Skip to main content

review

Review built feature/application output against the @adobe/data feature rules; report whether it is optimal and where any fix belongs. Read-only.

Source facts

Repository
adobe/data
Last source activity
October 6, 2026 at 16:55
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
12
Forks
8

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
review
disable-model-invocation
true
description
Review built feature/application output against the @adobe/data feature rules; report whether it is optimal and where any fix belongs. Read-only.
input
a path to built output (a layer, a feature, or a whole app)
output
a review — OPTIMAL, or a list of issues each tagged code | skill | rule
Check a legacy feature (has `data/state/` or `services/main-service/`) against the legacy rules; don't flag the layout itself. Read the files under the given path and assess them against the relevant `features/` rules (each layer's rule and the cross-cutting rules — `namespace`, `data-modelling`, `type-casts`, `cohesion`, …): - **Correctness** — does it typecheck and follow the layer's required shape? - **Adherence** — single public export per file, naming, per-file scope flags (`Scope`), `satisfies` targets, barrels, the layer dependency order (no runtime import of `spec/`), store-layer typing, etc. - **Generality** — no leaked type identities; follows the cross-cutting patterns. Report either **OPTIMAL**, or a short list of issues. Tag each issue with where the root-cause fix belongs: - `code` — a one-off slip in the generated files (guidance is fine), - `skill` — the phase skill's instructions are unclear, wrong, or incomplete, - `rule` — a referenced rule is unclear, wrong, or missing guidance. Do not edit anything — assessment only.
View on GitHub