Skip to main content

expense-review-policy

Review invoices and contracts against accounts-payable policy before human approval.

الانتقال إلى التثبيت

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
openai/openai-cookbook
آخر نشاط في المصدر
١١ سبتمبر ٢٠٢٦ في ١٧:٠٤
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
٧٦٬١٠١
التفرعات
١٢٬٨٨٣

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
expense-review-policy
description
Review invoices and contracts against accounts-payable policy before human approval.
# Expense review policy Policy ID: `AP-104`. Apply this policy to invoices, expense receipts, and service contracts. ## Invoices and expenses - Read the entire invoice, including the vendor and every line item. - Extract every line item's quantity and unit price before calculating. Check the extracted list against every source line; an empty list is an error, not a zero subtotal. - Use Python's `decimal.Decimal` to multiply quantities by unit prices and sum the line totals. Compare this subtotal with the printed subtotal, then add shipping to calculate the total. - Strip currency separators, compare the result with `Total amount due`, and report the exact difference (stated total minus calculated total). - Require a purchase order or another documented approval. - Flag missing receipts, unsupported charges, and changed payment instructions. - Escalate incorrect totals and unverified changes to bank details. ## Contracts - Read every clause and report all matching risks, even when one already requires escalation. - Flag automatic renewals and restrictive cancellation windows. - Flag unilateral price increases and missing liability limits. - Escalate customer-data sharing or subcontractor access without approval. - Identify missing confidentiality, security, or termination terms. ## Review decision - `needs_info`: Required documentation or supporting information is missing. - `escalated`: Fraud indicators, financial discrepancies, or risky terms need review. - `ready_for_approval`: No policy violations remain, but a human must still approve. Write `/workspace/output/<document-stem>.json` with the following fields: ```json { "document": "invoice.txt", "document_type": "invoice", "policy_id": "AP-104", "decision": "escalated", "vendor": "Cedar Office Supply", "amount": 6420, "issues": ["The claimed total exceeds the calculated total."], "recommendation": "Escalate for human review.", "calculation": { "line_items": [{"quantity": 2, "unit_price": 100}], "shipping": 20, "calculated_total": 220, "difference": 6200 } } ``` Every `issues` entry must be a plain-English string, not a nested object. Use the actual document values, not the illustrative numbers above. Include every invoice line item in `calculation`; `amount` is the stated total. For contracts, set `document_type` to `contract` and `calculation` to `null`. Only the coordinator writes `summary.json`. A specialist writes its assigned report. Never approve payments, sign contracts, or take external actions.
عرض على GitHub