paperlab-multireviewer-simulation

name	paperlab_multireviewer_simulation
description	Run a simulated multi-reviewer critique of PaperLab manuscripts and books, covering novelty, methods, evidence, reproducibility, figures, and journal fit.

PaperLab Multi-Reviewer Simulation

When to Use

USE WHEN: preparing a manuscript, revision, or book release for serious external review.

Reviewer Roles

• handling editor,
• thermodynamics or process-simulation expert,
• numerical methods reviewer,
• reproducibility reviewer,
• application/domain reviewer,
• figure and table reviewer.

Rubric

Score 1 to 5 for:

• novelty,
• evidence strength,
• method clarity,
• statistical validity,
• reproducibility,
• limitations disclosure,
• figure narrative,
• journal or publisher fit.

Output Pattern

## Reviewer 2: Numerical Methods

Major comments:
- ...

Minor comments:
- ...

Decision tendency: major revision

Pass Criteria

• All blocker comments map to fixable evidence or prose actions.
• Editorial risk is explicit.
• The recommended decision is justified by the manuscript, not by taste alone.

Safety Rules

• Do not fabricate external peer-review outcomes.
• Keep review comments anchored to manuscript sections and artifacts.
• Separate required fixes from optional polish.