Skip to main content

web-security-audit

Expert guidance on identifying and mitigating common web vulnerabilities from a bug hunter's perspective. Covers access control, XSS, CSRF, SSRF, insecure file uploads, and JWT security with detailed protection strategies, implementation patterns, and verification checklists.

Jump to install

Source facts

Repository
aibot88/sec_skill_store
Last source activity
May 27, 2026 at 03:47
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
3
Forks
0

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

File Explorer
2 files

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
web-security-audit
description
Expert guidance on identifying and mitigating common web vulnerabilities from a bug hunter's perspective. Covers access control, XSS, CSRF, SSRF, insecure file uploads, and JWT security with detailed protection strategies, implementation patterns, and verification checklists.
license
Complete terms in file LICENSE
# Secure Coding Guide for Web Applications ## Overview This guide provides comprehensive secure coding practices for web applications. As an AI assistant, your role is to approach code from a **bug hunter's perspective** and make applications **as secure as possible** without breaking functionality. **Key Principles:** - Defense in depth: Never rely on a single security control - Fail securely: When something fails, fail closed (deny access) - Least privilege: Grant minimum permissions necessary - Input validation: Never trust user input, validate everything server-side - Output encoding: Encode data appropriately for the context it's rendered in --- ## Access Control Issues Access control vulnerabilities occur when users can access resources or perform actions beyond their intended permissions. ### Core Requirements For **every data point and action** that requires authentication: 1. **User-Level Authorization** - Each user must only access/modify their own data - No user should access data from other users or organizations - Always verify ownership at the data layer, not just the route level 2. **Use UUIDs Instead of Sequential IDs** - Use UUIDv4 or similar non-guessable identifiers - Exception: Only use sequential IDs if explicitly requested by user 3. **Account Lifecycle Handling** - When a user is removed from an organization: immediately revoke all access tokens and sessions - When an account is deleted/deactivated: invalidate all active sessions and API keys - Implement token revocation lists or short-lived tokens with refresh mechanisms ### Authorization Checks Checklist - [ ] Verify user owns the resource on every request (don't trust client-side data) - [ ] Check organization membership for multi-tenant apps - [ ] Validate role permissions for role-based actions - [ ] Re-validate permissions after any privilege change - [ ] Check parent resource ownership (e.g., if accessing a comment, verify user owns the parent post) ### Common Pitfalls to Avoid - **IDOR (Insecure Direct Object Reference)**: Always verify the requesting user has permission to access the requested resource ID - **Privilege Escalation**: Validate role changes server-side; never trust role info from client - **Horizontal Access**: User A accessing User B's resources with the same privilege level - **Vertical Access**: Regular user accessing admin functionality - **Mass Assignment**: Filter which fields users can update; don't blindly accept all request body fields ### Implementation Pattern ``` # Pseudocode for secure resource access function getResource(resourceId, currentUser): resource = database.find(resourceId) if resource is null: return 404 # Don't reveal if resource exists if resource.ownerId != currentUser.id: if not currentUser.hasOrgAccess(resource.orgId): return 404 # Return 404, not 403, to prevent enumeration return resource ``` --- ## Client-Side Bugs ### Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Every input controllable by the user—whether directly or indirectly—must be sanitized against XSS. #### Input Sources to Protect **Direct Inputs:** - Form fields (email, name, bio, comments, etc.) - Search queries - File names during upload - Rich text editors / WYSIWYG content **Indirect Inputs:** - URL parameters and query strings - URL fragments (hash values) - HTTP headers used in the application (Referer, User-Agent if displayed) - Data from third-party APIs displayed to users - WebSocket messages - postMessage data from iframes - LocalStorage/SessionStorage values if rendered **Often Overlooked:** - Error messages that reflect user input - PDF/document generators that accept HTML - Email templates with user data - Log viewers in admin panels - JSON responses rendered as HTML - SVG file uploads (can contain JavaScript) - Markdown rendering (if allowing HTML) #### Protection Strategies 1. **Output Encoding** (Context-Specific) - HTML context: HTML entity encode (`<` → `&lt;`) - JavaScript context: