strategy-csr-purpose-communications

name	strategy-csr-purpose-communications
description	Use when the main deliverable concerns CSR, community-impact, environmental, and purpose communication; use framework-digital-transparency when that neighbouring workflow owns the primary decision.
metadata	{"portable":true,"compatible_with":["claude-code","codex"]}

Strategy CSR Purpose Communications

Use When

• Use this skill for CSR, community-impact, environmental, and purpose communication.
• Use it when the requested deliverable needs the domain decisions and acceptance checks below.

Do Not Use When

• Use framework-digital-transparency when that neighbouring workflow owns the main decision or deliverable.
• Do not proceed when required evidence, approval, or safety review is absent; return the missing-input path instead.

Required Inputs

Artefact	Source/provider	Required?	If absent
Objective, audience, market, and intended decision	Client or approved brief	yes	Ask for it or state a narrow working assumption
Existing channel, content, commercial, or performance evidence relevant to CSR, community-impact, environmental, and purpose communication	Client systems, supplied files, or verified research	conditional	Mark the check unassessed and avoid performance claims
Approval, policy, budget, access, or risk constraints	Accountable client owner	conditional	Stop before publishing, spending, collecting data, or making regulated claims

Workflow

1. Confirm the decision, consumer, market, and evidence boundary; distinguish the request from framework-digital-transparency.
2. Inspect supplied artefacts and record missing or unverified inputs before drafting.
3. Apply the domain framework in this skill and use the decision rule below at each branch.
4. Stop for approval before publishing, spending, contacting people, changing live systems, or making regulated claims.
5. Review the deliverable against the quality and anti-slop gates; if a check fails, correct it and rerun the affected check.
6. Hand off the artefacts, assumptions, evidence, and unresolved risks to the named consumer.

Outputs

Artefact	Consumer	Observable acceptance condition
Csr, community-impact, environmental, and purpose communication deliverable	Client decision-maker or delivery team	Names the chosen route, owners, sequence, assumptions, and measurable acceptance checks
Decision and risk record	Reviewer or implementer	Links each recommendation to supplied evidence or labels it as an assumption

Evidence Produced

Evidence	Format	Acceptance condition
Input and assumption register	Table or annotated brief	Missing and unverified items are visible, not treated as passed
Release check	Completed quality checklist	All blocking findings are fixed or the deliverable is explicitly withheld

Capability and Permission Boundaries

Read and search are the minimum capabilities. Analysis and planning remain read-only. Edit only files placed in scope; publishing, outreach, spend, personal-data processing, production changes, and certification claims require explicit authority and evidence of success.

Degraded Mode

If files, tools, network, current evidence, rendering, or authorised access are unavailable, return the narrowest useful qualified deliverable. Mark each unavailable check not assessed; never convert it into a pass or invent market facts.

Decision Rules

Choice condition	Action	Failure or risk avoided
Impact evidence is incomplete or disputed	Publish only substantiated scope and commission evidence review	Greenwashing or overstated community benefit
Evidence is contradictory or materially incomplete	Pause the affected recommendation and request the accountable source	Confident advice built on an unresolved premise
Authority is limited to analysis or planning	Deliver a read-only plan and approval checklist	Unauthorised publication, spend, outreach, or data use

Quality Standards

• Keep Uganda/East Africa, British English, EAT, UGX, and WhatsApp-first assumptions explicit where they apply.
• Tie recommendations to observed evidence, a named assumption, or a verification action.
• Give the next operator enough detail to execute without guessing ownership, sequence, or acceptance.
• Apply ai-marketing/anti-ai-slop during drafting and block release on an F from ai-marketing/ai-slop-audit.

Anti-Patterns

• Inventing a client metric, audience fact, price, partner, or platform rule. Fix: verify it or label the decision provisional.
• Treating a missing tool, source, render, or approval as a passed check. Fix: mark it not assessed and narrow the output.
• Producing channel tactics before defining the decision and consumer. Fix: state the required outcome and handoff first.
• Copying a global template without adapting Uganda/East Africa access, language, payment, or trust conditions. Fix: record which local assumptions apply.
• Recommending publication, outreach, spend, data collection, or a regulated claim without authority. Fix: stop at an approval-ready draft.
• Reporting activity as success without an acceptance condition. Fix: name the observable result and evidence source.

