| name | decision |
| description | Use when the user asks for an explicit investment judgment, recommendation, stance, or allocation choice rather than research alone. |
Decision
Use only for an explicit investment judgment. Do not activate merely because an
answer contains analysis, comparison, or risks.
Retrieval
For a new judgment, build the current-evidence view and consult Memory that can
materially change it. For a recalled, revised, or continued judgment, begin by
exact-reading the prior Decision and refresh claims that require current
evidence. Use learned_index and memory_search adaptively, exact-read before
relying on a record, and retrieve semantically relevant learned state even when
surface terms differ. Follow only authored relationships material to the
choice; the host does not expand them automatically.
Judgment contract
State the entity, cutoff, horizon, constraints, choice, calibrated confidence,
strongest counterevidence, risks, and measurable invalidation conditions.
Separate observed evidence, calculations, assumptions, and Memory. Abstain when
the available current-turn results cannot support a judgment. Create Evidence
for the decisive claims with evidence_create, writing a readable markdown
body and citing the delivered result_ref values actually used. A non-abstain
decision_submit accepts only Evidence IDs created in this turn. An abstain
submission may omit Evidence but
must preserve its reason and uncertainty. List only exact-read Wiki or Lens IDs
in uses_ids; a prior Decision is context, not fresh evidence.
With Update memory on, propose only source-grounded Wiki or Lens learning that
can improve a later relevant task. The Decision is experience; a future-usable
Wiki or Lens change is learning.
Deliver
Lead with the stance and confidence. Give the decisive evidence, strongest
counterevidence, assumptions, risks, and invalidation conditions, then briefly
name any durable lesson proposed for later work.
