| name | when-to-become-studio |
| version | 1.1.0 |
| description | Helps a serial entrepreneur decide whether to formalize their multi-venture operation into a Services Hub or a formal Venture Studio. Evaluates 3 operating modes (not binary): serial entrepreneur puro / services hub operator / formal studio with fund. Use when the user asks "when to become a studio", "serial entrepreneur vs studio", "systematize multi-venture", "formalize studio", "services hub readiness", "venture studio readiness", "/when-to-become-studio".
|
When to Become a Studio (3 operating modes)
Ayuda a un serial entrepreneur a decidir qué nivel de formalización necesita su
operación multi-venture. No es decisión binary — son 3 modos distintos según signals.
Regla de idioma
Español.
Directorio de salida
./portfolio/{founder-name}/
└── studio-readiness-assessment.md
Los 3 modos (middle ground introducido en v1.1)
Modo 1 — Serial entrepreneur puro
Quién es: persona con múltiples ventures personales sin methodology formal. Cada
venture es "suya", ad-hoc process de launching, no shared infrastructure formal.
Structure típica: Multi-LLCs independientes (ver structure-decision patrones 1-5).
Sin Services LLC central.
Ejemplo: founder con 2-3 startups, cada una en su propia LLC, operating independent.
Sin MSAs entre entidades. Shared services = "yo trabajo en los 3 personalmente".
Modo 2 — Services Hub operator (NUEVO en v1.1)
Quién es: serial entrepreneur con methodology repetible + shared services formales
entre N ventures. Uses Services LLC central + bilateral MSAs. VC raises independent per
venture, sin plan de fund atado.
Structure: structure-decision patrón #6 (Services Hub + Independent Ventures) +
services-hub-setup skill para MSAs + transfer pricing.
Ejemplo: caso @lapc506 — 4 ventures personales (Altrupets, Vertivolatam, Habitanexus,
Aduanext) + LAPC506 Services LLC proveyendo shared dev/design/marketing/legal con MSA
bilateral per venture.
Modo 3 — Formal venture studio con fund
Quién es: studio operator con track record cuantificable + plan de levantar LP
capital via fund atado. Management Co + GP entity + Fund LP stack completo.
Structure: structure-decision patrón #7 (Multi-LLC + Holding) + attached-fund-structure
skill para Management Co + GP + LP layered.
Ejemplo: studio con 2+ exits previos + plan de raise $5M LP fund para invertir en
~15 ventures nuevas.
Serial entrepreneur vs. venture studio vs. services hub (diferencias clave)
Serial entrepreneur puro: persona con múltiples ventures personales. Cada venture es
"suya". Ad-hoc process de launching. No hay "systematic method".
Services Hub operator: persona con múltiples ventures + methodology repetible +
Services LLC central proveyendo shared services via MSAs. NO LP fund.
Venture studio formal: organización con systematic approach a creating ventures.
Metodología repetible, team dedicated, clear thesis, shared services, plus LP fund
atado. Ventures son "del studio" (al menos parcialmente).
Signals que indicás estás listo para transitarlo
Marcar (✓ por cada signal positivo):
Decisión (updated v1.1 — 3 modes):
| Score | Recomendación | Siguiente skill |
|---|
| 0-4 ✓ | Modo 1 — Serial entrepreneur puro | Multi-LLCs via structure-decision (patrones 1-5). No formalizar más allá. |
| 5-7 ✓ | Modo 2 — Services Hub operator (NUEVO) | services-hub-setup skill + structure-decision patrón #6 |
| 8-9 ✓ + plan fund atado | Modo 3 — Formal venture studio con fund | attached-fund-structure skill + structure-decision patrón #7 |
Reglas adicionales para routing correcto
- Si score 5-7 pero con plan fund atado → probablemente premature, validar que el
fund atado es real (LP conversations iniciadas, NO solo aspiracional). Si no es real →
stay en Services Hub hasta que track record + LP interest justifiquen fund.
- Si score 8-9 pero SIN plan fund atado → NO necesitás formal studio con Holding.
Stay en Services Hub. Holding + Management Co overhead sin LP fund es waste.
- Legacy interpretation (v1.0): "7-9 ✓ = listo para studio" era simplification binaria.
En v1.1 differentiamos: la mayoría de "ready" are really Services Hub readiness (Modo 2),
no formal studio con fund (Modo 3 requires fund-plan gate).
