with one click
gen-release-notes
generate release notes for changes since a given tag
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Menu
generate release notes for changes since a given tag
Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.
Based on SOC occupation classification
Use when you need a bite-sized, TDD-driven implementation plan but do NOT have a brainstorm-beagle spec to plan against. quick-plan reconstructs intent from the current conversation, fans out domain-expert exploration subagents across the codebase, and synthesizes the same plan format write-plan produces — without requiring `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md`. Triggers on: "quick plan", "plan this out", "plan what we just discussed", "turn this into an implementation plan", "plan this without a spec", "I don't have a spec, just plan it", "write-plan but no spec". Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants an implementation or TDD plan and there is no spec to plan against — even if they just say "plan it" after discussing a feature. Writes to `.beagle/plans/<slug>/plan.md`. If a finalized spec already exists at `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md`, prefer write-plan. Does NOT brainstorm specs, write code, or execute the plan — produces the plan document (and an optional handoff prompt) only.
Use when the user has a fuzzy idea and wants to shape it into a concrete project spec before planning or building. Triggers on: "brainstorm this", "I have an idea for...", "help me think through this project", "what should I build", "spec this out". Also catches vague feature descriptions needing structured questioning to clarify scope. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, review strategy docs, or run strategy interviews — produces a WHAT/WHY spec through dialogue, not a HOW plan.
Use as the follow-up to brainstorm-beagle when a spec has an Open Questions section (or quietly carries latent gaps) that need closing before planning or implementation can begin. Triggers on: "resolve the open questions", "close the gaps in this spec", "research the open items", "finalize my spec", "make this spec implementation-ready", "answer the TBDs". Also triggers whenever the user points at a brainstorm-beagle spec and asks for research, proposals, or answers to unresolved items. Orchestrates parallel research subagents when available (falls back to inline sequential research otherwise), proposes answers one at a time for user approval, then rewrites the spec in place so it arrives at planning with no known gaps. Does NOT write code, design implementation, or create plans — it only produces a complete spec.
Use when you have a finalized brainstorm-beagle spec at `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md` and need a bite-sized, TDD-driven implementation plan before any code is written. Triggers on: "write a plan", "plan this spec", "turn the spec into a plan", "now plan the implementation", "write-plan". Reads the spec, designs the file structure, decomposes work into 2-5 minute TDD steps with exact paths and commands, self-reviews against the spec, gets user approval, then writes to `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/plan.md` and offers to generate an execution handoff prompt via the subagent-prompt skill. Does NOT brainstorm specs, write code, or execute the plan — produces the plan document (and an optional handoff prompt) only.
Core technical documentation writing principles for voice, tone, structure, and LLM-friendly patterns. Use when writing or reviewing any documentation.
Generate first-draft technical documentation from code analysis
| name | gen-release-notes |
| description | generate release notes for changes since a given tag |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Generate professional release notes following the Keep a Changelog standard.
Input: Previous tag (e.g., v0.0.1)
$ARGUMENTS
Analyze the changes thoroughly before generating release notes.
Do not invent tags, PR numbers, or links. Each row must pass before the work that depends on it.
| When | Pass condition (evidence) | On fail |
|---|---|---|
Before git log / git diff | git tag -l "$PREV_TAG" prints exactly one line matching PREV_TAG | Stop; report that the tag is missing—do not write changelog entries |
| Before categorizing | git rev-parse "$PREV_TAG^{commit}" exits 0 | Stop; fix PREV_TAG or repo checkout |
If using gh pr list | Command exits 0 and JSON is valid | Fall back to commit subjects + merge-commit URLs only; do not fabricate PR numbers |
| After Step 5 footer edits | Step 6 footer-gate exits 0 (both grep -q checks pass against the staged CHANGELOG.md) | Re-run footer edits from Step 5, then re-run Step 6 until it exits 0 |
Run these commands to collect information about changes since the provided tag:
# Store the previous tag
PREV_TAG="$ARGUMENTS"
# Gate: tag must exist (output must be non-empty and match PREV_TAG)
git tag -l "$PREV_TAG"
