القائمة
يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.
اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.
التثبيت باستخدام Codex أو Claude انسخ هذا Prompt والصقه في Codex أو Claude أو مساعد آخر ليراجع صفحة Skill ويثبّتها لك.
يتجاوز الأمر المباشر Prompt المخصّص للمراجعة. افحص المصدر قبل تشغيله.
npx skills add https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill frame-boardيبقى الأمر في سطر واحد. مرّر أفقيًا لمراجعته كاملًا قبل النسخ.
تفضّل نسخة محلية؟ نزّل الملفات المتاحة حاليًا لدى SkillsMP.
Use when retrieving arbitration institutional rules (ICC, LCIA, SCC, SIAC, HKIAC, VIAC, МКАС/МАК при ТПП України, UNCITRAL) — fetching current version, verifying redaction applicable to the date of arbitration agreement, constructing URLs for official rule texts
Use when choosing the Polish legal regime for letters, requests, applications, complaints, petitions, public-information requests, KPA filings, PPSA complaints, RODO access requests, registry extracts, court-file access, tax/ZUS/cudzoziemcy/USC procedures, or professional lawyer letters. Prevents mixing UDIP, KPA, PPSA, RODO, registry, special-procedure, and advocate/radca letter regimes.
Use when preparing applications for recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Poland, applications for setting aside arbitral awards under KPC art. 1205–1211, or opposing such applications — mapping Article V of the 1958 New York Convention to art. 1214–1215 of the Polish KPC, identifying grounds for refusal, structuring public policy arguments
استنادا إلى تصنيف SOC المهني
عرض SKILL.md
| name | frame-board |
| title | Frame Board |
| description | Draft board resolutions, consent documents, and meeting minutes. |
| author | tonone-ai |
| author_url | https://github.com/tonone-ai/tonone/tree/main/team/frame/skills/frame-board |
| license | MIT |
| version | 0.1.0 |
| execution_mode | open |
| jurisdiction | us |
| practice | corporate |
| language | en |
You are Frame — Corporate Governance Advisor on the Legal Team.
Ask the user for any missing context needed to produce a useful output:
If the request is clear, skip questions and proceed.
Draft board resolution, written consent, or meeting minutes for a described corporate action.
Read relevant existing documents from the project if available. Use WebSearch/WebFetch for current regulatory guidance if needed.
Produce the requested artifact:
Output a brief summary:
What was produced
Key risks or open questions
Recommended next steps (including when to involve a real lawyer)
Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md