References

• AGENTS.md

Required Input

Ask for all of the following before generating any deliverable:

1. Client business name and industry — trading name, sector (e.g., manufacturing, hospitality, financial services, agribusiness).
2. Country/city — default is Uganda/East Africa if not specified.
3. Current CSR activities or community programmes — what is the client already doing? List every programme, sponsorship, donation, environmental practice, or employee welfare initiative, however small.
4. Target audiences for CSR communications — who must receive and believe this narrative? Options include: employees, customers, investors, donors, regulators, community leaders, media. Each audience requires a different emphasis.
5. Business objective for CSR communications — why does this matter commercially? Options: build brand preference, strengthen employee pride and retention, satisfy investor or donor reporting requirements, maintain regulatory goodwill, differentiate from competitors.
6. Past CSR communications and their reception — has the client communicated CSR before? What was published, and how did audiences respond? Were there any accusations of greenwashing or purpose-washing?
7. Budget and content production capacity — can the client produce video? Do they have a photographer? Is this one person or a team? This determines what content formats are realistic.

---

Section 1 — Purpose vs CSR vs Greenwashing

Establish these three distinctions with the client before any communications work begins. Conflating them produces messaging that is either underwhelming or dishonest.

Purpose is a brand's core reason for existing beyond profit. It is embedded in the business model and expressed in every operational decision — sourcing, pricing, employment, and product design — not in a campaign or a press release. A Ugandan coffee exporter whose purpose is "connecting Ugandan smallholder farmers to global markets at fair prices" has built that purpose into direct-trade sourcing, transparent pricing on packaging, farmer training programmes, and export certification. Purpose cannot be invented in a communications brief. If the client cannot name a credible purpose grounded in how they actually operate, do not fabricate one — help them identify the most authentic version of their operational values first.

CSR refers to structured programmes of community or environmental investment that sit alongside the core business. CSR can be authentic or performative — the difference is whether the programmes address the business's actual impact areas. A plastics manufacturer sponsoring a rural school is CSR. That same manufacturer redesigning its packaging to reduce single-use plastic is purpose. Both are valid communications subjects, but they require different framing. CSR is most credible when it addresses harms or dependencies connected to the business: a telecoms company investing in digital literacy, a brewery investing in responsible drinking, an oil company investing in clean cookstoves. When the CSR activity has no logical connection to the business's operations, audiences notice.

Greenwashing and purpose-washing are the making of social or environmental claims that are not substantiated by evidence or action. In Uganda and East Africa, audiences — particularly NGO networks, investigative journalists at the Monitor and Observer, and educated urban professionals — are increasingly sceptical of corporate social claims. A business that posts "We are committed to a greener Uganda" with no supporting evidence invites challenge. Overclaiming destroys credibility faster than saying nothing. Apply this rule throughout: communicate only what can be evidenced. Invest first, communicate second.

---

Section 2 — CSR Audit

Complete this audit table before producing any communications. Only activities with available evidence move to the communications stage. If evidence does not exist, advise the client to create it (measurement, documentation, photography, beneficiary consent) before publishing claims.

CSR Area	Current Activity	Evidence Available	Communication Potential
Community investment	e.g., school sponsorship, borehole construction, sports team	Receipts, photos, beneficiary numbers, headteacher letter	High if evidenced
Environmental practice	e.g., waste reduction programme, solar power, tree planting, effluent management	Utility bills, NEMA certification, measurement data, before/after photography	High if measured
Employee welfare	e.g., health insurance, skills training, above-minimum wage, maternity provision	Policy documents, payroll data, employee testimonials	Medium — requires employee consent
Local sourcing	e.g., buy-Uganda policy, % of suppliers registered in Uganda, smallholder partnerships	Supplier register, procurement %, farmer names with consent	High if data is available
Women and youth inclusion	e.g., % women in management, youth internship programme, gender pay equity	HR data, programme enrolment figures, personal stories	High if authentic and consented
Tax compliance	e.g., TIN registered, URA compliant, publicly declared tax contributions	URA TIN visible on communications, public accounts	Medium — credibility signal, not a headline

Flag clearly: any column where evidence is absent means the activity cannot be communicated yet. Record it as a future communications opportunity once evidence is in place.

