Skip to main content

context-loading-protocol

Decide which agents and skills to load for a given task. Use at the start of every task to select the minimum viable context load, calculate the token budget, and stay below the 40% utilization ceiling.

소스 정보

저장소
bdfinst/agentic-dev-team
최근 소스 활동
2026년 9월 30일 21:21
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
299
포크
36

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
context-loading-protocol
description
Decide which agents and skills to load for a given task. Use at the start of every task to select the minimum viable context load, calculate the token budget, and stay below the 40% utilization ceiling.
role
orchestrator
user-invocable
true
# Context Loading Protocol Token-budget reference (CLAUDE.md baseline, full-load ceiling, per-agent and per-skill costs) is the **Baseline Budget** section of `CLAUDE.md`. This skill is the runtime procedure; don't duplicate the table here — it goes stale. ## Constraints - Never load all agents upfront; load only the primary agent for each phase. - Keep total context below **40%** of the model's window at all times. - Load agents on demand when their phase begins, not speculatively. - Use tool-based file reads (Read); do not paste file contents into the prompt. ## Enforcement No hook blocks or warns on capability loads any more (the former context ceiling hook was removed; see [ADR 0043](../../../../docs/adr/0043-replace-the-context-ceiling-guard-with-harness-autocompact.md)). The harness compacts the conversation itself at the percentage `/dev-team:setup` writes to the repo's `.claude/settings.json` (`CLAUDE_AUTOCOMPACT_PCT_OVERRIDE`, default 40). Repos that never ran `/setup` keep the harness default, which is much later, and get a one-line advisory at session start. After a compaction, a `compact` SessionStart hook re-injects the active `/build` phase, step and plan progress. So the budget estimate below is the planning tool you apply *before* loading, and `/handoff` is yours to run by hand when a deliberate, structured summary is worth more than a generic compaction. ### Why 40% The 40% default is a conservative planning target, not a claimed accuracy cliff. Chroma's [Context Rot study](https://www.trychroma.com/research/context-rot) found degradation across 18 models (including Claude 4) is gradual, not a sharp drop at any single percentage. Needle-in-a-haystack benchmarks like RULER and NoLiMa show a model's *effective* context is often only about half its advertised window, with sharp accuracy drops on non-lexical retrieval well before the window limit. Anthropic's [effective context engineering guidance](https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/effective-context-engineering-for-ai-agents) recommends proactive compaction well ahead of the limit. Given that evidence, budgeting to 40% of the window leaves headroom before quality degrades, rather than chasing a precise threshold that doesn't exist. There is no absolute token cap: the percentage applies to the window, so 40% of a 1M window is 400K. Full guide — how the threshold is configured, the two SessionStart hooks, troubleshooting: [Context Management](../../docs/context-management.md). ## Loading Decision Procedure ### Step 0: Confirm there is a task Before loading anything or reading files, confirm an actionable instruction exists. If the user has not yet said what they want, wait — do not speculatively read files, verify code, or load agents. Premature investigation before a task is given wastes context and is a common interrupt trigger. Once a task exists, proceed to Step 1. ### Step 1: Classify the task | Profile | Description | Example | |---|---|---| | **Simple/Single** | One agent, no skills | "Fix this typo", "Write a unit test" | | **Standard/Single** | One agent + 1–2 skills | "Implement this feature using hexagonal architecture" | | **Multi-Agent** | 2–3 agents coordinating | "Design and implement a new API endpoint" | | **Complex/Multi** | 3+ agents + skills | "Build a new bounded context with full test coverage" | ### Step 2: Select agents Load the **minimum set**: 1. Identify the **primary agent** (owns the deliverable). 2. Identify **supporting agents** (input or review). 3. Do NOT load agents for downstream validation yet — load them when their phase begins. Order: primary first, then supporting agents one at a time as their phase begins. ### Step 3: Select skills For each loaded agent, check its `## Skills` section: - Only load skills **relevant to the current task** — not all skills the agent references. - Skills shared by multiple loaded agents only need to be loaded once. ### Step 4: Calculate token budget ``` Total = CLAUDE.md baseline + conversation history (estimate) + agent files (sum selected) + skill files (sum selected) + expected output (estimate) ``` **Target: total < 40% of the model's context window.** For Claude with a 200K window, that's < 80K tokens; on a 1M-window model it is 400K (there is no absolute cap). See [Why 40%](#why-40) for the rationale. The config files are a small fraction; the real budget concern is conversation history + output accumulation over multi-turn tasks. ### Step 5: Load via tool-based file reads ``` Read agents/software-engineer.md Read skills/hexagonal-architecture/SKILL.md ``` Do NOT copy file contents into the system prompt or conversation. ## Loading Profiles Pre-computed loading sets for common task types. ### Code Implementation - **Load**: Software Engineer + relevant skill(s) - **Defer**: QA (load after implementation), Architect (load only if design questions arise) ### Architecture Design - **Load**: Architect + relevant architecture skill(s) - **Defer**: Software Engineer (load at implementation), QA (load at validation) ### Bug Fix - **Load**: Software Engineer only - **Defer**: QA (load if regression test needed) ### New Feature (full lifecycle) Three phases, each in a fresh context window with a human review gate between. Each phase's output is a structured progress file in `.claude/memory/` that onboards the next phase. | Phase | Load | Purpose | Output | |---|---|---|---| | 1. Research | Orchestrator + sub-agents (exploration) | Understand system, find files, trace data flows | Research progress file | | 2. Plan | Architect + PM (if needed) + relevant skill(s) | Specify every change: files, snippets, tests | Implementation plan progress file | | 3. Implement | Software Engineer + QA + skill(s) | Execute the plan; code, tests | Working code + test results | Key rules: - Each phase starts with a fresh context window, loading only the previous phase's progress file. - Human reviews and approves the progress file before the next phase begins. - Sub-agents primarily provide context isolation — they search, read, and return concise findings. - If implementation is large, compact mid-phase: update the plan progress file with completed steps and continue in a fresh context. ## Unloading Since tokens can't be literally removed from context: 1. **Phase transitions** — summarize completed phase output into `.claude/memory/` and start a new conversation for the next phase. 2. **Within a conversation** — stop referencing the agent/skill; the orchestrator mentally notes it's no longer active. Use the Handoff skill (continue mode) to compress stale content. 3. **Multi-turn accumulation** — when conversation history crosses **30%** utilization, trigger summarization before loading additional agents. ## Anti-patterns - Loading all agents upfront — wastes tokens before any work begins. Load only the primary agent. - Loading all of an agent's skills — most are irrelevant to the specific request. - Never unloading — context grows monotonically until hallucination risk. Summarize and phase-transition. - Loading agents "just in case" — adds cost without value. Load on demand when the phase begins. ## Output Loading plan as one table: selected agents + skills, token costs, estimated total, and utilization percentage against the 40% ceiling. No narration.
GitHub에서 보기