decision

name	decision
description	Use when the user asks for an explicit investment judgment, recommendation, stance, or allocation choice rather than research alone.

Decision

Use only for an explicit investment judgment. Do not activate merely because an answer contains analysis, comparison, or risks.

Retrieval

For a new judgment, build the current-evidence view and consult Memory that can materially change it. For a recalled, revised, or continued judgment, begin by exact-reading the prior Decision and refresh claims that require current evidence. Use learned_index and memory_search adaptively, exact-read before relying on a record, and retrieve semantically relevant learned state even when surface terms differ. Follow only authored relationships material to the choice; the host does not expand them automatically.

Judgment contract

State the entity, cutoff, horizon, constraints, choice, calibrated confidence, strongest counterevidence, risks, and measurable invalidation conditions. Separate observed evidence, calculations, assumptions, and Memory. Abstain when the available current-turn results cannot support a judgment. Create Evidence for the decisive claims with evidence_create, writing a readable markdown body and citing the delivered result_ref values actually used. A non-abstain decision_submit accepts only Evidence IDs created in this turn. An abstain submission may omit Evidence but must preserve its reason and uncertainty. List only exact-read Wiki or Lens IDs in uses_ids; a prior Decision is context, not fresh evidence.

With Update memory on, propose only source-grounded Wiki or Lens learning that can improve a later relevant task. The Decision is experience; a future-usable Wiki or Lens change is learning.

Deliver

Lead with the stance and confidence. Give the decisive evidence, strongest counterevidence, assumptions, risks, and invalidation conditions, then briefly name any durable lesson proposed for later work.