Transiciones por modo
Los pasos de formalización dependen del modo destino. NO son genéricos — Modo 2 (Services Hub) y Modo 3 (Formal studio con fund) requieren infraestructura legal y operativa muy distinta.
Transición hacia Modo 2 — Services Hub operator
Aplica si el scoring fue 5-7 ✓, o 8-9 ✓ sin plan fund atado real.
Paso 1: Legal formalization
- Ver skill
structure-decision patrón #6 (Services Hub + Independent Ventures)
- Typically: 1 Services LLC central + N Venture LLCs independientes (una por venture)
- NO holding, NO Management Co, NO fund entities — la Services LLC es un vendor,
no un shareholder
Paso 2: MSA + transfer pricing
- Ver skill
services-hub-setup para:
- MSA template bilateral (Services LLC ↔ cada Venture LLC)
- SOW templates por service type
- Transfer pricing cost-plus (5-10% markup típico)
- IP assignment rider (crítico para evitar IP contamination)
Paso 3: Methodology (repetible sin fund)
- Documentar steps que seguís para launch cada venture
- Ideation, validation, team formation, launch, scale-or-kill
- El toolkit completo (
business-model-toolkit, ux-research-toolkit,
venture-studio-toolkit) es la base metodológica
Paso 4: Shared services operations
- Ver skill
shared-services-ledger variant Services Hub
- Bilateral MSAs, NO consolidated reporting
- Time tracking + billing per venture
Paso 5: Governance (light)
- Portfolio review cadence — periodic ventures check-in
- NO quarterly LP reporting (no hay LP)
- Decision framework para kill/scale per venture independiente
Transición hacia Modo 3 — Formal venture studio con fund
Aplica solo si el scoring fue 8-9 ✓ Y hay plan fund atado real (LP conversations iniciadas).
Paso 1: Legal formalization
- Ver skill
structure-decision patrón #7 (Multi-LLC + Holding)
- Stack: Holding Co (parent) + Management Co + GP entity + Fund LP + N Venture Subsidiaries
- Management Co provee services; Holding owns equity en ventures
Paso 2: Fund structure
- Ver skill
attached-fund-structure para:
- Management Co + GP entity setup
- Fund LP formation (Delaware LP más común, o Cayman para LATAM LPs)
- LP subscription docs + PPM (Private Placement Memorandum)
- Management fee (2% típico) + carry (20% típico)
Paso 3: LP-facing materials
- Ver skills
studio-thesis (37-word thesis), studio-focus (Stage × Geography × Industry),
secret-sauce (6-metric ranking)
- Required para LP fundraising + credibility
Paso 4: Methodology + systematic approach
- Misma base metodológica que Modo 2, pero escalada
- Track record quantificable para LP reporting
Paso 5: Shared services operations
- Ver skill
shared-services-ledger variant Full Studio
- Centralized via holding, consolidated financial statements
- Transfer pricing evaluated at Holding level (often needs big 4 review)
Paso 6: Governance (heavy)
- Quarterly LP reporting (mandatory for fund compliance)
- Portfolio reviews con
three-horizons, innovation-scorecard
- Kill/scale decisions con
cost-of-delay-cd3, improvement-kata
- Annual audit (often required by LP subscription docs)
Flujo del skill
Paso 1 — Assessment
WS-1: "Vamos a evaluar tu readiness. Responder honestly each signal (9 preguntas)."
Presentar las 9 señales una a una. Track scores.
Paso 2 — Verdict (3-mode routing)
WS-2: Basado en scores Y fund plan, enrutar al modo correcto:
-
0-4 ✓ → Modo 1 — Serial entrepreneur puro: "Quedate como serial entrepreneur con Multi-LLCs (patrones 1-5 de structure-decision). No necesitás más formalización por ahora. Re-evaluar en 6-12 meses."
-
5-7 ✓ (con o sin plan fund) → Modo 2 — Services Hub operator (NUEVO en v1.1): "Formalizá como Services Hub. Usar structure-decision patrón #6 + skill services-hub-setup para setup de MSAs + transfer pricing."
-
8-9 ✓ + plan fund atado REAL (LP conversations iniciadas, NO solo aspiracional) → Modo 3 — Formal venture studio con fund: "Formalizá como studio completo. Usar structure-decision patrón #7 + skill attached-fund-structure para Management Co + GP + LP stack."
