com um clique
gen-release-notes
generate release notes for changes since a given tag
Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.
Menu
generate release notes for changes since a given tag
Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.
Use when you need a bite-sized, TDD-driven implementation plan but do NOT have a brainstorm-beagle spec to plan against. quick-plan reconstructs intent from the current conversation, fans out domain-expert exploration subagents across the codebase, and synthesizes the same plan format write-plan produces — without requiring `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md`. Triggers on: "quick plan", "plan this out", "plan what we just discussed", "turn this into an implementation plan", "plan this without a spec", "I don't have a spec, just plan it", "write-plan but no spec". Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants an implementation or TDD plan and there is no spec to plan against — even if they just say "plan it" after discussing a feature. Writes to `.beagle/plans/<slug>/plan.md`. If a finalized spec already exists at `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md`, prefer write-plan. Does NOT brainstorm specs, write code, or execute the plan — produces the plan document (and an optional handoff prompt) only.
Use when the user has a fuzzy idea and wants to shape it into a concrete project spec before planning or building. Triggers on: "brainstorm this", "I have an idea for...", "help me think through this project", "what should I build", "spec this out". Also catches vague feature descriptions needing structured questioning to clarify scope. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, review strategy docs, or run strategy interviews — produces a WHAT/WHY spec through dialogue, not a HOW plan.
Use as the follow-up to brainstorm-beagle when a spec has an Open Questions section (or quietly carries latent gaps) that need closing before planning or implementation can begin. Triggers on: "resolve the open questions", "close the gaps in this spec", "research the open items", "finalize my spec", "make this spec implementation-ready", "answer the TBDs". Also triggers whenever the user points at a brainstorm-beagle spec and asks for research, proposals, or answers to unresolved items. Orchestrates parallel research subagents when available (falls back to inline sequential research otherwise), proposes answers one at a time for user approval, then rewrites the spec in place so it arrives at planning with no known gaps. Does NOT write code, design implementation, or create plans — it only produces a complete spec.
Use when you have a finalized brainstorm-beagle spec at `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/spec.md` and need a bite-sized, TDD-driven implementation plan before any code is written. Triggers on: "write a plan", "plan this spec", "turn the spec into a plan", "now plan the implementation", "write-plan". Reads the spec, designs the file structure, decomposes work into 2-5 minute TDD steps with exact paths and commands, self-reviews against the spec, gets user approval, then writes to `.beagle/concepts/<slug>/plan.md` and offers to generate an execution handoff prompt via the subagent-prompt skill. Does NOT brainstorm specs, write code, or execute the plan — produces the plan document (and an optional handoff prompt) only.
Core technical documentation writing principles for voice, tone, structure, and LLM-friendly patterns. Use when writing or reviewing any documentation.
Generate first-draft technical documentation from code analysis
Baseado na classificação ocupacional SOC
| name | gen-release-notes |
| description | generate release notes for changes since a given tag |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Generate professional release notes following the Keep a Changelog standard.
Input: Previous tag (e.g., v0.0.1)
$ARGUMENTS
Analyze the changes thoroughly before generating release notes.
Do not invent tags, PR numbers, or links. Each row must pass before the work that depends on it.
| When | Pass condition (evidence) | On fail |
|---|---|---|
Before git log / git diff | git tag -l "$PREV_TAG" prints exactly one line matching PREV_TAG | Stop; report that the tag is missing—do not write changelog entries |
| Before categorizing | git rev-parse "$PREV_TAG^{commit}" exits 0 | Stop; fix PREV_TAG or repo checkout |
If using gh pr list | Command exits 0 and JSON is valid | Fall back to commit subjects + merge-commit URLs only; do not fabricate PR numbers |
| After Step 5 footer edits | Step 6 footer-gate exits 0 (both grep -q checks pass against the staged CHANGELOG.md) | Re-run footer edits from Step 5, then re-run Step 6 until it exits 0 |
Run these commands to collect information about changes since the provided tag:
# Store the previous tag
PREV_TAG="$ARGUMENTS"
# Gate: tag must exist (output must be non-empty and match PREV_TAG)
git tag -l "$PREV_TAG"
