Skip to main content

context-loading-protocol

Decide which agents and skills to load for a given task. Use at the start of every task to select the minimum viable context load, calculate the token budget, and stay below the 40% utilization ceiling.

Source facts

Repository
bdfinst/agentic-dev-team
Last source activity
September 30, 2026 at 21:21
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
295
Forks
36

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
context-loading-protocol
description
Decide which agents and skills to load for a given task. Use at the start of every task to select the minimum viable context load, calculate the token budget, and stay below the 40% utilization ceiling.
role
orchestrator
user-invocable
true
# Context Loading Protocol Token-budget reference (CLAUDE.md baseline, full-load ceiling, per-agent and per-skill costs) is the **Baseline Budget** section of `CLAUDE.md`. This skill is the runtime procedure; don't duplicate the table here — it goes stale. ## Constraints - Never load all agents upfront; load only the primary agent for each phase. - Keep total context below **40%** of the model's window at all times. - Load agents on demand when their phase begins, not speculatively. - Use tool-based file reads (Read); do not paste file contents into the prompt. ## Enforcement No hook blocks or warns on capability loads any more (the former context ceiling hook was removed; see [ADR 0043](../../../../docs/adr/0043-replace-the-context-ceiling-guard-with-harness-autocompact.md)). The harness compacts the conversation itself at the percentage `/dev-team:setup` writes to the repo's `.claude/settings.json` (`CLAUDE_AUTOCOMPACT_PCT_OVERRIDE`, default 40). Repos that never ran `/setup` keep the harness default, which is much later, and get a one-line advisory at session start. After a compaction, a `compact` SessionStart hook re-injects the active `/build` phase, step and plan progress. So the budget estimate below is the planning tool you apply *before* loading, and `/handoff` is yours to run by hand when a deliberate, structured summary is worth more than a generic compaction. ### Why 40% The 40% default is a conservative planning target, not a claimed accuracy cliff. Chroma's [Context Rot study](https://www.trychroma.com/research/context-rot) found degradation across 18 models (including Claude 4) is gradual, not a sharp drop at any single percentage. Needle-in-a-haystack benchmarks like RULER and NoLiMa show a model's *effective* context is often only about half its advertised window, with sharp accuracy drops on non-lexical retrieval well before the window limit. Anthropic's [effective context engineering guidance](https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/effective-context-engineering-for-ai-agents) recommends proactive compaction well ahead of the limit. Given that evidence, budgeting to 40% of the window leaves headroom before quality degrades, rather than chasing a precise threshold that doesn't exist. There is no absolute token cap: the percentage applies to the window, so 40% of a 1M window is 400K. Full guide — how the threshold is configured, the two SessionStart hooks, troubleshooting: [Context Management](../../docs/context-management.md). ## Loading Decision Procedure ### Step 0: Confirm there is a task Before loading anything or reading files, confirm an actionable instruction exists. If the user has not yet said what they want, wait — do not speculatively read files, verify code, or load agents. Premature investigation before a task is given wastes context and is a common interrupt trigger. Once a task exists, proceed to Step 1. ### Step 1: Classify the task | Profile | Description | Example | |---|---|---| | **Simple/Single** | One agent, no skills | "Fix this typo", "Write a unit test" | | **Standard/Single** | One agent + 1–2 skills | "Implement this feature using hexagonal architecture" | | **Multi-Agent** | 2–3 agents coordinating | "Design and implement a new API endpoint" | | **Complex/Multi** | 3+ agents + skills | "Build a new bounded context with full test coverage" | ### Step 2: Select agents Load the **minimum set**: 1. Identify the **primary agent** (owns the deliverable). 2. Identify **supporting agents** (input or review). 3. Do NOT load agents for downstream validation yet — load them when their phase begins. Order: primary first, then supporting agents one at a time as their phase begins. ### Step 3: Select skills For each loaded agent, check its `## Skills` section: - Only load skills **relevant to the current task** — not all skills the agent references. - Skills shared by multiple loaded agents only need to be loaded once. ### Step 4: Calculate token budget ``` Total = CLAUDE.md baseline + conversation history (estimate) + agent files (sum selected) + skill files (sum selected) + expected output (estimate) ``` **Target: total < 40% of the model's context window.** For Claude with a 200K window, that's < 80K tokens; on a 1M-window model it is 400K (there is no absolute cap). See [Why 40%](#why-40) for the rationale. The config files are a small fraction; the real budget concern is conversation history + output accumulation over multi-turn tasks. ### Step 5: Load via tool-based file reads ``` Read agents/software-engineer.md Read skills/hexagonal-architecture/SKILL.md ``` Do NOT copy file contents into the system prompt or conversation. ## Loading Profiles Pre-computed loading sets for common task types. ### Code Implementation - **Load**: Software Engineer + relevant skill(s) - **Defer**: QA (load after implementation), Architect (load only if design questions arise) ### Architecture Design - **Load**: Architect + relevant architecture skill(s) - **Defer**: Software Engineer (load at implementation), QA (load at validation) ### Bug Fix - **Load**: Software Engineer only - **Defer**: QA (load if regression test needed) ### New Feature (full lifecycle) Three phases, each in a fresh context window with a human review gate between. Each phase's output is a structured progress file in `.claude/memory/` that onboards the next phase. | Phase | Load | Purpose | Output | |---|---|---|---| | 1. Research | Orchestrator + sub-agents (exploration) | Understand system, find files, trace data flows | Research progress file | | 2. Plan | Architect + PM (if needed) + relevant skill(s) | Specify every change: files, snippets, tests | Implementation plan progress file | | 3. Implement | Software Engineer + QA + skill(s) | Execute the plan; code, tests | Working code + test results | Key rules: - Each phase starts with a fresh context window, loading only the previous phase's progress file. - Human reviews and approves the progress file before the next phase begins. - Sub-agents primarily provide context isolation — they search, read, and return concise findings. - If implementation is large, compact mid-phase: update the plan progress file with completed steps and continue in a fresh context. ## Unloading Since tokens can't be literally removed from context: 1. **Phase transitions** — summarize completed phase output into `.claude/memory/` and start a new conversation for the next phase. 2. **Within a conversation** — stop referencing the agent/skill; the orchestrator mentally notes it's no longer active. Use the Handoff skill (continue mode) to compress stale content. 3. **Multi-turn accumulation** — when conversation history crosses **30%** utilization, trigger summarization before loading additional agents. ## Anti-patterns - Loading all agents upfront — wastes tokens before any work begins. Load only the primary agent. - Loading all of an agent's skills — most are irrelevant to the specific request. - Never unloading — context grows monotonically until hallucination risk. Summarize and phase-transition. - Loading agents "just in case" — adds cost without value. Load on demand when the phase begins. ## Output Loading plan as one table: selected agents + skills, token costs, estimated total, and utilization percentage against the 40% ceiling. No narration.
View on GitHub