JavaScript escape - URL context: URL encode - CSS context: CSS escape - Use framework's built-in escaping (React's JSX, Vue's {{ }}, etc.) 2. **Content Security Policy (CSP)** ``` Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: https:; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self' https://api.yourdomain.com; frame-ancestors 'none'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'self'; ``` - Avoid `'unsafe-inline'` and `'unsafe-eval'` for scripts - Use nonces or hashes for inline scripts when necessary - Report violations: `report-uri /csp-report` 3. **Input Sanitization** - Use established libraries (DOMPurify for HTML) - Whitelist allowed tags/attributes for rich text - Strip or encode dangerous patterns 4. **Additional Headers** - `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff` - `X-Frame-Options: DENY` (or use CSP frame-ancestors) --- ### Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) Every state-changing endpoint must be protected against CSRF attacks. #### Endpoints Requiring CSRF Protection **Authenticated Actions:** - All POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE requests - Any GET request that changes state (fix these to use proper HTTP methods) - File uploads - Settings changes - Payment/transaction endpoints **Pre-Authentication Actions:** - Login endpoints (prevent login CSRF) - Signup endpoints - Password reset request endpoints - Password change endpoints - Email/phone verification endpoints - OAuth callback endpoints #### Protection Mechanisms 1. **CSRF Tokens** - Generate cryptographically random tokens - Tie token to user session - Validate on every state-changing request - Regenerate after login (prevent session fixation combo) 2. **SameSite Cookies** ``` Set-Cookie: session=abc123; SameSite=Strict; Secure; HttpOnly ``` - `Strict`: Cookie never sent cross-site (best security) - `Lax`: Cookie sent on top-level navigations (good balance) - Always combine with CSRF tokens for defense in depth 3. **Double Submit Cookie Pattern** - Send CSRF token in both cookie and request body/header - Server validates they match #### Edge Cases and Common Mistakes - **Token presence check**: CSRF validation must NOT depend on whether the token is present, always require it - **Token per form**: Consider unique tokens per form for sensitive operations - **JSON APIs**: Don't assume JSON content-type prevents CSRF; validate Origin/Referer headers AND use tokens - **CORS misconfiguration**: Overly permissive CORS can bypass SameSite cookies - **Subdomains**: CSRF tokens should be scoped because subdomain takeover can lead to CSRF - **Flash/PDF uploads**: Legacy browser plugins could bypass SameSite - **GET requests with side effects**: Never perform state changes on GET - **Token leakage**: Don't include CSRF tokens in URLs - **Token in URL vs Header**: Prefer custom headers (X-CSRF-Token) over URL parameters #### Verification Checklist - [ ] Token is cryptographically random (use secure random generator) - [ ] Token is tied to user session - [ ] Token is validated server-side on all state-changing requests - [ ] Missing token = rejected request - [ ] Token regenerated on authentication state change - [ ] SameSite cookie attribute is set - [ ] Secure and HttpOnly flags on session cookies --- ### Secret Keys and Sensitive Data Exposure No secrets or sensitive information should be accessible to client-side code. #### Never Expose in Client-Side Code **API Keys and Secrets:** - Third-party API keys (Stripe, AWS, etc.) - Database connection strings - JWT signing secrets - Encryption keys - OAuth client secrets - Internal service URLs/credentials **Sensitive User Data:** - Full credit card numbers - Social Security Numbers - Passwords (even hashed) - Security questions/answers - Full phone numbers (mask them: **_-_**-1234) - Sensitive PII that isn't needed for display **Infrastructure Details:** - Internal IP addresses - Database schemas - Debug information - Stack traces in production - Server software versions #### Where Secrets Hide (Check These!) - JavaScript bundles (including source maps) - HTML comments - Hidden form fields - Data attributes - LocalStorage/SessionStorage - Initial state/hydration data in SSR apps - Environment variables exposed via build tools (NEXT*PUBLIC*_, REACT*APP*_) #### Best Practices 1. **Environment Variables**: Store secrets in `.env` files 2. **Server-Side Only**: Make API calls requiring secrets from backend only --- ## Open Redirect Any endpoint accepting a URL for redirection must be protected against open redirect attacks. ### Protection Strategies 1. **Allowlist Validation** ``` allowed_domains = ['yourdomain.com', 'app.yourdomain.com'] function isValidRedirect(url): parsed = parseUrl(url) return parsed.hostname in allowed_domains ``` 2. **Relative URLs Only** - Only accept paths (e.g., `/dashboard`) not full URLs - Validate the path starts with `/` and doesn't contain `//` 