Menu
Skills in this repository
SkillsMP has collected 3,969 skills from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Open a skill to review its source and details.
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsShowing 40 of 3,969 collected skills.
Use when turning results into an explicit contribution for a Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS) manuscript — an advance to an IS-management/economics conversation with theoretical and managerial implications. Frames the contribution and aligns…
Use when staking a Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS) manuscript's contribution against the IS literature and the basket siblings — showing it advances an IS-management/economics conversation rather than only a reference discipline. Positions…
Use when planning and drafting the response to a Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS) major/minor revision — a point-by-point reply to the EIC, Associate Editor, and double-anonymized referees that resolves identification, measurement,…
Use when calibrating expectations for the Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS) editorial process — the EIC-led, email-intake, double-anonymized review by Associate Editors and expert referees, likely decision types, and timing. Sets expectations…
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS) manuscript — the email-to-EIC intake, full anonymization for double-blind review, the ≤50-page and 150-word-abstract limits, the numbered bracketed…
Use when deciding whether a question is the right shape for a Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS) manuscript — an IS-management or economics-of-IS problem, not a generic tech study or a pure CS contribution. Pressure-tests fit and outlet choice…
Use when the prose is the bottleneck for a Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS) manuscript — an abstract and introduction that land the IS-management contribution, and a body that reads for a method-literate but management-minded IS audience.…
Use when building the theoretical engine of a Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS) manuscript — an IT-business-value logic, a platform/network-effects mechanism, an economic model of IS, or a technology-specific behavioral theory. Adapts the form…
Use when building the conceptual framework and mechanism for a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) manuscript — deriving hypotheses from marketing theory, specifying mediators and boundary conditions, and carrying the logic through to a…
Use when planning a revision and drafting the point-by-point response letter for a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) R&R — prioritizing the editor's decisive concerns, strengthening both the theoretical and managerial contribution, and…
Use when staking a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) manuscript's contribution against the marketing literature — locating it in the right stream, defending against "incremental / new-context," and citing the substantive canon the editor and…
Use when sharpening the headline claim of an Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) manuscript into a contribution to entrepreneurship theory AND practice.
Use when drafting the response to an Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) R&R — building a point-by-point response letter that honors the developmental, double-anonymized review and re-secures the theory-and-practice contribution.
Use when deciding whether a question is entrepreneurship-central enough for an Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) manuscript, and whether ETP (vs.
Use when deciding which jams-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from question to rebuttal for a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
Use when shaping the prose, abstract, and introduction of a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) manuscript so the dual theory-and-managerial contribution lands in the journal's voice. Polishes exposition; it does not state the contribution…
Use when staking the contribution of an Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) manuscript against the entrepreneurship frontier and its sibling journals (JBV, SEJ, AMJ, Research Policy).
Use when calibrating expectations for the Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) review cycle — desk-reject odds, the developmental double-anonymized review, R&R norms, and revision choreography.
Use when building the theoretical argument for an Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) manuscript — constructing an explicitly entrepreneurial mechanism (opportunity, effectuation, bricolage, identity, socioemotional wealth) and choosing the theorizing…
Use when deciding which etp-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for an Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) submission.
Use when the prose, abstract, or introduction of an Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) manuscript does not land the journal's theory-and-practice voice.
Use when choosing or sharpening the research question for a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) manuscript — confirming it is a broad, managerially consequential marketing-science question and routing it away from sibling marketing journals.…
Use when polishing full-manuscript prose and narrative craft on a Human Relations (HR) manuscript — the reflexive, theoretically-engaged HR voice, intro/abstract, and structure within the 13k cap. Polishes the writing; it does not change the theory or…
Use when stating the contribution of a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) manuscript — discharging JAMS's dual mandate of a theoretical AND a managerial contribution and defending against "incremental." Frames the contribution; it does not run…
Use when turning results or a theory into an explicit contribution for the Journal of Business Venturing (JBV) — stating what new theory of the entrepreneurial phenomenon the paper delivers, its boundary conditions, and its multidisciplinary reach. Frames the…
Use when positioning a Journal of Business Venturing (JBV) manuscript in the entrepreneurship literature — joining a live conversation, problematizing assumptions instead of gap-spotting, and engaging across economics, psychology, and sociology. Positions the…
Use after a Journal of Business Venturing (JBV) R&R to plan revisions and draft the point-by-point response letter — prioritizing the handling editor's concerns, defending or strengthening the entrepreneurship contribution, and addressing…
Use when understanding how the Journal of Business Venturing (JBV) review process works — Co-EIC / area-editor routing, double-anonymized review by a minimum of two reviewers, desk-reject risk for off-phenomenon work, and reading a JBV decision letter.…
Use when preparing to submit a Journal of Business Venturing (JBV) manuscript through Elsevier Editorial Manager — double-anonymized preparation, required declarations (competing interest, CRediT, generative-AI when used), flexible first-submission…
Use when building the theoretical argument for a Journal of Business Venturing (JBV) manuscript — constructing a multidisciplinary mechanism (economics, psychology, sociology) for an entrepreneurial phenomenon, and choosing between hypothesis-testing and…
Use when shaping or stress-testing a research question for the Journal of Business Venturing (JBV) — confirming the entrepreneurial phenomenon is central, picking a multidisciplinary lens, and checking fit before investing in theory or data. Defines the…
Use when deciding which jbv-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Journal of Business Venturing (JBV) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
Use when polishing the prose of a Journal of Business Venturing (JBV) manuscript — front-loading the entrepreneurial phenomenon, writing for a multidisciplinary audience, honoring JBV's openness to narrative/interpretive voice, and applying Elsevier reference…
Use to write or stress-test the institutional-background section of a 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research) manuscript — stating China's financial-system detail accurately (regulatory rules, market segmentation, ownership), since wrong regulatory caliber or…
Source text: Chinese
Use to understand how Management Science (INFORMS) review and decisions work — the Department/area-editor desk screen, double-anonymized refereeing, the cross-department fit bar, official turnaround targets, and how to read a decision letter — before or after…
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for a Management Science (INFORMS) manuscript — ScholarOne seven-step upload, double-anonymization, author-year house style, the $79 submission fee and waivers, the Data and Code Disclosure package and…
Use when shaping or stress-testing a research question for Management Science (INFORMS) — confirming the decision-relevance bar, choosing the right Department lane (analytical vs empirical), and testing fit against sister INFORMS journals (Operations…
Use when deciding which mgsci-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for a Management Science (INFORMS) manuscript. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills, and helps pick the right…
Use when polishing the prose of a Management Science (INFORMS) manuscript — front-loading the result, keeping notation lean, writing for a cross-department reader, and conforming to author-year citation house style and the journal's preference for short,…
Use when articulating the contribution of a Mathematical Finance (Wiley) manuscript — frame the methodological novelty and its payoff for financial modelling (pricing, hedging, risk, portfolio, microstructure) so editor and referees see why the theorem…