Skip to main content

codexkit-pmbok8-earned-value

Calculate and interpret Earned Value Management (EVM) metrics per PMBOK 8 Measurement Performance Domain. Compute SPI, CPI, EAC, ETC, TCPI, and generate variance narratives with corrective action recommendations. Use during project execution to assess schedule and cost performance.

Source facts

Repository
hoavdc/CodexKit
Last source activity
March 22, 2026 at 17:03
Detected SKILL.md language
English
Stars
26
Forks
12

Install options

The review-first prompt is selected by default. You can switch to a direct command or download a local copy.

Review the source files

Read SKILL.md and any companion files shown by SkillsMP before deciding whether to install.

File Explorer
2 files

Showing SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Source instructions · Read-only preview
name
codexkit-pmbok8-earned-value
description
Calculate and interpret Earned Value Management (EVM) metrics per PMBOK 8 Measurement Performance Domain. Compute SPI, CPI, EAC, ETC, TCPI, and generate variance narratives with corrective action recommendations. Use during project execution to assess schedule and cost performance.
version
1.0.0
category
data
# Earned Value Management Analyst ## When to Use - During project execution when tracking schedule and cost performance - At monthly or sprint-end status reporting cycles - When stakeholders need objective performance data beyond percentage-complete guesses - When forecasting final project cost (EAC) using multiple methods ## Procedure ### Step 1 — Collect Baseline Data 1. Confirm Budget at Completion (BAC) 2. Record Planned Value (PV) at the reporting date 3. Record Earned Value (EV) — value of work actually completed 4. Record Actual Cost (AC) — money spent to date ### Step 2 — Calculate Core Metrics | Metric | Formula | Interpretation | |--------|---------|----------------| | **SV** | EV − PV | < 0 = behind schedule | | **CV** | EV − AC | < 0 = over budget | | **SPI** | EV / PV | < 1.0 = behind schedule | | **CPI** | EV / AC | < 1.0 = over budget | ### Step 3 — Forecast Completion | Method | Formula | When to Use | |--------|---------|-------------| | **EAC (typical)** | BAC / CPI | Current CPI trend continues | | **EAC (atypical)** | AC + (BAC − EV) | Variance was one-time | | **EAC (SPI×CPI)** | AC + (BAC − EV) / (CPI × SPI) | Both schedule and cost pressure | | **ETC** | EAC − AC | Remaining spend | | **TCPI (BAC)** | (BAC − EV) / (BAC − AC) | Efficiency needed to hit BAC | | **TCPI (EAC)** | (BAC − EV) / (EAC − AC) | Efficiency needed to hit new EAC | | **VAC** | BAC − EAC | Forecast variance at completion | ### Step 4 — Generate Narrative 1. Summarize performance in plain language (ahead/behind, over/under) 2. Apply traffic-light rating: SPI/CPI ≥ 0.95 = 🟢, 0.8–0.94 = 🟡, < 0.8 = 🔴 3. Recommend corrective actions for any metric in 🟡 or 🔴 zone 4. Note trends by comparing with previous period metrics ## Inputs | Input | Required | Format | |-------|----------|--------| | BAC (total budget) | Yes | Currency amount | | PV (planned value to date) | Yes | Currency amount | | EV (earned value to date) | Yes | Currency amount | | AC (actual cost to date) | Yes | Currency amount | | Prior period SPI/CPI | Recommended | Decimal (for trend) | ## Output ```markdown ## EVM Status Report — [Project Name] — Period [X] ### Performance Summary | Metric | Value | Status | |--------|-------|--------| | BAC | $500,000 | — | | PV | $200,000 | — | | EV | $180,000 | — | | AC | $210,000 | — | | SV | -$20,000 | 🟡 Behind schedule | | CV | -$30,000 | 🔴 Over budget | | SPI | 0.90 | 🟡 | | CPI | 0.86 | 🔴 | ### Forecast | Method | EAC | VAC | |--------|-----|-----| | Typical (CPI trend) | $581,395 | -$81,395 | | Atypical (one-time) | $530,000 | -$30,000 | | SPI×CPI compound | $612,745 | -$112,745 | ### TCPI - To hit BAC: **1.10** (achievable with corrective action) - To hit EAC: **0.86** (current pace) ### Corrective Actions 1. CPI 🔴: Review scope for non-essential deliverables to reduce remaining cost 2. SPI 🟡: Fast-track critical path activities in next 2 sprints 3. Escalate to sponsor if CPI does not improve to 0.95 by Period X+2 ``` ## Definition of Done - [ ] All 7 EVM metrics calculated correctly - [ ] At least 2 EAC methods presented - [ ] Traffic-light status applied to SPI and CPI - [ ] Corrective actions provided for any metric in 🟡 or 🔴 - [ ] Narrative is in plain language (not just formulas) ## Examples ### Prompt ```text My project has BAC = $500,000. As of end of Month 4: PV = $200,000, EV = $180,000, AC = $210,000. Last month SPI was 0.93, CPI was 0.89. Generate a full EVM report with forecasts and corrective actions. ``` ## Quality Criteria - [ ] Data sources and assumptions are explicitly stated - [ ] Calculations are reproducible from provided inputs - [ ] Visualizations or tables have clear labels, units, and time ranges - [ ] Caveats and confidence levels are documented for estimates ## Verification (4C) | Check | Question | |-------|----------| | **Correctness** | Are formulas, aggregations, and statistical methods applied correctly? | | **Completeness** | Does the analysis cover all requested metrics and time ranges? | | **Context-fit** | Are the chosen metrics relevant to the business question being answered? | | **Consequence** | If this data were used for a decision today, what blind spots remain? | ## Edge Cases - **Missing or incomplete data** — Document gaps and their potential impact on conclusions. Provide ranges instead of point estimates. - **Outliers skewing results** — Report with and without outliers. Document the decision to include or exclude. - **Changing data definitions mid-period** — Split analysis at the change boundary and note the schema difference. ## Changelog - v1.0.0 — Initial release
View on GitHub