3. **Indirect References** - Use a mapping instead of raw URLs: `?redirect=dashboard` → lookup to `/dashboard` ### Bypass Techniques to Block | Technique | Example | Why It Works | |-----------------------|----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------| | @ symbol | `https://legit.com@evil.com` | Browser navigates to evil.com with legit.com as username | | Subdomain abuse | `https://legit.com.evil.com` | evil.com owns the subdomain | | Protocol tricks | `javascript:alert(1)` | XSS via redirect | | Double URL encoding | `%252f%252fevil.com` | Decodes to `//evil.com` after double decode | | Backslash | `https://legit.com\@evil.com` | Some parsers normalize `\` to `/` | | Null byte | `https://legit.com%00.evil.com` | Some parsers truncate at null | | Tab/newline | `https://legit.com%09.evil.com` | Whitespace confusion | | Unicode normalization | `https://legіt.com` (Cyrillic і) | IDN homograph attack | | Data URLs | `data:text/html,<script>...` | Direct payload execution | | Protocol-relative | `//evil.com` | Uses current page's protocol | | Fragment abuse | `https://legit.com#@evil.com` | Parsed differently by different libraries | ### IDN Homograph Attack Protection - Convert URLs to Punycode before validation - Consider blocking non-ASCII domains entirely for sensitive redirects --- ### Password Security #### Password Requirements - Minimum 8 characters (12+ recommended) - No maximum length (or very high, e.g., 128 chars) - Allow all characters including special chars - Don't require specific character types (let users choose strong passwords) #### Storage - Use Argon2id, bcrypt, or scrypt - Never MD5, SHA1, or plain SHA256 --- ## Server-Side Bugs ### Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Any functionality where the server makes requests to URLs provided or influenced by users must be protected. #### Potential Vulnerable Features - Webhooks (user provides callback URL) - URL previews - PDF generators from URLs - Image/file fetching from URLs - Import from URL features - RSS/feed readers - API integrations with user-provided endpoints - Proxy functionality - HTML to PDF/image converters #### Protection Strategies 1. **Allowlist Approach** (Preferred) - Only allow requests to pre-approved domains - Maintain a strict allowlist for integrations 2. **Network Segmentation** - Run URL-fetching services in isolated network - Block access to internal network, cloud metadata #### IP and DNS Bypass Techniques to Block | Technique | Example | Description | |----------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------| | Decimal IP | `http://2130706433` | 127.0.0.1 as decimal | | Octal IP | `http://0177.0.0.1` | Octal representation | | Hex IP | `http://0x7f.0x0.0x0.0x1` | Hexadecimal | | IPv6 localhost | `http://[::1]` | IPv6 loopback | | IPv6 mapped IPv4 | `http://[::ffff:127.0.0.1]` | IPv4-mapped IPv6 | | Short IPv6 | `http://[::]` | All zeros | | DNS rebinding | Attacker's DNS returns internal IP | First request resolves to external IP, second to internal | | CNAME to internal | Attacker domain CNAMEs to internal | DNS points to internal hostname | | URL parser confusion | `http://attacker.com#@internal` | Different parsing behaviors | | Redirect chains | External URL redirects to internal | Follow redirects carefully | | IPv6 scope ID | `http://[fe80::1%25eth0]` | Interface-scoped IPv6 | | Rare IP formats | `http://127.1` | Shortened IP notation | #### DNS Rebinding Prevention 1. Resolve DNS before making request 2. Validate resolved IP is not internal 3. Pin the resolved IP for the request (don't re-resolve) 4. Or: Resolve twice with delay, ensure both resolve to same external IP #### Cloud Metadata Protection Block access to cloud metadata endpoints: - AWS: `169.254.169.254` - GCP: `metadata.google.internal`, `169.254.169.254`, `http://metadata` - Azure: `169.254.169.254` - DigitalOcean: `169.254.169.254` #### Implementation Checklist - [ ] Validate URL scheme is HTTP/HTTPS only - [ ] Resolve DNS and validate IP is not private/internal - [ ] Block cloud metadata IPs explicitly - [ ] Limit or disable redirect following - [ ] If following redirects, validate each hop - [ ] Set timeout on requests - [ ] Limit response size - [ ] Use network isolation where possible --- ### Insecure File Upload File uploads must validate type, content, and size to prevent various attacks. #### Validation Requirements **1. File Type Validation** - Check file extension against allowlist - Validate magic bytes/file signature match expected type - Never rely on just one check **2. File Content Validation** - Read and verify magic bytes - For images: attempt to process with image library (detects malformed files) - For documents: scan for macros, embedded objects - Check for polyglot files (files valid as multiple types) **3. File Size Limits**
View on GitHub
This SKILL.md is very large, so SkillsMP previews the first section here. View on GitHub