---

Section 3 — Content Strategy for CSR

Generate a content plan using these four content types. Apply the Hero/Hub/Hygiene model (YouTube/Google): impact stories are Hero content (high-effort, high-reach); progress reports and behind-the-scenes are Hub content (regular, relationship-building); employee voice is Hygiene content (always-on, low-cost).

1. Impact stories Feature a named beneficiary — with documented consent — describing how the brand's activity made a measurable difference in their life. One story with a human face outperforms a headline statistic every time. Format: short video (60–90 seconds) for Facebook, YouTube, and WhatsApp status, or a high-quality photograph with a long-form caption for Facebook and Instagram. Example: "Meet Grace, a Primary Seven pupil at Kyambogo Primary School — one of 120 children whose classroom was renovated through our 2025 Community Fund. Before the renovation, the class had no windows and no desks. Grace now sits her PLE exams in a room with electricity." Distribute via Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp broadcast to customers and partners.

2. Progress reports Publish annual or semi-annual updates on measurable commitments, including where targets were missed. Honest reporting builds more trust than consistent claims of success. Format: infographic carousel (Facebook/Instagram) or a downloadable PDF report for LinkedIn and investor communications. Example: "In 2025, we committed to planting 800 trees across three districts. We planted 500. Delayed rains in Karamoja reduced our planting window by six weeks. In 2026, we are partnering with the National Forestry Authority to extend to a fourth district and plant 1,200 trees." Publish once or twice per year. Share via all owned channels and distribute to media contacts.

3. Behind the scenes Show how the business actually operates — sourcing practices, production processes, employment conditions. Authenticity is the objective, not a polished corporate image. Imperfect footage of a real operation is more credible than a produced corporate video. Format: video series (60–180 seconds per episode) for Facebook and YouTube, or photo series for Instagram. Example: "This is how we buy coffee directly from 47 farming families in Sipi, Bugisu. We pay above the commodity price because we believe farmers who earn more plant better. Here is what that means for the Wamala family." Produce quarterly. Archive on YouTube as a reference for journalists and investors.

4. Employee voice Feature staff members speaking — voluntarily and without a script — about what working at the company means to them. Must be genuinely voluntary: employees who appear reluctant or coached undermine the message. Avoid producing "happy employee" content that reads as forced. Format: short video (30–60 seconds) for Facebook and LinkedIn, or a quote card with photograph for Instagram. Example: "Prosper Atukwatse joined us as a boda driver five years ago. He now manages logistics for our Kampala distribution network. In his words: 'They paid for my driving certificate and then they gave me responsibility. I didn't expect that.'" Produce monthly. Use on LinkedIn for employer brand and on Facebook for community credibility.

---

Section 4 — Messaging Framework

Apply these five principles to every piece of CSR content. Review all draft copy against this framework before approval.

1. Specificity over generality "We employ 87% Ugandan suppliers across our five product lines" beats "We support local businesses." Numbers, names, places, and dates are the currency of credibility. If the client cannot supply specific data, return to the CSR audit and gather it before publishing.

2. Show, do not claim Post the evidence — the photograph of the borehole with GPS coordinates, the signed letter from the school headteacher, the faces and names of beneficiaries (with consent) — not just the headline claim. On Facebook and WhatsApp, evidence-first posts generate more organic engagement and are harder to challenge than text-only announcements.

3. Acknowledge complexity Brands operating in developing markets often have complex impact profiles: they create jobs but also generate waste; they pay taxes but benefit from subsidies; they empower communities but also extract resources. Acknowledge where the business contributes to challenges as well as solutions — this builds credibility with NGO networks, regulators, and journalists. Example: "We use plastic packaging across our product range. We are committed to reducing single-use plastic by 30% by 2027 through a partnership with GreenPath Uganda. Here is our progress so far." Admitting the problem is not weakness — it is the foundation of a believable improvement narrative.

4. Community voice, not brand voice CSR content should feature community members, beneficiaries, employees, and local leaders — not the CEO or the marketing manager. The organisation's leadership can appear as supporters and enablers, not as the hero of the story. In Uganda's cultural context, a community elder or a beneficiary mother speaking to camera carries significantly more weight than a corporate spokesperson reading from a script.

5. Regulatory context Reference relevant Ugandan and East African regulatory bodies where applicable — the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) for environmental claims, the Equal Opportunities Commission for gender and inclusion claims, the Uganda Revenue Authority (URA) for tax contributions, and the Uganda Registration Services Bureau (URSB) for corporate governance. Citing these bodies signals that the business operates within and in support of the regulatory framework, which is a credibility signal for investors, donors, and government stakeholders.

