved
│ └── Competitive win likely
│
├── Low Confidence Deals (-10-20%)
│ ├── No champion
│ ├── Budget uncertain
│ └── Competitor favorite
│
└── Stale Deals (reduce by stage)
├── 30+ days no activity: -10%
├── 60+ days no activity: -20%
└── 90+ days no activity: -30%
Forecast Confidence Scoring:
├── High Confidence (Score 8-10)
│ ├── >80% weighted probability
│ ├── Decision maker engaged
│ ├── Timeline confirmed
│ └── Budget approved
│
├── Medium Confidence (Score 5-7)
│ ├── 50-80% weighted probability
│ ├── Multiple stakeholders engaged
│ ├── Budget likely
│ └── Timeline reasonable
│
└── Low Confidence (Score 1-4)
├── <50% weighted probability
├── Early in process
├── No budget confirmed
└── Timeline unclear
Forecast Scenarios:
├── Best Case Scenario
│ ├── All "Strong" deals close
│ ├── 80% of "Likely" deals close
│ ├── 50% of "Possible" deals close
│ └── Weather: Strong pipeline, good economy
│
├── Expected Case Scenario
│ ├── All "Strong" deals close
│ ├── 60% of "Likely" deals close
│ ├── 30% of "Possible" deals close
│ └── Weather: Normal pipeline, stable economy
│
├── Conservative Case Scenario
│ ├── All "Strong" deals close
│ ├── 40% of "Likely" deals close
│ ├── 10% of "Possible" deals close
│ └── Weather: Pipeline challenges, uncertain economy
│
└── Worst Case Scenario
├── 80% of "Strong" deals close
├── 20% of "Likely" deals close
└── No "Possible" deals close
Choosing Scenario:
├── Based on Historical Accuracy
│ ├── Track actual vs forecast
│ ├── Calculate variance by scenario
│ ├── Adjust based on accuracy
│ └── Document patterns
│
├── Based on Current Pipeline
│ ├── Pipeline coverage ratio
│ ├── Weighted pipeline vs quota
│ ├── Deal quality assessment
│ └── Risk factors
│
├── Based on Market Conditions
│ ├── Economic outlook
│ ├── Industry trends
│ ├── Competitive landscape
│ └── Seasonal factors
│
└── Based on Rep Performance
├── Individual track record
├── Forecast accuracy by rep
├── Historical conversion rates
└── Pipeline quality by rep
Trend Indicators:
├── Year-over-Year (YoY)
│ ├── Compare to same period last year
│ ├── Adjust for seasonality
│ └── Calculate growth rate
│
├── Month-over-Month (MoM)
│ ├── Track month-to-month changes
│ ├── Identify patterns
│ └── Adjust for anomalies
│
├── Quarter-over-Quarter (QoQ)
│ ├── Quarterly performance
│ ├── Quarter-end patterns
│ └── Quarter projection
│
└── Rolling Average
├── 3-month rolling average
├── 6-month rolling average
├── 12-month rolling average
└── Trend direction
Seasonal Adjustments:
├── Q1 Adjustments
│ ├── January: Slow (post-holiday)
│ ├── February: Building
│ ├── March: Strong (quarter-end)
│
├── Q2 Adjustments
│ ├── April: Moderate
│ ├── May: Building
│ ├── June: Strong (quarter-end)
│
├── Q3 Adjustments
│ ├── July: Slow (summer)
│ ├── August: Building
│ ├── September: Strong (quarter-end)
│
└── Q4 Adjustments
├── October: Strong
├── November: Very strong
└── December: Last push
Trend Adjustment Formula:
Adjusted Forecast = Base Forecast × (1 + Trend Factor) × (1 + Seasonality)
Anomaly Types:
├── Positive Anomalies
│ ├── Unexpected large deals
│ ├── Unusual win rate spike
│ ├── Accelerated timeline
│ └── Competitor displacement
│
├── Negative Anomalies
│ ├── Unexpected losses
│ ├── Extended sales cycles
│ ├── Budget freezes
│ └── Competitor wins
│
└── Handling Anomalies
├── Identify root cause
├── Decide to include/exclude
├── Document in forecast
└── Adjust confidence level
Forecast Dashboard:
├── Pipeline Metrics
│ ├── Total pipeline value
│ ├── Weighted pipeline value
│ ├── Pipeline coverage
│ └── Pipeline velocity
│
├── Forecast Metrics
│ ├── Best case
│ ├── Expected case
│ ├── Conservative case
│ ├── Commit (guaranteed)
│ └── Best estimate
│
├── Performance Metrics
│ ├── Quota attainment
│ ├── Attainment vs forecast
│ ├── Win rate
│ └── Average deal size
│
└── Risk Metrics
├── At-risk deals
├── Stale deals
├── Deal slippage
└── Conversion by stage
Forecast Cadence:
├── Weekly
│ ├── Rep-level deal review
│ ├── Pipeline health check
│ └── Updated probabilities
│
├── Monthly
│ ├── Forecast review meeting
│ ├── Trend analysis
│ └── Adjustments
│
├── Quarterly
│ ├── Full forecast refresh
│ ├── Scenario planning
│ ├── Quota setting input
│ └── Executive review
│
└── Annual
├── Strategic planning
├── Market-based adjustments
└── Multi-year projections
| Pattern | Odak | Uygulama |
|---|---|---|
| Pipeline Analysis | Health metrics | Coverage, velocity, quality |
| Weighted Forecast | Probability | Deal scoring, stage weights |
| Senaryo Planlama | Best/expected/conservative | Multiple outcomes |
| Trend Adjustment | Time-based | YoY, MoQ, seasonality |
| Raporlama | Dashboard | Weekly + monthly + quarterly |
Forecast errors:
- Pipeline-only forecasting
- No confidence levels
- Ignoring historical accuracy
- No scenario planning
Process errors:
- Infrequent updates
- No rep accountability
- Disconnected from reality
- Not adjusting for anomalies
Best practices:
- Weighted pipeline methodology
- Multiple scenarios
- Confidence levels
- Regular updates
Validation:
- Track actual vs forecast
- Analyze variance
- Adjust methodology
- Document assumptions
| Stage | Probability | Weighted |
|---|---|---|
| Prospecting | 10% | Deal × 0.10 |
| Qualification | 20% | Deal × 0.20 |
| Proposal | 50% | Deal × 0.50 |
| Negotiation | 75% | Deal × 0.75 |
| Closed Won | 100% | Full value |
| Metric | Target | Warning |
|---|---|---|
| Pipeline coverage | 3-4x quota | <3x |
| Win rate | >30% | <20% |
| Forecast accuracy | >85% | <70% |
| Avg sales cycle | Industry avg | >20% vs avg |
| Scenario | Use When | Adjustment |
|---|---|---|
| Best case | Strong pipeline | +20-30% |
| Expected | Normal | Base |
| Conservative | Weak pipeline | -20-30% |
| Worst case | Crisis | -40%+ |
| Frequency | Task | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly | Deal review | Rep/Manager |
| Monthly | Forecast review | Sales Lead |
| Quarterly | Full refresh | Sales Ops |
| Annual | Strategic | VP Sales |