# If the line above prints nothing, STOP — do not continue below.
# Get the repo URL for PR links
git remote get-url origin
# List commits since last tag
git log ${PREV_TAG}..HEAD --pretty=format:"%h %s" --no-merges
# Get detailed diff stats
git diff ${PREV_TAG}..HEAD --stat
# List changed files by directory
git diff ${PREV_TAG}..HEAD --name-only | sort | uniq
Also gather PR information:
# Get merged PRs since the tag (requires gh CLI)
gh pr list --state merged --search "merged:>=$(git log -1 --format=%ci $PREV_TAG | cut -d' ' -f1)" --json number,title,author,labels
Categorize each change into exactly one of these groups (in this order):
| Category | Include | Exclude |
|---|---|---|
| Added | New features, new public APIs, new CLI commands | Internal utilities not exposed to users |
| Changed | Modified behavior, performance improvements, updated dependencies with user impact | Refactors with no behavior change |
| Deprecated | Features marked for future removal | - |
| Removed | Deleted features, removed public APIs | Removed internal code |
| Fixed | Bug fixes, error handling improvements | Test-only fixes |
| Security | Vulnerability patches, security hardening | - |
Exclude entirely:
Based on the changes, suggest the next version following Semantic Versioning:
Detect the tag format from existing tags (with or without v prefix).
Generate a CHANGELOG.md entry using this exact format:
## [VERSION] - YYYY-MM-DD
### Added
- **scope:** Add new feature description ([#54](REPO_URL/pull/54))
### Changed
- **Breaking:** Rename `oldName()` to `newName()` for consistency ([#145](REPO_URL/pull/145))
**Migration:** Replace all calls to `oldName()` with `newName()`.
### Deprecated
- **scope:** Deprecate `legacy_function()` in favor of `new_function()` ([#143](REPO_URL/pull/143))
### Removed
- **Breaking:** Remove deprecated `old_function()` ([#141](REPO_URL/pull/141))
### Fixed
- **scope:** Fix race condition when multiple workers access shared state ([#139](REPO_URL/pull/139))
### Security
- **deps:** Update vulnerable package to patched version ([#49](REPO_URL/pull/49))
Format requirements:
**server:**, **cli:**, **api:**Breaking changes:
**Breaking:****Migration:** block on the next line explaining exactly what users must changeTone:
Bad examples to avoid:
# BAD - Too vague
- Fixed bugs
- Performance improvements
- Updated dependencies
# BAD - Implementation-focused
- Refactored the internal state machine to use async/await
# BAD - Missing context
- Fixed #234
Good examples to follow:
# GOOD - Specific and user-focused
- **server:** Fix timeout errors when processing files larger than 100MB ([#234](URL))
- **cli:** Add `--dry-run` flag to preview changes before execution ([#235](URL))
- **api:** Improve cold-start latency from 2.3s to 0.8s by lazy-loading plugins ([#236](URL))
If CHANGELOG.md exists:
## [Unreleased] section (or at top if no Unreleased)If CHANGELOG.md doesn't exist, create it with this header:
# Changelog
All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file.
The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.1.0/),
and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html).
## [Unreleased]
Update the footer reference links at the bottom of the file. This step is mandatory — CodeRabbit and other reviewers will flag the changelog as incomplete if these are missing. Two edits are required:
a. Advance [Unreleased] so it compares against the new version instead of the previous one.
b. Insert a new [NEW_VERSION] line right below [Unreleased], comparing the previous tag to the new one.
Example diff (releasing 3.2.0 after 3.1.0):
-[Unreleased]: https://github.com/OWNER/REPO/compare/v3.1.0...HEAD
+[Unreleased]: https://github.com/OWNER/REPO/compare/v3.2.0...HEAD
+[3.2.0]: https://github.com/OWNER/REPO/compare/v3.1.0...v3.2.0
[3.1.0]: https://github.com/OWNER/REPO/compare/v3.0.0...v3.1.0
After editing, run Step 6 to verify both footer lines exist and are correct. Do not skip Step 6 — it is the hard gate that prevents the recurring "missing footer compare link" reviewer feedback.