# If the line above prints nothing, STOP — do not continue below.
# Get the repo URL for PR links
git remote get-url origin
# List commits since last tag
git log ${PREV_TAG}..HEAD --pretty=format:"%h %s" --no-merges
# Get detailed diff stats
git diff ${PREV_TAG}..HEAD --stat
# List changed files by directory
git diff ${PREV_TAG}..HEAD --name-only | sort | uniq
Also gather PR information:
# Get merged PRs since the tag (requires gh CLI)
gh pr list --state merged --search "merged:>=$(git log -1 --format=%ci $PREV_TAG | cut -d' ' -f1)" --json number,title,author,labels
Categorize each change into exactly one of these groups (in this order):
| Category | Include | Exclude |
|---|---|---|
| Added | New features, new public APIs, new CLI commands | Internal utilities not exposed to users |
| Changed | Modified behavior, performance improvements, updated dependencies with user impact | Refactors with no behavior change |
| Deprecated | Features marked for future removal | - |
| Removed | Deleted features, removed public APIs | Removed internal code |
| Fixed | Bug fixes, error handling improvements | Test-only fixes |
| Security | Vulnerability patches, security hardening | - |
Exclude entirely:
Based on the changes, suggest the next version following Semantic Versioning:
Detect the tag format from existing tags (with or without v prefix).
Generate a CHANGELOG.md entry using this exact format:
## [VERSION] - YYYY-MM-DD
### Added
- **scope:** Add new feature description ([#54](REPO_URL/pull/54))
### Changed
- **Breaking:** Rename `oldName()` to `newName()` for consistency ([#145](REPO_URL/pull/145))
**Migration:** Replace all calls to `oldName()` with `newName()`.
### Deprecated
- **scope:** Deprecate `legacy_function()` in favor of `new_function()` ([#143](REPO_URL/pull/143))
### Removed
- **Breaking:** Remove deprecated `old_function()` ([#141](REPO_URL/pull/141))
### Fixed
- **scope:** Fix race condition when multiple workers access shared state ([#139](REPO_URL/pull/139))
### Security
- **deps:** Update vulnerable package to patched version ([#49](REPO_URL/pull/49))
Format requirements:
**server:**, **cli:**, **api:**Breaking changes:
**Breaking:****Migration:** block on the next line explaining exactly what users must changeTone:
Bad examples to avoid:
# BAD - Too vague
- Fixed bugs
- Performance improvements
- Updated dependencies
# BAD - Implementation-focused
- Refactored the internal state machine to use async/await
# BAD - Missing context
- Fixed #234
Good examples to follow:
# GOOD - Specific and user-focused
- **server:** Fix timeout errors when processing files larger than 100MB ([#234](URL))
- **cli:** Add `--dry-run` flag to preview changes before execution ([#235](URL))
- **api:** Improve cold-start latency from 2.3s to 0.8s by lazy-loading plugins ([#236](URL))
If CHANGELOG.md exists:
## [Unreleased] section (or at top if no Unreleased)If CHANGELOG.md doesn't exist, create it with this header:
# Changelog
All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file.
The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.1.0/),
and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html).
## [Unreleased]
Update the footer reference links at the bottom of the file. This step is mandatory — CodeRabbit and other reviewers will flag the changelog as incomplete if these are missing. Two edits are required:
a. Advance [Unreleased] so it compares against the new version instead of the previous one.
b. Insert a new [NEW_VERSION] line right below [Unreleased], comparing the previous tag to the new one.
Example diff (releasing 3.2.0 after 3.1.0):
-[Unreleased]: https://github.com/OWNER/REPO/compare/v3.1.0...HEAD
+[Unreleased]: https://github.com/OWNER/REPO/compare/v3.2.0...HEAD
+[3.2.0]: https://github.com/OWNER/REPO/compare/v3.1.0...v3.2.0
[3.1.0]: https://github.com/OWNER/REPO/compare/v3.0.0...v3.1.0
After editing, run Step 6 to verify both footer lines exist and are correct. Do not skip Step 6 — it is the hard gate that prevents the recurring "missing footer compare link" reviewer feedback.