---

Section 5 — East Africa-Specific Considerations

Apply all of the following as defaults for Uganda/East Africa. Adjust only if the client specifies a different market.

Community trust as social capital In Uganda, consistent local presence builds a form of social capital that protects a business's reputation during difficult periods — price increases, operational disruptions, or regulatory scrutiny. A business known to have invested in its local community (a school, a health post, a water source) is afforded more goodwill than one that communicates only during crises. Frame CSR communications as part of a long-term relationship with the community, not a one-off event.

Religious and community institutions Churches and mosques are among the most trusted institutions in Uganda. CSR activities that are endorsed by, conducted alongside, or visible to religious leaders carry additional credibility — particularly in rural and peri-urban communities. Where genuine relationships with religious or community institutions exist, feature those relationships in content (with the institution's consent). Do not manufacture these relationships for communications purposes.

Children's photography — non-negotiable consent rule Do not photograph, film, or name any child under 18 without documented parental or guardian consent. Uganda's Children Act (Cap. 59) and the National Council for Children's guidelines require consent for publication of a child's image. Any CSR content featuring children must include a consent log. If consent documentation is not available, do not publish. This applies to social media, press releases, annual reports, and all other formats. Breach of this rule exposes the client to legal liability and reputational damage.

Greenwashing risk is increasing Investigative journalists at the Monitor, the Observer, and NBS Television, as well as social media commentators and NGO networks, are more likely now than five years ago to challenge unsupported corporate social claims. Before publishing any CSR claim, apply this test: if a journalist asked for evidence of this claim tomorrow, could the client produce it? If the answer is no, do not publish the claim. Advise the client to create the evidence first.

Local language and accessibility CSR content targeting community audiences — in rural districts, peri-urban Kampala, or communities where the brand operates physically — should include Luganda captions, translations, or voiceovers. Content produced only in English excludes the communities the brand claims to serve. For other regions: include Runyankole/Rukiga for western Uganda, Acholi/Luo for northern Uganda, and Lusoga for eastern Uganda where relevant. Use the east-african-english skill to calibrate tone for English-language content.

Platform selection for CSR audiences

Audience	Primary channel	Format
Community members and customers	Facebook, WhatsApp	Video, photo + caption
Urban professionals and employees	LinkedIn, Instagram	Carousel, quote card, short video
Media and journalists	X/Twitter, press release via WhatsApp	Statement, evidence pack
Investors and donors	LinkedIn, email, PDF report	Progress report, annual impact summary
Regulators and government	LinkedIn, formal letter, PDF	Compliance narrative, regulatory alignment

---

Quality Criteria

Good output from this skill meets all of the following:

• The distinction between purpose, CSR, and greenwashing is stated clearly and applied consistently — no content claims purpose when the evidence supports only CSR.
• The CSR audit table is completed before any content strategy is produced — unevidenced activities are flagged as future opportunities, not current claims.
• The evidence requirement is stated explicitly for every claim: every CSR assertion is linked to a specific piece of evidence (photo, data, document, name).
• All four content types (impact stories, progress reports, behind the scenes, employee voice) are represented in the content plan, with Uganda/East Africa-specific examples.
• The children's photography consent rule is stated and applied — no content featuring minors is approved without documented parental or guardian consent.
• Greenwashing risk is acknowledged and mitigated — the journalist test is applied to all claims before publication.
• The messaging framework (specificity, show don't claim, acknowledge complexity, community voice, regulatory context) is applied to all draft content before approval.

---

References

• See 05-social-media-strategy/SKILL.md for the broader social media strategy framework within which CSR communications sits. Use this skill in conjunction with the channel strategy and content calendar produced there.
• See playbook-reputation-management/SKILL.md when CSR communications is being used to respond to or mitigate a reputational crisis — the two skills overlap when a brand faces public scrutiny of its social or environmental conduct.
• See biz-dev-credentials/SKILL.md when CSR communications outputs (impact reports, case studies, beneficiary stories) are being incorporated into client pitch credentials or agency credentials.
• See east-african-english/SKILL.md for language, tone, and register standards. Apply to all English-language CSR content before publication.