Menu
Skills in this repository
SkillsMP has collected 3,969 skills from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Open a skill to review its source and details.
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsShowing 40 of 3,969 collected skills.
Use when a 《中国农村经济》 manuscript is at the topic-selection stage and the 三农 scope fit, theoretical grounding, marginal-contribution sentences, or venue match are unsettled. Produces the contribution-sentence template and the 三农-fit checklist.…
Source text: Chinese
Use when designing or writing the governance / policy-process mechanism analysis for a 《中国行政管理》 manuscript. Identifies how an effect is produced (implementation, attention allocation, central-local, incentives / accountability) via quantitative mediation or…
Source text: Chinese
Use when drafting or strengthening the policy-implications section of a 《中国行政管理》 manuscript. Frames implications as actionable for government practice but firmly grounded in the paper's own analysis — not the empty four-verb filler. 本技能服务于《中国行政管理》(Chinese…
Source text: Chinese
Use when responding to reviewer reports for a 《中国行政管理》 revision. Produces the point-by-point response letter and aligned manuscript edits, with special attention to theory-frame and method-fit comments common at PA journals. 本技能服务于《中国行政管理》(Chinese Public…
Source text: Chinese
Use when polishing the language and rhetoric of a 《中国行政管理》 manuscript — eliminating the four-verb policy filler, anchoring claims in the PA theory frame, replacing narrative-only case writing with evidence-linked argument, and aligning person / hedging with…
Source text: Chinese
Use when drafting or revising the 中文内容提要 (~300 字, official) or English 梗概/Summary for an 《经济研究》 manuscript. Enforces the five-sentence Chinese pattern, the five-element English Summary, and forbids empty-significance phrases. 本技能服务于《经济研究》(Economic Research…
Source text: Chinese
Use when drafting or revising the 引言 (introduction) of an 《经济研究》 manuscript — when the opening starts from a remote macro backdrop, when contributions read like "丰富了相关研究", or when the introduction fails to spoil the core finding. 本技能服务于《经济研究》(Economic…
Source text: Chinese
Use when writing the explicit contribution statement for a Management Science (INFORMS) manuscript — turning an analytical result or empirical finding into a decision-relevant insight that travels across departments, and showing why it belongs in Management…
Use when evaluating the model and analyzing results for an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript so it survives expert systems review — independent model evaluation (observed vs. simulated, fit statistics), sensitivity and uncertainty analysis, and trade-off…
Use when building figures and tables for an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript so exhibits communicate interactions, dynamics, trade-offs, and model performance clearly. AgSy is a systems journal, so the best exhibits show trade-off frontiers,…
Use when articulating why an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) result matters — its relevance for farm design, management, decision support, or policy. AgSy values systems analysis that informs a decision, so this is what separates an AgSy paper from a methods…
Use when positioning an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript against the literature so it reads as a systems contribution. AgSy readers span agronomy, modelling, livestock, economics, environment, and food-system science, so the paper must engage the…
Use when writing the response to an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) revision decision. AgSy review is single anonymized with at least two expert systems reviewers and an editor decision, and revisions often turn on model evaluation, sensitivity/uncertainty, and…
Use when framing the system and describing the model for an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript — defining system boundaries, components, hierarchical levels, and feedbacks, then choosing, describing, and calibrating the model (process/simulation,…
Use when positioning an American Journal of Sociology (AJS) manuscript within the literature so it reads as in dialogue with current sociology. AJS reviewers are assigned by readers who locate the paper's substantive area and method, and the journal prizes…
Use when building the theoretical argument of an American Journal of Sociology (AJS) manuscript into a portable, discipline-level contribution. AJS prizes theoretical ambition above a bare finding — explicit concepts, mechanisms, and scope conditions, in the…
Use to frame the central result of an Econometric Theory (ET) paper so its generality and importance are legible — stating the theorem and its scope up front, choosing Article vs Miscellanea framing, and matching the new editorial program's themed directions.