This is the enforcement gate for footer compare links. It must run before gen-release-notes reports success and before any commit step in the release workflow. It is not advisory — both grep -q checks must exit 0 or the gate fails with a named missing line.
Run this block exactly:
# Read the staged CHANGELOG.md blob (index), not the working tree, so unstaged
# edits cannot make the gate pass when the commit would actually fail.
STAGED_CHANGELOG=$(git show :CHANGELOG.md)
# Extract NEW and PREV versions from the staged CHANGELOG.md.
# We only match numeric `## [X.Y.Z]` headings so `## [Unreleased]` is skipped.
NEW_VERSION=$(printf '%s\n' "$STAGED_CHANGELOG" | grep -m1 -E '^## \[[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\]' | sed -E 's/^## \[([0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+)\].*/\1/')
PREV_VERSION=$(printf '%s\n' "$STAGED_CHANGELOG" | grep -m2 -E '^## \[[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\]' | sed -n '2p' | sed -E 's/^## \[([0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+)\].*/\1/')
if [ -z "$NEW_VERSION" ] || [ -z "$PREV_VERSION" ]; then
echo "GATE FAIL: could not extract NEW_VERSION ($NEW_VERSION) or PREV_VERSION ($PREV_VERSION) from staged CHANGELOG.md"
exit 1
fi
# Infer optional tag prefix (`v` or empty) from the existing [Unreleased] footer.
# Step 3 explicitly allows tags with or without `v`; never hardcode `v` here.
# Fall back to `v` only when no [Unreleased] footer exists yet (first release).
TAG_PREFIX=$(printf '%s\n' "$STAGED_CHANGELOG" | sed -nE 's|^\[Unreleased\]: .*/compare/(v?)[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.\.\.HEAD$|\1|p' | head -1)
if ! printf '%s\n' "$STAGED_CHANGELOG" | grep -qE '^\[Unreleased\]:'; then
TAG_PREFIX="v"
fi
echo "Gating footer compare links: NEW=${TAG_PREFIX}${NEW_VERSION}, PREV=${TAG_PREFIX}${PREV_VERSION}"
# Escape dots so they match literally inside the regex.
NEW_RE=${NEW_VERSION//./\\.}
PREV_RE=${PREV_VERSION//./\\.}
# Check 1: the new [NEW_VERSION] footer line exists and points PREV->NEW.
printf '%s\n' "$STAGED_CHANGELOG" | grep -qE "^\[${NEW_RE}\]: .*compare/${TAG_PREFIX}${PREV_RE}\.\.\.${TAG_PREFIX}${NEW_RE}\$" \
|| { echo "GATE FAIL: missing footer line: [${NEW_VERSION}]: .../compare/${TAG_PREFIX}${PREV_VERSION}...${TAG_PREFIX}${NEW_VERSION}"; exit 1; }
# Check 2: the [Unreleased] footer line is advanced to compare from the new tag.
printf '%s\n' "$STAGED_CHANGELOG" | grep -qE "^\[Unreleased\]: .*compare/${TAG_PREFIX}${NEW_RE}\.\.\.HEAD\$" \
|| { echo "GATE FAIL: [Unreleased] is not advanced; expected: [Unreleased]: .../compare/${TAG_PREFIX}${NEW_VERSION}...HEAD"; exit 1; }
echo "Footer compare links verified: [${NEW_VERSION}] and [Unreleased] both present and correct."
Pass condition (objective): both grep -q invocations above exit 0 against the staged CHANGELOG.md. The block must print Footer compare links verified: ... and exit 0.
On fail: the gate names the missing or wrong line. Return to Step 5 and edit CHANGELOG.md to add or correct that line, then re-run this block. Do not proceed to Step 7 or report success until the block exits 0.
After updating the changelog, provide:
Map commit prefixes to changelog categories:
| Commit Prefix | Changelog Category |
|---|---|
feat(scope): | Added |
feat!(scope): | Added (with Breaking prefix) |
fix(scope): | Fixed |
perf(scope): | Changed |
security(scope): | Security |
docs:, chore:, ci:, test:, style: | Exclude |