This is the enforcement gate for footer compare links. It must run before gen-release-notes reports success and before any commit step in the release workflow. It is not advisory — both grep -q checks must exit 0 or the gate fails with a named missing line.
Run this block exactly:
# Read the staged CHANGELOG.md blob (index), not the working tree, so unstaged
# edits cannot make the gate pass when the commit would actually fail.
STAGED_CHANGELOG=$(git show :CHANGELOG.md)
# Extract NEW and PREV versions from the staged CHANGELOG.md.
# We only match numeric `## [X.Y.Z]` headings so `## [Unreleased]` is skipped.
NEW_VERSION=$(printf '%s\n' "$STAGED_CHANGELOG" | grep -m1 -E '^## \[[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\]' | sed -E 's/^## \[([0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+)\].*/\1/')
PREV_VERSION=$(printf '%s\n' "$STAGED_CHANGELOG" | grep -m2 -E '^## \[[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\]' | sed -n '2p' | sed -E 's/^## \[([0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+)\].*/\1/')
if [ -z "$NEW_VERSION" ] || [ -z "$PREV_VERSION" ]; then
echo "GATE FAIL: could not extract NEW_VERSION ($NEW_VERSION) or PREV_VERSION ($PREV_VERSION) from staged CHANGELOG.md"
exit 1
fi
# Infer optional tag prefix (`v` or empty) from the existing [Unreleased] footer.
# Step 3 explicitly allows tags with or without `v`; never hardcode `v` here.
# Fall back to `v` only when no [Unreleased] footer exists yet (first release).
TAG_PREFIX=$(printf '%s\n' "$STAGED_CHANGELOG" | sed -nE 's|^\[Unreleased\]: .*/compare/(v?)[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.\.\.HEAD$|\1|p' | head -1)
if ! printf '%s\n' "$STAGED_CHANGELOG" | grep -qE '^\[Unreleased\]:'; then
TAG_PREFIX="v"
fi
echo "Gating footer compare links: NEW=${TAG_PREFIX}${NEW_VERSION}, PREV=${TAG_PREFIX}${PREV_VERSION}"
# Escape dots so they match literally inside the regex.
NEW_RE=${NEW_VERSION//./\\.}
PREV_RE=${PREV_VERSION//./\\.}
# Check 1: the new [NEW_VERSION] footer line exists and points PREV->NEW.
printf '%s\n' "$STAGED_CHANGELOG" | grep -qE "^\[${NEW_RE}\]: .*compare/${TAG_PREFIX}${PREV_RE}\.\.\.${TAG_PREFIX}${NEW_RE}\$" \
|| { echo "GATE FAIL: missing footer line: [${NEW_VERSION}]: .../compare/${TAG_PREFIX}${PREV_VERSION}...${TAG_PREFIX}${NEW_VERSION}"; exit 1; }
# Check 2: the [Unreleased] footer line is advanced to compare from the new tag.
printf '%s\n' "$STAGED_CHANGELOG" | grep -qE "^\[Unreleased\]: .*compare/${TAG_PREFIX}${NEW_RE}\.\.\.HEAD\$" \
|| { echo "GATE FAIL: [Unreleased] is not advanced; expected: [Unreleased]: .../compare/${TAG_PREFIX}${NEW_VERSION}...HEAD"; exit 1; }
echo "Footer compare links verified: [${NEW_VERSION}] and [Unreleased] both present and correct."
Pass condition (objective): both grep -q invocations above exit 0 against the staged CHANGELOG.md. The block must print Footer compare links verified: ... and exit 0.
On fail: the gate names the missing or wrong line. Return to Step 5 and edit CHANGELOG.md to add or correct that line, then re-run this block. Do not proceed to Step 7 or report success until the block exits 0.
After updating the changelog, provide:
Map commit prefixes to changelog categories:
| Commit Prefix | Changelog Category |
|---|---|
feat(scope): | Added |
feat!(scope): | Added (with Breaking prefix) |
fix(scope): | Fixed |
perf(scope): | Changed |
security(scope): | Security |
docs:, chore:, ci:, test:, style: | Exclude |