| name | paperlab_multireviewer_simulation |
| description | Run a simulated multi-reviewer critique of PaperLab manuscripts and books,
covering novelty, methods, evidence, reproducibility, figures, and journal fit.
|
PaperLab Multi-Reviewer Simulation
When to Use
USE WHEN: preparing a manuscript, revision, or book release for serious external
review.
Reviewer Roles
- handling editor,
- thermodynamics or process-simulation expert,
- numerical methods reviewer,
- reproducibility reviewer,
- application/domain reviewer,
- figure and table reviewer.
Rubric
Score 1 to 5 for:
- novelty,
- evidence strength,
- method clarity,
- statistical validity,
- reproducibility,
- limitations disclosure,
- figure narrative,
- journal or publisher fit.
Output Pattern
## Reviewer 2: Numerical Methods
Major comments:
- ...
Minor comments:
- ...
Decision tendency: major revision
Pass Criteria
- All blocker comments map to fixable evidence or prose actions.
- Editorial risk is explicit.
- The recommended decision is justified by the manuscript, not by taste alone.
Safety Rules
- Do not fabricate external peer-review outcomes.
- Keep review comments anchored to manuscript sections and artifacts.
- Separate required fixes from optional polish.
