Skip to main content

thinking-cynefin

When the right response mode is unclear, classify the cause-effect domain first; decompose disorder.

الانتقال إلى التثبيت

معلومات المصدر

المستودع
tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills
آخر نشاط في المصدر
١٧ يوليو ٢٠٢٦ في ٠١:٣٩
لغة SKILL.md المكتشفة
الإنجليزية
النجوم
١٬٣١٧
التفرعات
١٥٨

خيارات التثبيت

يُحدَّد Prompt الذي يراجع المصدر أولًا بشكل افتراضي. يمكنك التبديل إلى أمر مباشر أو تنزيل نسخة محلية.

مراجعة ملفات المصدر

اقرأ SKILL.md وأي ملفات مرافقة يعرضها SkillsMP قبل أن تقرر التثبيت.

عرض SKILL.md

SKILL.md
تعليمات المصدر · معاينة للقراءة فقط
name
thinking-cynefin
description
When the right response mode is unclear, classify the cause-effect domain first; decompose disorder.
disable-model-invocation
true
# Cynefin Classification Classify by cause-effect, then use only the matching response mode. Wrong-domain method is the failure mode. ## When to Use - Unsure whether to run a playbook, analyze, probe, or stabilize. - A method keeps failing and domain mismatch is plausible. - A novel or mixed problem needs approach selection before solution work. ## When NOT to Use - Domain and method are already agreed—execute. - Task is finding a specific cause, not choosing an approach. - Classification done; switch to the domain method—do not re-label endlessly. - Pure mechanical edits with no approach uncertainty. ## Procedure 1. **State the unit.** Name the decision, incident, or subsystem; if mixed, list separable parts. 2. **Probe cause-effect.** Is the link obvious, expert-analyzable, retrospective only, or imperceptible in turbulence? Check predictability, urgency, and probe safety. 3. **Assign one domain per unit:** - **Clear** — obvious → Sense → Categorize → Respond with a runbook. - **Complicated** — expert-analyzable → Sense → Analyze → Respond; several valid answers. - **Complex** — emergent → Probe → Sense → Respond with safe-to-fail probes; amplify/dampen signals. - **Chaotic** — no safe sensing time → Act → Sense → Respond; stabilize first. - **Disorder** — unknown → split and classify each part. 4. **Mismatch check.** Reject Clear if its runbook fails; Complicated if analysis cannot predict; Complex if probing is unsafe; Chaotic once safe probing becomes possible. 5. **Commit and stop.** Output domain + first actions. Re-classify only on evidence of domain shift. **Stop when** every unit has one domain, first actions, and a falsifier—or disorder is decomposed. ## Output ```text unit: <decision/incident/part> domain: clear | complicated | complex | chaotic | disorder evidence: <cause-effect basis> response_mode: <Sense-Categorize-Respond | Sense-Analyze-Respond | Probe-Sense-Respond | Act-Sense-Respond | decompose> first_actions: <1-3 concrete steps> falsifier: <what forces reclassification> parts: <only if disorder> ``` ## Verification - **Falsify:** Reliable prediction → not Complex. No safe probe → Chaotic. Working runbook → Clear. - **Stop:** Stop classifying once the matched action is clear. - **Over-application guard:** Do not call work Complex to avoid analysis or Complicated to avoid a standard fix. One label per unit; decompose multi-domain work.
عرض على GitHub