| name | fact-check |
| description | Verify a specific claim by finding multiple authoritative sources that confirm or contradict it. Use when the user asks to fact-check, verify, or check whether something is true. |
Fact Check
When to use
The user has stated a specific claim and wants to know if it's accurate. Examples:
- "Is it true that X?"
- "Fact-check this: ..."
- "Did Y actually happen?"
Steps
-
Identify the claim — extract the precise factual assertion. If the claim is fuzzy ("apparently X is good"), use ask_questions to nail down what specifically to verify.
-
Search for primary sources — use web_search with the claim phrased neutrally. Look for:
- Official sources (government sites, academic papers, the organisation involved)
- Reputable journalism (major outlets with editorial standards)
- Primary data (statistics agencies, public records)
-
Avoid these as sole sources:
- Social media posts (use only as leads to follow up)
- Single-source blogs without citations
- Anything that quotes the claim back without independent verification
-
Cross-reference — find at least 2-3 independent sources. If they all trace back to one origin, you only have one source.
-
Report verdict — use show_alert with the appropriate type:
success — Confirmed (multiple authoritative sources agree)
warning — Partly true / context needed
error — False (sources contradict the claim)
info — Unverifiable (insufficient evidence either way)
-
Provide evidence — list the sources with what each one says. Use markdown links.
Style
- Be neutral. Avoid editorialising.
- Distinguish "X is false" from "I couldn't find evidence for X" — these are different.
- If the claim is partly true, be specific about which parts.
What not to do
- Don't trust a single source, even an authoritative one, for contested claims.
- Don't conflate "common knowledge" with verified fact.
- Don't fabricate confidence — uncertainty is a valid finding.