Skip to main content

expense-review-policy

Review invoices and contracts against accounts-payable policy before human approval.

Ir a la instalación

Datos de origen

Repositorio
openai/openai-cookbook
Última actividad en el origen
11 de septiembre de 2026 a las 17:04
Idioma detectado de SKILL.md
inglés
Estrellas
76.101
Forks
12.883

Opciones de instalación

De forma predeterminada está seleccionado el prompt que primero revisa el origen. Puedes cambiar a un comando directo o descargar una copia local.

Revisa los archivos de origen

Lee SKILL.md y los archivos complementarios que muestra SkillsMP antes de decidir si quieres instalarlo.

Mostrando SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instrucciones de origen · Vista previa de solo lectura
name
expense-review-policy
description
Review invoices and contracts against accounts-payable policy before human approval.
# Expense review policy Policy ID: `AP-104`. Apply this policy to invoices, expense receipts, and service contracts. ## Invoices and expenses - Read the entire invoice, including the vendor and every line item. - Extract every line item's quantity and unit price before calculating. Check the extracted list against every source line; an empty list is an error, not a zero subtotal. - Use Python's `decimal.Decimal` to multiply quantities by unit prices and sum the line totals. Compare this subtotal with the printed subtotal, then add shipping to calculate the total. - Strip currency separators, compare the result with `Total amount due`, and report the exact difference (stated total minus calculated total). - Require a purchase order or another documented approval. - Flag missing receipts, unsupported charges, and changed payment instructions. - Escalate incorrect totals and unverified changes to bank details. ## Contracts - Read every clause and report all matching risks, even when one already requires escalation. - Flag automatic renewals and restrictive cancellation windows. - Flag unilateral price increases and missing liability limits. - Escalate customer-data sharing or subcontractor access without approval. - Identify missing confidentiality, security, or termination terms. ## Review decision - `needs_info`: Required documentation or supporting information is missing. - `escalated`: Fraud indicators, financial discrepancies, or risky terms need review. - `ready_for_approval`: No policy violations remain, but a human must still approve. Write `/workspace/output/<document-stem>.json` with the following fields: ```json { "document": "invoice.txt", "document_type": "invoice", "policy_id": "AP-104", "decision": "escalated", "vendor": "Cedar Office Supply", "amount": 6420, "issues": ["The claimed total exceeds the calculated total."], "recommendation": "Escalate for human review.", "calculation": { "line_items": [{"quantity": 2, "unit_price": 100}], "shipping": 20, "calculated_total": 220, "difference": 6200 } } ``` Every `issues` entry must be a plain-English string, not a nested object. Use the actual document values, not the illustrative numbers above. Include every invoice line item in `calculation`; `amount` is the stated total. For contracts, set `document_type` to `contract` and `calculation` to `null`. Only the coordinator writes `summary.json`. A specialist writes its assigned report. Never approve payments, sign contracts, or take external actions.
Ver en GitHub