Use for the Monte Carlo and numerical-illustration component of an Econometric Theory (ET) paper — designing simulations that show finite-sample behavior tracks the asymptotics, plus any illustrative empirical example. Lighter than empirical journals; the…
Use when the assumptions, regularity conditions, and asymptotic results are the bottleneck for an Econometric Theory (ET) theorem-proof paper — adapt "identification" to mean stating defensible assumptions, proving the limit theory, and establishing…
Use to stake an Econometric Theory (ET) contribution against the existing theory frontier — which assumptions you weaken, which limit result you generalize, what was previously unproven — using APA author-date citations, not a standalone literature survey.
Use when an Econometric Theory (ET) decision letter arrives and a response strategy and letter are needed — handling proof-checking referee objections, fixing assumptions and gaps, and using the online Supplement, then writing a point-by-point response. It…
Use to handle reproducibility and the supplementary-material file for an Econometric Theory (ET) paper — ET has no mandatory data/code archive (theory journal); the relevant policy is the voluntary online Supplementary Material for already-reviewed proofs,…
Use to understand and prepare for the Econometric Theory (ET) review process — single-anonymous refereeing (reviewers see the author), the Article/Miscellanea/ET-Interview article types, and war-gaming the proof-checking referee before submitting.
Use when deciding whether a result is the right kind of contribution for Econometric Theory (ET) — a general, foundational econometric-theory result (asymptotics, proofs, theorems) rather than an applied estimate, and whether it fits a full Article or a short…
Use as the router for an Econometric Theory (ET) manuscript — decides which ectheory-* skill to invoke next across the theorem-proof lifecycle, from topic selection through single-anonymous review and rebuttal. Start here when unsure where you are.
Use when designing or defending the field-experiment or modelling design of a Field Crops Research (FCR) manuscript — multi-environment trials, randomization and replication, blocking and split-plot layouts, genotype-by-environment (G×E) structure, and…
Use when positioning a Field Crops Research (FCR) manuscript against the agronomy and crop-science literature so it reads as a general contribution to field-crop science, not a local report. FCR requires new scientific insight of general relevance and rejects…
Use when writing the response to a Field Crops Research (FCR) revision decision (major or minor) and revising the manuscript. FCR reviewers commonly press on scope/generality, statistics and G×E, reproducibility detail, and a discussion that interprets rather…
Use when deciding whether an agronomy or crop-science project fits Field Crops Research (FCR) and which article type to target. FCR's defining test is field-based agronomic significance with multi-season/-environment relevance — it rejects…
Use as the entry point for any Field Crops Research (FCR) manuscript. Routes to the right FCR sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and which article type (Original Research Paper, Review, Short Communication, Opinion, Loomis Review) fits. It…
Use when sharpening the development-economics takeaway of a Journal of Development Economics (JDE) manuscript — the explicit "what this teaches about development" claim that an editor and referees can restate in one sentence. Frames the contribution; it is…
Use when staking a manuscript's contribution against the development-economics literature for the Journal of Development Economics (JDE). Positions the paper at the frontier; it does not write a standalone survey.
Use when assembling the data and code deposit for a Journal of Development Economics (JDE) submission or accepted paper — JDE's mandatory replication policy, Mendeley Data hosting, and the fact that data/code can be requested at the review stage. Builds the…
Use when judging whether a research question fits the Journal of Development Economics (JDE) — a first-order question about low- and middle-income economies and the process of economic development. Tests topic fit before identification or drafting begins.
Use to frame the contribution of a Journal of International Economics (JIE) manuscript so it clears the journal's gate that work be original in its motivation or modelling structure — articulating what is new for international trade or international…
Use to position a Journal of International Economics (JIE) manuscript against the international-trade or open-economy-macro frontier — staking the contribution against gravity/structural-trade or international-finance literatures without writing a standalone…
Use when drafting the response letter for a revise-and-resubmit at the Journal of International Economics (JIE) — answering international-trade or open-economy-macro referees on gravity/structural specification, identification, and model discipline, and…
Use when checking whether a paper fits the Journal of International Economics (JIE) scope and clears its originality gate — trade patterns and commercial policy, exchange rates, open-economy macro, international finance, sovereign debt, factor mobility,…
Use when positioning a Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JPSP) manuscript against the literatures its section's readers expect, building the long-format introduction and literature review that precede the multi-study package. Sharpens the gap and…
Use when meeting the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JPSP) transparency requirements — TOP Guidelines at Level 2, JARS reporting, data/code/materials disclosure to a trusted repository, preregistration status, and Registered Reports. Guides…