-
8-9 ✓ SIN plan fund atado real → Modo 2 — Services Hub operator: "Tenés el readiness score pero sin fund plan, NO necesitás Holding overhead. Usá Services Hub. Re-evaluar a Mode 3 cuando haya LP conversations iniciadas."
Paso 3 — Roadmap (si Mode 2 o Mode 3)
WS-3: Generar roadmap de transición según el modo:
Si Mode 2 (Services Hub):
structure-decision patrón #6 (Services Hub + Independent Ventures)services-hub-setup para MSA template + transfer pricingshared-services-ledger variant Services Hub
Si Mode 3 (Formal studio con fund):
structure-decision patrón #7 (Multi-LLC + Holding)attached-fund-structure para Management Co + GP + LPstudio-thesis + studio-focus + secret-sauce para LP-facing materialsshared-services-ledger variant Full Studio
Paso 4 — Close-gaps plan (si Mode 1)
WS-4: Si 0-4 ✓, generar plan para cerrar gaps específicos hacia Mode 2. Re-evaluar en timeline realista (6-12 meses).
Output
# Studio Readiness Assessment — [Founder Name]
## Assessment date: YYYY-MM-DD
## Signals
| Signal | Status |
|---|---|
| 3+ ventures activas | ✓/✗ |
| Methodology repetible | ✓/✗ |
| Team más allá de vos | ✓/✗ |
| Shared infrastructure | ✓/✗ |
| Time investment >60% | ✓/✗ |
| Pipeline activo | ✓/✗ |
| Track record mínimo | ✓/✗ |
| Vision amplia | ✓/✗ |
| Recursos para formalizar | ✓/✗ |
**Score**: X/9
## Verdict
**Modo recomendado: [Modo 1 — Serial entrepreneur puro / Modo 2 — Services Hub operator / Modo 3 — Formal venture studio con fund]**
Rationale:
- Score: X/9
- Fund plan atado (real, con LP conversations iniciadas): [Yes / No / N/A]
- Routing aplicado: [0-4 → Modo 1 / 5-7 → Modo 2 / 8-9 + fund plan real → Modo 3 / 8-9 sin fund plan → Modo 2]
## [Si Modo 2 o Modo 3] Transition roadmap
Seguir el roadmap específico del modo:
### Si Modo 2 — Services Hub operator:
- `structure-decision` patrón #6 (Services Hub + Independent Ventures)
- `services-hub-setup` para MSA template + transfer pricing + IP assignment rider
- `shared-services-ledger` variant Services Hub (bilateral MSAs, NO holding)
### Si Modo 3 — Formal venture studio con fund:
- `structure-decision` patrón #7 (Multi-LLC + Holding)
- `attached-fund-structure` para Management Co + GP + Fund LP stack
- `studio-thesis` + `studio-focus` + `secret-sauce` para LP-facing materials
- `shared-services-ledger` variant Full Studio (centralized via holding)
[Steps específicos con deadlines]
## [Si Modo 1] Gaps to close hacia Modo 2
1. [Gap]: [plan + timeline]
2. [Gap]: [plan + timeline]
**Re-assessment date**: [date realista, 6-12 meses]
## Notes
[Observations particulares sobre tu caso — incluyendo si el fund plan es aspiracional vs real, si hay edge cases del routing, etc.]
Principios clave
- Studio formalization requires critical mass: <3 ventures = premature
- Methodology repetible es el key signal: si cada venture se lanza ad-hoc, no es studio
- Shared services > shared vibes: infrastructure shared concretely
- Time investment >60%: studio is a full-time endeavor, not side hustle
- Re-assess annually: readiness changes
Anti-patterns
- Calling yourself "studio" con 1 venture → marketing sin substance
- Formalizar demasiado temprano → overhead kills velocity
- Never formalizar aunque ready → miss benefits (LP credibility, shared services efficiency)
Integración con otras skills
structure-decision: si ready, estructura legal del studiostudio-thesis: si ready, thesis articulationliability-contagion-analysis: informa if single-LLC viable durante transición- Toolkit completo: studio formalization = adopting methodology del toolkit
Recursos
- GSSN (Global Startup Studio Network) — community of formal studios
- Govclab — How to build a venture studio
- Serial Entrepreneur Mindset — research sobre founders who've done this transition
